http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48252
--- Comment #5 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-04-18 07:14:26 UTC ---
Author: irar
Date: Mon Apr 18 07:14:22 2011
New Revision: 172639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172639
Log:
PR target/48252
* config/arm/arm.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48653
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
07:38:17 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Apr 18 07:38:11 2011
New Revision: 172640
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172640
Log:
PR tree-optimization/48616
* tree-vect-stm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48653
--- Comment #2 from jafb at tinet dot org 2011-04-18 08:29:32 UTC ---
Sorry. I thought the default was -g -O2 and omitting -g in BOOT_CFLAGS is even
documented, but I won't file any other bugs for these reasons...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48660
Summary: ARM ICE in expand_expr_real_1
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-18 08:40:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 24027
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24027
Test program for optimization
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Henlich
2011-04-18 08:39:17 UTC ---
After some testing, I found the problem to be optimization-related. It seems
the following term is calculated as a long double and not rounded before the
"if (m < temp)" comparison,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48602
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Summary: gcc 4.6 wrong-code regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48395
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48492
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-04-18
10:13:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Apr 18 10:13:49 2011
New Revision: 172641
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172641
Log:
PR lto/48492
* cfgexpand.c (expand_debu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48662
Summary: [4.7 regression] ICE in lower_emutls_function_body, at
tree-emutls.c:623
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48649
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i386-*-coff
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663
Summary: [4.7 regression] final.c:dump_basic_block_info breaks
several Tru64 UNIX tests
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48662
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86 |i?86-*-*
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48663
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
10:58:56 UTC ---
Can't reproduce the ICE on the trunk myself, the testcase works for me on the
trunk starting with
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172023
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #9 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-18 11:12:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Thanks. But I'm confused by what is replacing the hard-error. Isn't this
> supposed to be well-formed?
>
> template class = decltype(T())
> >
> char f(in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
11:18:06 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 11:18:01 2011
New Revision: 172642
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172642
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48600
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2011-04-18
11:33:34 UTC ---
It is not accepted.
I tried again to remove the special code for is_default_constructible in
and a number of static_asserts, all having to do with arrays
fired...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Krügler
2011-04-18 11:47:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> It is not accepted.
>
> I tried again to remove the special code for is_default_constructible in
> and a number of static_asserts, all having to do with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #53 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
11:47:45 UTC ---
Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported
for 4.6.1? And can then the PR be closed?
w32 --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-libquadmath
--with-as=/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/as --with-ld=/i686-pc-mingw32/bin/ld
Thread model: win32
gcc version 4.7.0 20110418 (experimental) (GCC)
g++-svn -c pr48569.cpp
pr48569.cpp: In member function 'last_value<
>::result_type last_value<
&
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48664
Summary: Use autoconf test instead of target blacklist to
determine weak undefined reference support
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #54 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-18
12:07:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #53)
> Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported
> for 4.6.1? And can then the PR be closed?
FWIW, I just opened PR 48664 in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48650
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48531
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #6 from bero at arklinux dot org 2011-04-18 12:19:12 UTC ---
cloog 0.16.2 with isl 0.06 (I read somewhere ppl should be replaced with isl?)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48659
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
12:17:12 UTC ---
On linux we assume a 16 byte aligned stack for threads, so this might hint
at some MinGW specific issue either in our OMP runtime or with windows
thread handling.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48652
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima 2011-04-18
12:47:21 UTC ---
I'm looking into why fr14 is allocated to r242 when -O1 is specified.
Here is the info about r242 from .ira dump with -O1
r242: preferred GENERAL_REGS, alternative GENERAL_FP_RE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48665
Summary: type of const member function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48611
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
13:36:23 UTC ---
Created attachment 24030
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24030
gcc46-pr48611.patch
While the bug is most probably elsewhere, I wonder why
note_eh_region_may_contai
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48666
Summary: [4.5.2/4.6 regression] -Warray-bounds doesn't trigger
anymore for simple case
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48657
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-04-18
13:47:57 UTC ---
VectorDimension's DECL_INITIAL has different type (int rather than unsigned
int), and when build_integral_nontype_arg_conv calls convert_like for
ck_identity conversion that DECL_INITI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #55 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-04-18 14:07:10 UTC ---
> --- Comment #53 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
> 11:47:45 UTC ---
> Rainer, all: Is the problem now fixed on 4.7? If so, should it be backported
Yes: I had the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47484
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:22:42 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:22:35 2011
New Revision: 172649
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172649
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46304
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:28:50 UTC ---
C++ people?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48330
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:06:31 UTC ---
Yes.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #19 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:02:22 2011
New Revision: 172647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172647
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 14:35:21 UTC
---
Created attachment 24032
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24032
slp-3.c -fdump-tree-vect-details output, 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.5.4 |4.6.0
Target Milestone|4.5.4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48035
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47899
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||45606
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||44295
--- Comment #11 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48667
Summary: [ skipping N instantiation contexts ] Skips exactly
those which are of interest to me
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48632
--- Comment #3 from Phelippe Neveu 2011-04-18
14:48:45 UTC ---
Hi,
I tested the fix on the gcc-4_5-branch and it fixed the issue.
Regards,
Phelippe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031
--- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:37:18 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:37:08 2011
New Revision: 172652
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172652
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45267
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||
--- Comment #12 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 14:36:09 UTC
---
Created attachment 24033
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24033
no-vfa-pr29145.c -fdump-tree-vect-details output, 4.6 branch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48498
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-04-18 14:37:18 UTC ---
> --- Comment #2 from Ira Rosen 2011-04-17 12:15:29
> UTC ---
> Could you please attach vect dumps before the XPASSes? From the current dumps
> I
> can only unde
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
14:26:04 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 14:25:57 2011
New Revision: 172650
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172650
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
--- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
15:25:23 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:17 2011
New Revision: 172653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172653
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backporte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
--- Comment #5 from Richard Guenther 2011-04-18
15:25:24 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:25:17 2011
New Revision: 172653
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172653
Log:
2011-04-18 Richard Guenther
Backported
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46364
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46188
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48603
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #56 from Janne Blomqvist 2011-04-18
15:49:23 UTC ---
Author: jb
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:49:16 2011
New Revision: 172656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172656
Log:
PR 47571 Fix weakref trickery breakage on alpha-dec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 15:54:59 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Mon Apr 18 15:54:50 2011
New Revision: 172657
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172657
Log:
PR testsuite/48251
* gcc.dg/guality/guality.exp:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46317
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Pop 2011-04-18
16:09:49 UTC ---
The same patch applies to the 4.5 branch.
I am currently testing the patch on amd64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #12 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 16:48:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 24035
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24035
assembler output with as and gas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47333
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 16:49:29
UTC ---
I've now compared the assembler output on i386-pc-solaris2.11 with Sun as and
gas: with as, the g++-dg-lto-20091219-01.ltrans0.s file has a call to
call_ZL20__gthrw_pthread_o
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #7 from sebpop at gmail dot com
2011-04-18 16:51:23 UTC ---
> (I read somewhere ppl should be replaced with isl?)
Not true: GCC still depends on PPL.
The use of cloog-ppl is deprecated: GCC will not use it in the future.
Using cloog-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48661
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
Summary: [4.6/4.7 regression] COMDAT Group signature not
emitted in group
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48616
Matthias Kretz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #14 from Matthias K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48668
--- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-18 17:02:32 UTC
---
Created attachment 24037
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24037
assembler output before and after the culprit patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48438
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48669
Summary: sel_sched_region_2's "need_stall" vs.
-Werror=uninitialized
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18918
--- Comment #38 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
17:21:28 UTC ---
Author: burnus
Date: Mon Apr 18 17:21:24 2011
New Revision: 172658
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172658
Log:
2011-04-18 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48652
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48629
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48537
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48670
Summary: explosion in time and stack usage when using -ggdb
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48588
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus 2011-04-18
18:41:18 UTC ---
The problem is that when one goes via:
gfc_get_extern_function_decl -> gfc_get_function_type
one has for the "a" argument of DGESV_F90 in gfc_sym_type the value:
sym->as->type ==
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo