http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-07
20:10:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 7 20:10:44 2011
New Revision: 170752
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170752
Log:
PR c++/48008
* mangle.c (write_type): Strip
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40411
--- Comment #23 from Sean McGovern 2011-03-07
20:16:09 UTC ---
Ping.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
20:41:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 23576
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23576
hack
The c_parser_binary_expression stack impact could be decreased, either through
a hack like thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23575|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
21:35:24 UTC ---
Created attachment 23578
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23578
Implement stack in c_parser_binary_operation as VEC
And here is the alternative to use global VEC a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07
22:11:59 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 7 22:11:55 2011
New Revision: 170759
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170759
Log:
PR debug/47991
* var-tracking.c (find_use_v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48027
Summary: setmem pattern using undesirable RTL
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #2 from Frédéric Buclin 2011-03-07
22:52:57 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Our bugzilla used to change the assign-to field away from
> unassig...@gcc.gnu.org automatically. Now you have to do
> it in two steps.
Correct, we did t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Buclin 2011-03-07
23:03:33 UTC ---
The word "ASSIGNED" is confusing people, because it sounds like a synonym for
the assignee field. In Bugzilla 4.0, we renamed ASSIGNED to IN_PROGRESS.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29874
--- Comment #2 from stevenj at alum dot mit.edu 2011-03-07 23:13:41 UTC ---
Created attachment 23579
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23579
benchmark extracted from FFTW3 - size 64 FFT with SSE2
I extracted a little benchmark of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
Summary: [4.4 Regression] undeserved uninitialized variable
warning regression since 4.4.2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priorit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-07
23:46:05 UTC ---
That just renames the state, it doesn't help address the logical flaw, which is
that the fact a bug is being worked on and the person working on it are not
independent.
Having an IN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48029
Summary: ICE in finish_member_declaration() with --param
ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47145
--- Comment #24 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-03-08
00:04:10 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Tue Mar 8 00:04:05 2011
New Revision: 170763
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170763
Log:
2011-03-07 Benjamin Kosnik
Matthia
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
--- Comment #1 from Matt Hargett 2011-03-08 00:06:26 UTC
---
Created attachment 23580
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23580
pre-processed source of the file that triggers the -Wuninitialized warning
regression on x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48028
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski 2011-03-08
00:20:39 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> So the code looks like (after inlining and folding of *&):
Woops that is wrong, the first e!=0 should have been == 0 but we don't warn
there, hmm.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #15 from davidxl 2011-03-08 00:25:29
UTC ---
Created attachment 23581
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23581
patch2
Please validate the more generalized patch.
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
--- Comment #16 from davidxl 2011-03-08 00:26:47
UTC ---
The second patch should work for the two cases (verified with -mbranch-cost=0
on x86).
David
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from Richard H
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952
--- Comment #5 from Richard Henderson 2011-03-08
00:44:41 UTC ---
Author: rth
Date: Tue Mar 8 00:44:37 2011
New Revision: 170768
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170768
Log:
PR 47952
* trans-mem.c (tm_mangle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48030
Summary: Implement read_x using fbuf_getc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45911
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
03:08:24 UTC ---
Right. Assigning a bug to myself and setting the status to Assigned/In
Progress is a common enough action that there should be a shortcut so I don't
need to type my email address in e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
05:28:07 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 8 05:28:02 2011
New Revision: 170770
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170770
Log:
PR c++/48015
* init.c (constant_value_1): A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-08
05:28:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 8 05:28:13 2011
New Revision: 170771
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170771
Log:
PR c++/48003
* pt.c (convert_nontype_argume
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46944
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gseanmcg at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
