[Bug ada/48013] New: generic instantiation breaks the restriction of No_Elaboration_Code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48013 Summary: generic instantiation breaks the restriction of No_Elaboration_Code Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/46262] [OOP] tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46262 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dominique.pelletier at

[Bug fortran/48011] internal compiler error:tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have pointer_type in gimplify_call_expr at gimplify.c:2355

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48011 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #7 from davidxl 2011-03-07 08:40:29 UTC --- Created attachment 23566 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23566 Patch

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #8 from davidxl 2011-03-07 08:41:25 UTC --- Please verify the patch on hpux and os390. Thanks, David

[Bug ada/44431] [boot with C++] Conflicting exit declaration in ada/b_gnatb.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44431 Serge Belyshev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Last reconfirmed|2010-06-06 14:1

[Bug fortran/42189] gfc_is_constant_expr has unacceptable side effects

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42189 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-07 10:03:57 UTC --- > I believe the fix to PR47850 has resolved this issue. I suggest we close this > one. I agree unless someone comes with an explicit example.

[Bug fortran/47850] [4.6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47850 --- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-07 10:07:00 UTC --- I think the -std=f95 issue mentioned in comment #5 is pr41165.

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-07 10:11:36 UTC --- As shown by pr47850, the problem is not restricted to PRODUCT, but likely to the whole list in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29962#c3.

[Bug debug/47881] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fno-dce -funroll-loops -fno-web

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47881 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug bootstrap/48000] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug c++/48008] [4.6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function/43397.cc fails to assemble with -fabi-version=5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug c/48006] Inefficient optimization depends on builtin integer type of same size.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48006 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug pch/48004] doesn't work with randomize_va_space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48003] [4.6 Regression] Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug pch/47584] internal compiler error: sigsegv in libcpp/line-map.c:285

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47584 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.6.0 |--- Summary|[4.6 regression

[Bug rtl-optimization/47866] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/vector-2.c fails on IA64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47866 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target|

[Bug debug/47881] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fno-dce -funroll-loops -fno-web

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47881 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/47991] [4.6 Regression] Var-tracking ICE on s390x *setmem_long insn

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47991 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/48003] [4.6 Regression] Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug c++/48008] [4.6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function/43397.cc fails to assemble with -fabi-version=5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug pch/48004] doesn't work with randomize_va_space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 --- Comment #4 from wbrana 2011-03-07 10:54:43 UTC --- It is possible that this bug is related to PaX, which I'm using http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=301299#c31 I tried to disable PaX with "paxctl -pemrxs cc1plus", but warning disappear on

[Bug pch/48004] doesn't work with randomize_va_space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from Richard Guenth

[Bug pch/48004] doesn't work with randomize_va_space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 --- Comment #6 from wbrana 2011-03-07 11:20:55 UTC --- I can see warning also when PaX is disabled with kernel 2.6.37.2 randomize_va_space is 1 by default.

[Bug debug/47881] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fno-dce -funroll-loops -fno-web

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47881 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07 11:32:53 UTC --- Problems start when the combiner leaves in a trivially dead insn by substing it later on in some subsequent insn. Nothing until IRA calls delete_trivially_dead_insns, and when IRA cal

[Bug debug/47881] [4.6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O -fno-dce -funroll-loops -fno-web

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47881 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07 11:41:17 UTC --- --- gcc/ira.c.jj2011-02-21 15:37:42.0 +0100 +++ gcc/ira.c2011-03-07 12:33:59.0 +0100 @@ -3232,7 +3232,8 @@ ira (FILE *f) check_allocation (); #endif - d

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07 11:47:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390. Your patch works! It fixes uninit-pred-7_a.c on s390 and s390x. Thanks!

[Bug target/43700] [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] global register variables defect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43700 Steffen Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|| Known to fail|

[Bug pch/48004] doesn't work with randomize_va_space

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48004 --- Comment #7 from wbrana 2011-03-07 12:35:23 UTC --- Parsing /proc doesn't have to work with PaX kernel. PaX removes some info from e.g. maps file.

[Bug bootstrap/48014] New: Bootstrap fails in stage2 on Fortran front end typedef collision.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48014 Summary: Bootstrap fails in stage2 on Fortran front end typedef collision. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug c++/48003] [4.6 Regression] Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-07 13:42:37 UTC --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#699 added integer overflow ("a result that is not mathematically defined or not in the range of representable values for

[Bug rtl-optimization/47918] [4.6 Regression] noreturn discovery broke non local gotos on m68k

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47918 --- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2011-03-07 13:53:50 UTC --- I believe that the nonlocal gotos should be represented correctly in function marked noreturn. So i think noreturn function can do nonlocal goto... I get following CFG: x (int a) { s

[Bug c++/48015] New: ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 Summary: ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedT

[Bug target/48014] Bootstrap fails in stage2 on Fortran front end typedef collision.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48014 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-apple-darwin7.9.0

[Bug c++/48010] typedef redefinitions are allowed if the redefined type is a nested class type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48010 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||3.2.3 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/48016] New: Inconsistency in non-local goto save area

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016 Summary: Inconsistency in non-local goto save area Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: una

[Bug c++/48003] [4.6 Regression] Regression in Template Constants from 4.5.2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48003 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug go/48017] New: Network tests should fail gracefully without network connectivity

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48017 Summary: Network tests should fail gracefully without network connectivity Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug middle-end/48016] Inconsistency in non-local goto save area

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-07 14:13:10 UTC --- The gimple middle-end only knows one pointer type mode, ptr_type_mode. If we want to save Pmode then we need to use an appropriate integer type and a proper alias set. I guess thi

[Bug go/48018] New: libgo needs to handle Solaris 2 syslog

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48018 Summary: libgo needs to handle Solaris 2 syslog Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

[Bug go/48019] New: Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48019 Summary: Need to handle EINTR in libgo testsuite Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

[Bug go/48020] New: libgo flag test FAILs on Solaris 2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48020 Summary: libgo flag test FAILs on Solaris 2 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go AssignedTo: i...@airs.com

[Bug middle-end/48016] Inconsistency in non-local goto save area

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-07 14:40:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > The gimple middle-end only knows one pointer type mode, ptr_type_mode. If > we want to save Pmode then we need to use an appropriate integer type > and a proper a

[Bug middle-end/48016] Inconsistency in non-local goto save area

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48016 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07 14:44:49 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Mar 7 14:44:45 2011 New Revision: 170735 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170735 Log: Adjust mode of non-local goto stack save are

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target||alpha-dec-osf5.1b Status|RESOLV

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/48021] New: [trans-mem] call to an undefined clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48021 Summary: [trans-mem] call to an undefined clone Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug c++/48015] ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/48015] ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 --- Comment #2 from Erik Schnetter 2011-03-07 15:14:00 UTC --- Created attachment 23570 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23570 Same source code preprocessed with gcc 4.5.2 If I use gcc 4.5.2: $ g++-mp-4.5 --version g++-mp-4.

[Bug c++/48015] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE: unexpected expression |[4.6 Regression] [C++0x]

[Bug c++/48015] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Priority|P3

[Bug c++/47952] [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23513|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/47786] tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Froyd 2011-03-07 15:32:29 UTC --- Author: froydnj Date: Mon Mar 7 15:32:25 2011 New Revision: 170739 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170739 Log: PR c/47786 * c-common.c (c_type_hash): Cal

[Bug c/47786] tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'tree_list' in c_type_hash, at c-family/c-common.c:4066

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47786 Nathan Froyd changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/47952] [trans-mem] undefined reference to transaction clone

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47952 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-07 15:37:54 UTC --- The proposed patch in Comment 2 fixes the problem testcase and causes no regressions on x86_64-apple-darwin10. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-03/msg00571.html

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #71 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-07 15:57:59 UTC --- N.B. The latest C++0x draft, N3042, specifies the value 201103L

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #10 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07 15:59:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390. Perhaps you could enhance your patch to cover then uninit-pred-8_a.c case as well. It looks quite similiar: /

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #11 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07 16:01:09 UTC --- Created attachment 23572 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23572 uninit-pred-8_a.c.126t.cddce2

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #12 from Andreas Krebbel 2011-03-07 16:01:37 UTC --- Created attachment 23573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23573 uninit-pred-8_a.c.128t.uninit

[Bug tree-optimization/48022] New: [4.6 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow warning on code that doesn't have overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022 Summary: [4.6 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow warning on code that doesn't have overflows Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-07 16:08:23 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) > All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.so has an > undefined reference to clock_gettime: > The function is defined in librt only.

[Bug c++/47606] [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm with O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47606 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org|rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug c++/47747] [trans-mem] unsafe virtual function not properly displayed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47747 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #26 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-07 16:20:17 UTC --- > --- Comment #25 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-07 > 16:08:23 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #24) >> All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.

[Bug c/48023] New: [trans-mem] no-builtin flag and TM builtin like memset

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48023 Summary: [trans-mem] no-builtin flag and TM builtin like memset Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assigne

[Bug c++/47957] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Type mismatch when a class derived a same name with template parameter

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned a

[Bug tree-optimization/48022] [4.6 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow warning on code that doesn't have overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at CeBiTec dot |

[Bug bootstrap/48000] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-07 16:41:57 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Mar 7 16:41:53 2011 New Revision: 170740 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170740 Log: PR bootstrap/48000 * cfgloopmanip.c (fix_bb

[Bug bootstrap/48000] [4.6 Regression] LTO bootstrap failed with bootstrap-profiled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48000 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/48014] Bootstrap fails in stage2 on Fortran front end typedef collision.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48014 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-07 16:45:54 UTC --- Under POSIX, *_t is part of the implementation namespace rather than the user namespace if any POSIX header is included. (I don't know why this particular non-POSIX

[Bug tree-optimization/48022] [4.6 Regression] -Wstrict-overflow warning on code that doesn't have overflows

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48022 --- Comment #1 from rjones at redhat dot com 2011-03-07 16:51:14 UTC --- Report on Fedora devel mailing list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-March/thread.html#149342

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 --- Comment #13 from davidxl 2011-03-07 16:58:03 UTC --- Yes -- I also wanted to do the generalization. David (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > Please verify the patch on hpux and os390. > > Perhaps you could enhance you

[Bug c++/48008] [4.6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function/43397.cc fails to assemble with -fabi-version=5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Status|NEW

[Bug c++/48008] [4.6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/function/43397.cc fails to assemble with -fabi-version=5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48008 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2011-03-07 17:46:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Ok. I'm hoping you double checked the incantation with the other version that > exists. How would I do that?

[Bug fortran/47571] [4.6 Regression] undefined reference to clock_gettime in Linux build of 02/01/2011

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571 --- Comment #27 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca 2011-03-07 17:59:27 UTC --- > >> All fortran testing is broken on Tru64 UNIX, where libgfortran.so has an > >> undefined reference to clock_gettime: > >> The function is defined in librt only. > >

[Bug testsuite/45413] gcc.target/i386/combine-mul.c fails on PIC targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 --- Comment #3 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-07 18:07:33 UTC --- Author: mrs Date: Mon Mar 7 18:07:31 2011 New Revision: 170744 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170744 Log: 2011-03-07 Jack Howarth PR target

[Bug testsuite/45413] gcc.target/i386/combine-mul.c fails on PIC targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45413 m...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/47997] gcc on macosx: "ld: warning: -fwritable-strings not compatible with literal CF/NSString"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47997 --- Comment #7 from Mike Stump 2011-03-07 18:16:13 UTC --- Ok, you can look for strlen (s) == IDENTIFIER_LENGTH (x) in either the darwin.[ch] files, or, failing one there, in the backend files... I know I've seen one before, just can't recall wh

[Bug c/47837] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for bogus messages, line 26)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #14

[Bug c++/48015] [4.6 Regression] [C++0x] ICE: unexpected expression 'std::min' of kind overload

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48015 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #73 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-07 19:05:14 UTC --- > --- Comment #72 from Paolo Carlini > 2011-03-07 16:38:06 UTC --- > If I remember correctly, mostly Solaris issues prevented us from defining > __cplusplus to a

[Bug target/47230] [4.6 Regression] gcc fails to bootstrap on alpha in stage2 with "relocation truncated to fit: GPREL16 against ..."

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47230 Serge Belyshev changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure Status|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #74 from Marc Glisse 2011-03-07 19:21:16 UTC --- (In reply to comment #73) > > asking him to play a bit with the > > straightforward cpp_init_builtins patch defining __cplusplus to 199711 for > > c++98 (and 201103 in c++0x mode?) > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 --- Comment #4 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07 19:27:13 UTC --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon Mar 7 19:27:09 2011 New Revision: 170748 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170748 Log: PR target/47862 * config/rs6000/rs6

[Bug middle-end/48024] New: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr42883.C:63:1: internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1209

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48024 Summary: [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr42883.C:63:1: internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1209 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug middle-end/48024] [4.6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr42883.C:63:1: internal compiler error: in dfs_enumerate_from, at cfganal.c:1209

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48024 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug fortran/48025] New: Unnecessary function evaluations in arguments to size and ubound

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48025 Summary: Unnecessary function evaluations in arguments to size and ubound Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: e

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 --- Comment #5 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07 19:40:21 UTC --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon Mar 7 19:40:15 2011 New Revision: 170749 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170749 Log: PR target/47862 * config/rs6000/rs6

[Bug c++/48026] New: #pragma optimize ignored for C++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48026 Summary: #pragma optimize ignored for C++ Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 --- Comment #6 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07 19:47:07 UTC --- Author: pthaugen Date: Mon Mar 7 19:47:03 2011 New Revision: 170750 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170750 Log: PR target/47862 * config/rs6000/rs6

[Bug middle-end/31827] limits-exprparen.c: Pid 2297 received a SIGSEGV for stack growth failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827 Sean McGovern changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15 fro

[Bug fortran/22572] Double occurrence of matmul intrinsic not optimised

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22572 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug libstdc++/1773] __cplusplus defined to 1, should be 199711L

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 --- Comment #75 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-07 19:58:24 UTC --- For 4.7, if Rainer can help testing, we can certainly seriously attack and resolve this issue.

[Bug rtl-optimization/47862] Incorrect code for spilling a vector register

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47862 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47981] gcc.dg/lto/20110201-1 FAILs on Solaris 10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47981 --- Comment #3 from Sean McGovern 2011-03-07 20:08:00 UTC --- changing the cabs() call to __builtin_cabs() does succeed.

[Bug target/47947] Variables of type vector double are not copied correctly in gcc-4.5.1 and gcc-4.6.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47947 --- Comment #11 from Pat Haugen 2011-03-07 20:10:02 UTC --- PR47862 has been fixed on trunk and 4.5 development branch. Can you verify if that fixes this problem also?

  1   2   >