http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #22 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 08:20:59
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 7 08:20:56 2011
New Revision: 169877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169877
Log:
2011-02-07 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47225
> With Laurent's stub version of s-scaval.adb added as s-scaval-sh.adb and a
> minor change to a ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, sh-rtems now builds
> Ada.
>
> Is this OK to commit?
Note that the proper place to submit a patch officially is gcc-patches.
In any case, adding s-scaval-sh.adb isn't O
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #17 from charlet at adacore dot com
2011-02-07 09:04:18 UTC ---
> With Laurent's stub version of s-scaval.adb added as s-scaval-sh.adb and a
> minor change to a ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, sh-rtems now builds
> Ada.
>
> Is this OK
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-07
09:04:52 UTC ---
Reverting the r169513 change fixes the ICE. To reproduce, just a
--target=powerpc64-linux --enable-languages=c cross is enough, no need to
bother with cross-binutils etc.
Alex, could
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
09:17:08 UTC ---
known issue, the fix changes the ABI and so can't be done yet
N.B. N3225 is the current draft
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
09:30:42 UTC ---
Oops, I think I'm confusing this with another related issue - despite what I
said we do seem to have changed the signature, and we currently implement the
C++0x draft spec.
Tables 9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #24 from Paolo Bonzini 2011-02-07 09:48:42
UTC ---
Please use LDFLAGS, not LIBADD.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
Paolo Bonzini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47629
Summary: gcc.target/i386/pr47312.c fails to link on Solaris 9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47625
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
11:35:11 UTC ---
Huh, there isn't even such a union in the testcase ;)
On x86_64-linux for this testcase I get
FAIL: gcc.dg/guality/pr43077-1.c -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none line 42 varb
== 2
F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46556
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
11:42:28 UTC ---
In the .optimized dump I see the exact same IL with/without -flto (yes,
including debug stmts and locations).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47622
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47617
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-linux
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47621
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
12:09:36 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 7 12:09:31 2011
New Revision: 169881
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169881
Log:
2011-02-07 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in queue_insn, at
haifa-sched.c:1322 compiling 64-bit
libjava/java/lang/natString.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47383
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47048
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-07
12:29:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> More specifically, the code that is now confused by the (int) cast is:
>
> dr_analyze_innermost (dr);
> dr_analyze_indices (dr, nest, loop);
>
> in crea
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
12:49:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> > Btw, not really a patch that was appropriate for this stage ...
>
> Are you the same Richard Guenther who wrote comment #29 under PR 43494? :-)
> That
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47631
Summary: Support native TLS on Tru64 UNIX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 4
can not throw but has an EH edge with
-fnon-call-exceptions -ftrapv and operator new[]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47624
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47630
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-07
13:13:10 UTC ---
Might be a dup of PR47620.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
Summary: Result of COMPILER_VERSION() has NULL byte appended
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47620
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-07
13:45:18 UTC ---
Also seen on s390x:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675711
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36158
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ibolton at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #5 from Bryce Lelbach (wash)
2011-02-07 14:20:09 UTC ---
Sorry! Wasn't aware this was correct.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #18 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
14:22:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> > With Laurent's stub version of s-scaval.adb added as s-scaval-sh.adb and a
> > minor change to a ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in, sh-rtems now builds
> > A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47634
Summary: Incorrect checking of attribute format printf on
constructor of derived class with virtual base
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47615
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
14:50:43 UTC ---
;; basic block 2, loop depth 0, count 0
;; prev block 0, next block 11
;; pred: ENTRY [100.0%] (fallthru,exec)
;; succ: 11 [50.0%] (true,exec) 3 [50.0%] (false,exec)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36158
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36158
--- Comment #17 from Ian Bolton 2011-02-07
15:41:14 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> (In reply to comment #15)
>
> >
> > Is this going to be backported to 4.5? It is required to make CSHIFT
> > function
> > correctly.
>
> It may be pruden
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47632
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
16:20:17 UTC ---
We propagate D.2112_13 into the if, changing that to D.2112_22 != 0 and
remove the D.2112_13 def w/o cleaning up EH.
[LP 1] D.2112_13 = D.2112_22 + -1;
goto ;
# SUCC: 6 [100.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38644
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #34 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37440
Chung-Lin Tang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cltang at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
Seth Robertson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22946|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635
Summary: ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at
cp/name-lookup.c:1809
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora 2011-02-07 16:53:27
UTC ---
Created attachment 23266
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23266
testcase.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47615
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-02-07
16:58:20 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 7 16:58:17 2011
New Revision: 169888
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169888
Log:
2011-02-07 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47615
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Target Milestone|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
17:03:01 UTC ---
btw, your analysis at
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/214412 is bogus
There is no C++99, presumably you mean C++98
C++0x mode is absolutely not the default mode
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
17:17:54 UTC ---
Here's a reduced form of the code, which works with GCC 4.5 and earlier, but is
ambiguous with 4.6
#include
struct Key
{
Key() { }
Key(const Key&) { }
template
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36939
--- Comment #19 from Joel Sherrill 2011-02-07
17:22:59 UTC ---
Following up on my own comment. Dealing with targets without double precision
FPUs is a broader issue:
$ grep -r DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE . | grep "SIZE.*32" | grep -v .svn
./rx/rx.h:#defin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl
2011-02-07 17:43:25 UTC ---
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:12:00PM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-02-07
18:00:50 UTC ---
Great.
For the record, Bryce, the change to the standard was done by DR 180
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#180
see also
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-02-07
18:05:36 UTC ---
The testcase is bad, because for vanilla gcc releases there is no (prerelease)
etc. string at all (DEV-PHASE is empty), and because it hardcodes ASCII values,
so I'm afraid it could fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29931
--- Comment #5 from simonb at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07 18:10:21 UTC ---
Author: simonb
Date: Mon Feb 7 18:10:15 2011
New Revision: 169891
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169891
Log:
Auto-detect suitable default behaviour f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38403
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-02-07
18:21:23 UTC ---
> A brief look suggests the patch may only change var-tracking behavior, but
> it seems that is not the case.
Quite very brief then. :-) PR 43494 was a wrong code regression and
Alex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45375
--- Comment #39 from Mike Hommey 2011-02-07
18:40:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #38)
> Created attachment 23253 [details]
> failing testcase
>
> With current mainline and top of tree mozilla, things seems to go well, sqlite
> issues are gone.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829
--- Comment #31 from Mikael Morin 2011-02-07
18:49:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 23267
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23267
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #25 fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43829
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #21016|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl
2011-02-07 19:19:37 UTC ---
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 06:58:39PM +, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47633
>
> > if (ichar(v(n:n)) /= 41 .or. ichar(v(n+1:n+1)) /
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #26 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 19:37:16
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Kai?
>
> make[1]: Entering directory
> `/home/tschwinge/tmp/gnu-Elephant_Bird/src/gcc.obj/lto-plugin'
> /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --tag=disable-stati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47636
Summary: Powerpc rs6000.md uses RS6000_RECIP_HAVE_RSQRT_P
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47636
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47534
--- Comment #1 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07 20:00:14 UTC ---
Author: denisc
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:00:08 2011
New Revision: 169896
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169896
Log:
PR target/47534
* config/avr/li
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47560
--- Comment #6 from Benjamin Kosnik 2011-02-07
20:06:08 UTC ---
Author: bkoz
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:06:03 2011
New Revision: 169897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169897
Log:
2011-02-07 Benjamin Kosnik
PR libstdc++/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47172
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
--- Comment #11 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-07 20:15:59 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:15:48 2011
New Revision: 169899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169899
Log:
2011-02-07 Paolo Carlini
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47628
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47636
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2011-02-07
20:32:51 UTC ---
Author: meissner
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:32:45 2011
New Revision: 169901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169901
Log:
Fix PR target/47636
Modified:
trunk/gcc/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #27 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 20:32:24
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:32:17 2011
New Revision: 169900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169900
Log:
2011-02-07 Kai Tietz
PR lto/47225
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47636
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner 2011-02-07
20:35:02 UTC ---
Created attachment 23269
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23269
Patch that fixes the problem
Spell RS6000_RECIP_HAVE_RSQRTE_P correctly.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #63 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:41:54 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:41:50 2011
New Revision: 169902
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169902
Log:
PR target/47558
Add __ieee_divdc3 e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47481
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-07 20:48:48
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #26)
> (In reply to comment #23)
> Could you please test attached patch at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00469.html that it works for you?
I gues
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #64 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-07 20:52:40
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #63)
> Author: mrs
> Date: Mon Feb 7 20:41:50 2011
> New Revision: 169902
>
> URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169902
> Log:
> PR target/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
--- Comment #55 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:52:39 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Feb 7 20:52:33 2011
New Revision: 169903
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169903
Log:
PR target/42333
Add __ieee_divdc3 e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #29 from Kai Tietz 2011-02-07 20:53:32
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> (In reply to comment #26)
> > (In reply to comment #23)
>
> > Could you please test attached patch at
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00469.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
m...@gcc.gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47558
--- Comment #65 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-02-07 20:55:31 UTC ---
> /* The system ___divdc3 routine in libSystem on darwin10 is not
> accurate to 1ulp, ours is, so we avoid ever using the system name
> for this routine and instead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333
--- Comment #57 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07
20:56:32 UTC ---
I'll pre-approve a backport to 4.5.x if someone really wants it, should be very
safe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45248
--- Comment #11 from David Fang 2011-02-07
21:02:13 UTC ---
Any updates on this? re-confirmation? I would like to continue testing
gcc-4.5.x on powerpc-darwin8, but can't b/c of this.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #30 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-07 21:03:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #29)
> (In reply to comment #28)
> > (In reply to comment #26)
> > > (In reply to comment #23)
> >
> > > Could you please test attached patch at
> > > http://gcc.g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47349
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-07 21:05:04 UTC ---
The patch in comment #1 produces a couple of regressions. The following should
take care of most of them:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
=
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
--- Comment #5 from Steve Ellcey 2011-02-07 21:06:45
UTC ---
Author: sje
Date: Mon Feb 7 21:06:42 2011
New Revision: 169904
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169904
Log:
2011-02-07 Steve Ellcey
PR target/46997
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47324
--- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2011-02-07
21:07:59 UTC ---
The Apple linker developer has looked at the failing eh-alloc-1.C case and had
the following comments...
> Also, did you ever get a
> chance to look at the stackalign_testcase2.tar.bz2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47614
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23248|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47225
--- Comment #31 from Iain Sandoe 2011-02-07 21:22:10
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #30)
> (In reply to comment #29)
> > (In reply to comment #28)
> > > (In reply to comment #26)
> > > > (In reply to comment #23)
> > >
> > > > Could you please tes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46997
Steve Ellcey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47534
Joel Sherrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
