http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47284
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47288
Summary: Wrong operation of call by reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47288
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
--- Comment #19 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-14
09:00:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> (I asked on comp.lang.fortran)
Cf.
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/4b65b1cd206ce9fe
Or from the standard (F2008):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44341
--- Comment #11 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-14
09:54:54 UTC ---
Yeah, sorry, the *s were not supposed to be there in the variable names, only
in the help message. I fixed that shortly after posting the patch here, when I
first noticed the probl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Summary: internal compiler error: in tsubst_pack_expansion
(triggered by decltype)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
11:03:21 UTC ---
Doesn't reproduce for me on x86_64 with -m32.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47280
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #22 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-14
11:59:10 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Fri Jan 14 11:59:07 2011
New Revision: 168778
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168778
Log:
2011-01-14 Martin Jambor
PR middle-end/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47283
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-14
12:03:51 UTC ---
OK, I can reproduce this and will have a look. The first interesting
observation is that -g is necessary to trigger the error.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47281
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47286
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
12:15:48 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 12:15:43 2011
New Revision: 168779
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168779
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47281
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||46076
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47281
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47281
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
12:39:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 12:39:09 2011
New Revision: 168781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168781
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR middle-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
--- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
12:39:14 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 12:39:09 2011
New Revision: 168781
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168781
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR middle
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-14
13:08:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 14 13:08:02 2011
New Revision: 168782
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168782
Log:
PR c++/46688
* tree.c (build_vec_init_expr)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-14
13:08:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 14 13:08:11 2011
New Revision: 168783
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168783
Log:
PR c++/46903
* typeck2.c (check_narrowing):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46935
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47280
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
13:20:28 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 13:20:22 2011
New Revision: 168784
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168784
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47280
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
--- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-01-14 13:27:24 UTC ---
I have forgotten to give the optimization levels:
-O1 -O3
> gfc sincos_o.f904.23s8.32s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Summary: memory exhausted compiling a destructor with an
infinite 'for (;;);' loop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46926
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31249
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||46926
--- Comment #21 from Richard Gue
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|46926 |
--- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #2 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 13:42:03 UTC ---
Consider the following program test.c:
#include
struct s {
char a;
int b;
int* GetValp() { return &b; }
int& GetValr() { return b; }
} __attribute__((pack
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #3 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 13:44:04 UTC ---
This bug has to do with g++, not gcc. Should I delete this bug and re-submit?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in size_binop_loc
(fold-const.c:1427) with -g
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32684
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #4 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 14:04:19 UTC ---
The reason pointers and references are treated differently:
Consider the following code fragment:
struct s {
char a;
int b;
int* GetValp() { return &b; }
/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #5 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 14:08:26 UTC ---
Created attachment 22966
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22966
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47245
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Invalid immediate offset for Thumb
VFP store
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47082
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46807
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47190
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47290
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 from H.J
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
Summary: Violation of DWARF-3 spec for DW_FORM_strp
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:02:27 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 15:02:20 2011
New Revision: 168788
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168788
Log:
2011-01-14 Richard Guenther
PR tree-op
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47179
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47293
Summary: libquadmath: strtoflt128 - C99 hex floating point
format missing
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47292
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:19:29 UTC ---
I think RedHat 4.4.4 is nowhere close to FSF GCC 4.4.x what debug info
is concerned. Thus I would suggest to report this bug to RedHat
and/or try to reproduce the issue with a stoc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47293
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libquadmath: strtoflt128 - |libquadmath: strtoflt128 -
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #26 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
15:42:17 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 14 15:42:09 2011
New Revision: 168793
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168793
Log:
2011-01-14 Jan Hubicka
Jack Ho
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #6 from Waldemar Valdas Bancewicz 2011-01-14 15:42:57 UTC ---
About Comment #4:
This is a question to the GCC/G++ team. How are unaligned pointers dealt with?
I came up with the following possible options:
(1) Compiler inserts the fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47294
Summary: definition of function template can be
explicitly-qualified with a namespace it isn't a
member of
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14799
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46935
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries 2011-01-14
15:48:03 UTC ---
Related bug: PR 14799.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46817
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47294
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-14
15:58:21 UTC ---
some similarities to PR 42018
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
16:02:06 UTC ---
It works with
typedef int T __attribute__((aligned(1)));
struct s {
T a;
T& GetValr() { return a; }
} __attribute__((packed));
int main() {
struct s s1;
s1.GetVa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47295
Summary: libquadmath: List __complex128 and constants in the
.texi file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Summary: I/O Segfault when running out of file descriptors
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47291
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from H.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47297
Summary: Inconsistent float-point to integer results depending
on -O flag
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47297
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-01-14 17:04:30 UTC ---
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, mateusz at loskot dot net wrote:
> In spite of the fact the behavior is undefined, I suspect the intent
> is to be consistent (which appears to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47245
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
--- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw 2011-01-14
17:37:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 47245 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez 2011-01-14
18:18:07 UTC ---
Properly fixed here; awaiting approval.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01003.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-01-14 18:23:28
UTC ---
Proposed patch at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00916.html .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47219
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-01-14 18:27:40 UTC ---
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 bootstrap with Go included succeeded now (with a
couple of libgo patches already posted), make check still running, but
gcc/testsuite/go testr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth 2011-01-14 18:47:53
UTC ---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Jan 14 18:47:50 2011
New Revision: 168806
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168806
Log:
2011-01-08 Dominique d'Humieres
Rainer Orth
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45989
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38536
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment #20 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-14
19:48:26 UTC ---
The problems seems to be that opp->file is not set for scratch files
(STATUS_SCRATCH) when tempfile fails. Thus, open_external just returns.
Then, in new_unit in the error handling bl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47296
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47285
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle 2011-01-14
20:01:18 UTC ---
*** Bug 47284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47284
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
Summary: -O3 destroys beautifully vectorized code obtained at
-O2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-14
20:43:15 UTC ---
It's faster for me with -O3 (Athlon64, using -march=native).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-14 20:52:54 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> It's faster for me with -O3 (Athlon64, using -march=native).
well not on
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz
stepping
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47298
--- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele
2011-01-14 21:02:04 UTC ---
Actually, also on AMD I have at -O2 9.4s -O3 11.8s
model : 9
model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 6176 SE
stepping: 1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
Summary: Widening multiply optimization generates bad code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-01-14
21:26:50 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:26:47 2011
New Revision: 168822
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168822
Log:
PR c++/47289
* pt.c (coerce_template_parms)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13631
--- Comment #30 from François Dumont 2011-01-14
21:36:34 UTC ---
Created attachment 22967
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22967
locale message facet patch
Hi
Here is a patch proposition based on revision 168822. I can't ap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
--- Comment #1 from rguenther at suse dot de
2011-01-14 21:49:32 UTC ---
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47299
>
>Summary: Widening multiply optimization generate
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19162
--- Comment #15 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-14
21:50:17 UTC ---
Author: mrs
Date: Fri Jan 14 21:50:11 2011
New Revision: 168824
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168824
Log:
PR 19162
* objc-act.c (generate_str
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47289
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milesto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46933
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
