http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Error: SSA name in freelist but still
referenced
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266
Summary: Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as
"TREE_PUBLIC = 0" ("static function")
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimizati
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
Nicola Pero changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|major
--- Comment #2 from Nicola Pero 2011
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Summary: array constructor causing long compile times
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Known to fail|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Summary|DLLEXPOR
||2011.01.12 10:24:01
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-12 10:24:01
UTC ---
Confirmed with "gcc (GCC) 4.6.0 20110112 (experimental)".
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47268
Summary: Documentation: missing (Optional) keyword for
parameters of get_command_argument() and
get_environment_variable()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCO
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|ebotcazou at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Ian Bolton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #11 from Ian Bolton 2011-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-12
10:39:43 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:39:39 2011
New Revision: 168700
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168700
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47233
* opts.c (common
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org |mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #8 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
--- Comment #12 from Ian Bolton 2011-01-12
10:44:11 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Created attachment 22945 [details]
> Test patch
>
> Could you try the following? It's a variant of a patch Richard Sandiford
> recently posted.
Just noticed
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47233
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Blocks|45375
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:52:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:52:25 2011
New Revision: 168701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168701
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:53:24 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:21 2011
New Revision: 168702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168702
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:54:01 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:59 2011
New Revision: 168703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168703
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:54:38 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:54:36 2011
New Revision: 168704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168704
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47255
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46710
--- Comment #3 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-12 11:22:35
UTC ---
I just noticed that this failure was reported on 9 January 2011, but it is no
longer reported on 10 January 2011. What changed ?
I asked Matthias Klose if he has more information on hi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46993
--- Comment #1 from Arseny Klimovsky
2011-01-12 11:59:13 UTC ---
This bug is quite similar to another one in Debian BTS
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561611
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-12
12:04:45 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:04:39 2011
New Revision: 168708
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168708
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard Guenther
PR lto/472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRME
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-12
12:07:49 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 12:07:44 2011
New Revision: 168709
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168709
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard Guenther
PR other/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46946
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47264
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47239
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47216
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev
2011-01-12 13:10:07 UTC ---
For example, linux uses global reg var "esp". As there is no need to reserve
this register, can GCC accept it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-12
13:32:32 UTC ---
In 99.% of all cases there is a better way than using a global register
variable.
Also it is not clear to me how to merge translation units where a different
set of registers a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-12
13:37:53 UTC ---
Kai sent a draft patch. The issue is that TREE_PUBLIC/TREE_EXTERNAL should come
before setting the attribute - otherwise the decl seems to be inconsistent.
I try to submit the patch s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37273
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-12 13:38:20
UTC ---
First I think we need to note that if we allocate the pseudo holding the value
for "ext" in memory that we get some savings (because "ext" is already sitting
in memory waiting to be u
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46823
--- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor 2011-01-12
13:50:11 UTC ---
You're right, however in fact all redirections and updates should be
taking place already. Either in inline_transform() for calls that are
in the function from the beginning of inlin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47267
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47260
--- Comment #6 from Craig Powers 2011-01-12
14:11:28 UTC ---
I also was unable to get the procedure into a DLL with omission of DLLEXPORT,
instead attempting to get it in using a .DEF file and either gfortran or
dlltool. I'm not sure if that refl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=0
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46037
--- Comment #25 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-12
15:00:11 UTC ---
Testresults for lto-bootstrap with revised patch on x86_64-apple-darwin10...
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg01002.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-12
15:01:16 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:01:09 2011
New Revision: 168713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168713
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard Guenther
PR lto/472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269
Summary: DSYMUTIL_SPEC doesn't handle -gtoggle
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassig...@
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47259
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-01-12
15:22:08 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:21:59 2011
New Revision: 168715
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168715
Log:
2011-01-12 Richard Guenther
PR lto/472
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47270
Summary: [4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] GCC produces
unnecessary/wrong code on -O2 and -O3 levels
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka 2011-01-12
15:47:36 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Wed Jan 12 15:47:29 2011
New Revision: 168717
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168717
Log:
PR driver/47244
* gcc.c (PLUGIN_COND): Upda
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47244
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
Balakrishnan B changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||balakrishnan.erode at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
--- Comment #6 from Kai Tietz 2011-01-12 17:02:51
UTC ---
Author: ktietz
Date: Wed Jan 12 17:02:41 2011
New Revision: 168718
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168718
Log:
2011-01-12 Kai Tietz
PR debug/47209
* dwar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47209
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-12
17:10:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
>
> With the same object when accessed directly produces different results and
> when
> accessed using a pointer of same type produces a different result.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11750
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Schepler 2011-01-12
17:16:29 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > struct A {
> > virtual void f();
> > };
> > struct B : virtual A {
> > virtual void f();
> > };
> >
> > struct C : B , virtual A {
> > using
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47265
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Summary: gcc-4.6 -O1 -ftree-vectorize removes a test (if), the
function generates invalid outputs
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #1 from Victor Stinner
2011-01-12 18:54:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 22951
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22951
Example to reproduce the bug
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46941
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-01-12 19:42:38
UTC ---
It is caused by revision 160030:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2010-05/msg01089.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-01-12 20:00:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> [macbook] f90/bug% gfc -O2 pr35971_red.f90
> pr35971_red.f90: In function 'gp':
> pr35971_red.f90:67:0: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Summary: In addition to the bug uncovered in 42751, gcc can't
bootstrap using --with-cpu=power7
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-01-12 20:59:31 UTC ---
> sorry, I can not reproduce this at r168655 (plus patch from comment #7), at
> least not on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Do you only get this error with the
> patch, or also with
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-12
21:17:35 UTC ---
Created attachment 22952
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22952
preprocessed source
configured with
../gcc-4.6-20110108/configure --prefix=/home/redi/work/sandbo
||2011.01.12 21:21:12
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero 2011-01-12 21:21:12
UTC ---
Yes, confirmed with "gcc version 4.6.0 20110112 (experimental) (GCC)".
Thanks
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-12
21:34:13 UTC ---
./gcc/include/stddef.h is being included, but it doesn't define size_t
has the header guard _X86_64_ANSI_H_ but it appears that gcc's
stddef.h is expecting _MACHINE_ANSI_H_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2011-01-12
21:49:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> > pr35971_red.f90:67:0: internal compiler error: verify_stmts failed
I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with both -m32 and
-m64.
> I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47272
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner 2011-01-12
21:54:25 UTC ---
Note, the fixes for 47251 will be needed in addition to changes for this bug in
order to do a full bootstrap on a power7 system using the --with-cpu=power7
configure option.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres
2011-01-12 22:18:35 UTC ---
> I can reproduce this with a clean trunk on x86-64-linux with both -m32 and
> -m64.
I confirm that the ICE is not due to the patch.
> Regarding the test case: I think it is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47273
Summary: References to unaligned packed structure members not
allowed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47271
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47274
Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in lto_varpool_replace_node, at
lto-symtab.c:306
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46791
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46688
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-13
00:02:48 UTC ---
Author: redi
Date: Thu Jan 13 00:02:41 2011
New Revision: 168732
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168732
Log:
2011-01-13 Jonathan Wakely
PR libstdc++/47
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47045
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wake
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-01-13
00:28:20 UTC ---
actually it's not every arch - most still use _ANSI_H_ it's just x86 and x86-64
that are different
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47147
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22953|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46903
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39077
--- Comment #20 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-01-13 04:12:10
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg00797.html
Apparently I didn't format my subject line correctly...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47269
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth 2011-01-13
05:23:00 UTC ---
This seems impossible to implement without the addition of a logical AND to the
spec language and the ability to place parentheses. We have two cases which
have to be tested as true...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47240
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37829
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47275
Summary: ofstream::put(255) results in bad stream when built
with -fsigned-char on platforms that default to
unsigned char
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UN
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47275
--- Comment #1 from ceckak at frontier dot com 2011-01-13 06:40:17 UTC ---
Typo in the original description: fails at i=255 (not 256)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46240
--- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva 2011-01-13
07:27:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 22955
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22955
Patch that fixes the bug, testing with enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap-O3
Here's the patch I'm tes
93 matches
Mail list logo
