http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-26
22:18:23 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > * Modifiable members of targetm are a bad idea and make LTO-based
> > devirtualization harder (I'd rather targetm was const
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.5.2 |---
Summary|[4.5 regression
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-26 22:34:08 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> No. The optimization passes that are remotely related do not work
> flow or context sensitive, so we don't know whether the initialization
> takes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488
--- Comment #13 from Lance Kinley 2010-11-26 22:57:08
UTC ---
-O and -O2 are broken in 4.5.1 but work in the 4.5 and 4.6 snapshots.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-26
23:08:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> (In reply to comment #6)
>
> > No. The optimization passes that are remotely related do not work
> > flow or context sensitive, so we don't know whether
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46677
--- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-26 23:45:16 UTC ---
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010, amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> > * All the macros relating to the sizes of various C types in bits should
> > be replaced by hooks that are
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46678
Summary: [4.6 Regression] Wrong code with strings
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46678
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||domob at gcc dot gnu.org,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46678
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-27
00:35:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> testing: r162217 (589550ff51f6645a92a0538f31953b94e40585b4)
> testing: r162219 (c5faa79924f2b5c58fd21b6bd2416836985dfc25)
Forgot to change that: The fir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46679
Summary: fold_binary changes types in divisionm breaking
configure -enable-checking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46680
Summary: Suboptimal code generated for bool comparisons
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46681
Summary: insn-recog.c is too taxing on bootstrap compiler
(Apple gcc 4.0.1)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46681
--- Comment #1 from Jay 2010-11-27 01:09:47 UTC
---
Actually running make again doesn't fix it.
And machine is nearly single-tasking at the moment.
I'll try without -disable-bootstrap.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46681
--- Comment #2 from Jay 2010-11-27 01:14:57 UTC
---
Trying again with ulimit -d unlimited.
I wonder if something like can/should be automated, like with some wrapper
executable.
Notice I'm using -enable-checking.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46681
--- Comment #3 from Jay 2010-11-27 01:39:30 UTC
---
no luck with ulimit -- I should have known since it is mmap
trying w/o -disable-bootstra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2010-11-27
02:07:08 UTC ---
Backtrace:
Breakpoint 1, default_no_named_section (name=0x7afad8f0 ".text.startup",
flags=2097408, decl=0x7afa6900) at ../../gcc/gcc/varasm.c:5994
5994 gcc_unreachable ();
(g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46678
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin 2010-11-27
04:20:08 UTC ---
> I'm going to try removing assert.
>
> It should be noted that on 32-bit HP-UX we create multiple unamed "sections"
> (subspaces) in an object.
Doesn't work. Section handling i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46682
Summary: __sync_bool_compare_and_swap generates wrong code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46681
Jack Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46680
Dmitry Gorbachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46675
Uros Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
101 - 122 of 122 matches
Mail list logo