http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
Summary: Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lto
AssignedTo: un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 20:44:14
UTC ---
With testcase at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/wrf.ltrans2.o.gz
I got
[...@gnu-4 build_base_lto.]$
/export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665
Summary: two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta
-fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigne
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581
--- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 22:05:06 UTC ---
Author: janus
Date: Thu Nov 25 22:04:59 2010
New Revision: 167154
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167154
Log:
2010-11-25 Janus Weil
PR fortran/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #34 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25
23:38:09 UTC ---
I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this patchset and I could
decrease it quite a bit, even though there is still room for improvement. On a
testcase of mine, I sta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #35 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25
23:43:02 UTC ---
OK, my browser screwed up my last comment.
Here is another attempt of the same. Sorry.
I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this
patchset and I could decrease it qu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4
Summary: gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage
(cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263
--- Comment #36 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-26
00:15:05 UTC ---
Awesome!
I still think that the output would be better if it was more consistent with
the current way of printing template instantiations, that is, using "note:
while expanding
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635
Ádám Rák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||adam.rak at streamnovation
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
Summary: Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a
section type conflict" error in libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667
Zdenek Sojka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #1 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unass
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-26 01:41:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 22535
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22535
invalid autoreduced testcase
Reproduced at x86_86-linux, r167127 and r167147. Attached is autoreduced
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46670
Summary: ICE with 4.6.0 2010-11-26 with c++0x, in TBB's
header
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
from Brad Jackson 2010-11-26
03:03:04 UTC ---
This crash was not in the 20101104 weekly snapshot, but has been in all
snapshots since, including 20101125.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26
04:25:37 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Nov 26 04:25:32 2010
New Revision: 167160
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167160
Log:
PR other/46020
* configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46258
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26
04:27:33 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Nov 26 04:27:24 2010
New Revision: 167162
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167162
Log:
PR debug/46258
* tree-cfg.c (replace_uses_by): D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020
--- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26
04:29:45 UTC ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Fri Nov 26 04:29:41 2010
New Revision: 167163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167163
Log:
PR other/46020
* configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in default_no_named_section, at
varasm .c:5994
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46587
--- Comment #1 from Alexey Voinov 2010-11-26
05:50:07 UTC ---
Tested it with "gcc version 4.6.0 20101106 (experimental) (GCC)". The bug is
still there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468
--- Comment #7 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:26:56 UTC ---
.o hunting converged on dlls/ntdll/thread.o
however:
$ diff -u bad.lst good.lst
--- bad.lst 2010-11-26 08:25:05.0 +0100
+++ good.lst2010-11-26 08:25:12.00
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468
--- Comment #8 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:31:39 UTC ---
when I add
-fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
it goes back to the "good" behaviour.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26
07:43:34 UTC ---
Thanks. That's a known endian problem. I have a patch which works on PowerPC,
which I still have to commit.
101 - 129 of 129 matches
Mail list logo