[Bug lto/46664] New: Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO

2010-11-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664 Summary: Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: un

[Bug lto/46664] Failed to build 481.wrf in SPEC CPU 2006 with LTO

2010-11-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46664 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 20:44:14 UTC --- With testcase at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/devel/gcc/lto/wrf.ltrans2.o.gz I got [...@gnu-4 build_base_lto.]$ /export/gnu/import/svn/gcc-test-spec/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-

[Bug rtl-optimization/46665] New: two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

2010-11-25 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665 Summary: two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug rtl-optimization/46649] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_bb_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:5080 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

2010-11-25 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigne

[Bug fortran/46581] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] segfault in SELECT TYPE with associate-name

2010-11-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581 --- Comment #4 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 22:05:06 UTC --- Author: janus Date: Thu Nov 25 22:04:59 2010 New Revision: 167154 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167154 Log: 2010-11-25 Janus Weil PR fortran/4

[Bug fortran/46581] [4.6 Regression] [OOP] segfault in SELECT TYPE with associate-name

2010-11-25 Thread janus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46581 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46665] two gfortran tests fail with -O[2s] -fipa-pta -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-forwprop

2010-11-25 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46665 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

2010-11-25 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #34 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25 23:38:09 UTC --- I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this patchset and I could decrease it quite a bit, even though there is still room for improvement. On a testcase of mine, I sta

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

2010-11-25 Thread dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #35 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-25 23:43:02 UTC --- OK, my browser screwed up my last comment. Here is another attempt of the same. Sorry. I have worked on decreasing the memory consumption of this patchset and I could decrease it qu

[Bug target/46666] New: gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining

2010-11-25 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4 Summary: gcc.target/i386/funcspec-3.c ICEs in count_reg_usage (cse.c:6596) with -fno-early-inlining Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/7263] __extension__ keyword doesn't suppress warning on LL or ULL constants

2010-11-25 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7263 --- Comment #36 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-26 00:15:05 UTC --- Awesome! I still think that the output would be better if it was more consistent with the current way of printing template instantiations, that is, using "note: while expanding

[Bug c++/18635] use of uninitialised reference accepted in C++ front end

2010-11-25 Thread adam.rak at streamnovation dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18635 Ádám Rák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adam.rak at streamnovation |

[Bug regression/46667] New: Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++

2010-11-25 Thread John.Tytgat at aaug dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667 Summary: Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++ Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical

[Bug regression/46667] Target arm-unknown-eabi build results in "causes a section type conflict" error in libstdc++

2010-11-25 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46667 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz --- Comment #1 fro

[Bug libfortran/46584] FAIL: gfortran.dg/quad_1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)

2010-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46584 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/46668] New: FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90

2010-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668 Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unass

[Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

2010-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46645] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: 20_util/unique_ptr/requirements/explicit_instantiation/explicit_instantiation.cc

2010-11-25 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46645 --- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka 2010-11-26 01:41:24 UTC --- Created attachment 22535 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22535 invalid autoreduced testcase Reproduced at x86_86-linux, r167127 and r167147. Attached is autoreduced

[Bug c++/46670] New: ICE with 4.6.0 2010-11-26 with c++0x, in TBB's header

2010-11-25 Thread jeffrey.donner at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46670 Summary: ICE with 4.6.0 2010-11-26 with c++0x, in TBB's header Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/46651] ICE with graphite enabled in cairo-1.8.10

2010-11-25 Thread bjackson at inavia dot net
from Brad Jackson 2010-11-26 03:03:04 UTC --- This crash was not in the 20101104 weekly snapshot, but has been in all snapshots since, including 20101125.

[Bug fortran/46020] Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1 character return type

2010-11-25 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:25:37 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:25:32 2010 New Revision: 167160 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167160 Log: PR other/46020 * configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):

[Bug debug/46258] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr23820.c: -fcompare-debug failure with -O3 -ffloat-store

2010-11-25 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46258 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:27:33 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:27:24 2010 New Revision: 167162 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167162 Log: PR debug/46258 * tree-cfg.c (replace_uses_by): D

[Bug fortran/46020] Improve error string for BIND(C) diagnostic for len>1 character return type

2010-11-25 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46020 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva 2010-11-26 04:29:45 UTC --- Author: aoliva Date: Fri Nov 26 04:29:41 2010 New Revision: 167163 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167163 Log: PR other/46020 * configure.ac (CXX_FOR_TARGET):

[Bug other/46026] [trans-mem] Unable to build libitm on Solaris/x86

2010-11-25 Thread aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46026 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46671] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in default_no_named_section, at varasm .c:5994

2010-11-25 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46671 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in default_no_named_section, at varasm .c:5994 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46587] ICE when instantiating template member function in another template member

2010-11-25 Thread crexfexpex at yandex dot ru
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46587 --- Comment #1 from Alexey Voinov 2010-11-26 05:50:07 UTC --- Tested it with "gcc version 4.6.0 20101106 (experimental) (GCC)". The bug is still there.

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

2010-11-25 Thread marcus at jet dot franken.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #7 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:26:56 UTC --- .o hunting converged on dlls/ntdll/thread.o however: $ diff -u bad.lst good.lst --- bad.lst 2010-11-26 08:25:05.0 +0100 +++ good.lst2010-11-26 08:25:12.00

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

2010-11-25 Thread marcus at jet dot franken.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #8 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-26 07:31:39 UTC --- when I add -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables it goes back to the "good" behaviour.

[Bug fortran/46668] FAIL: gfortran.dg/transfer_simplify_10.f90

2010-11-25 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46668 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-26 07:43:34 UTC --- Thanks. That's a known endian problem. I have a patch which works on PowerPC, which I still have to commit.

<    1   2