[Bug bootstrap/45888] tm.texi generation is not portable, rule is broken

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45888 --- Comment #15 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke 2010-11-25 08:02:28 UTC --- Author: amylaar Date: Thu Nov 25 08:02:13 2010 New Revision: 167137 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167137 Log: 2010-11-25 Joern Rennecke Ra

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 08:05:01 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Nov 25 08:04:46 2010 New Revision: 167138 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167138 Log: 2010-11-25 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #5 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-25 08:12:28 UTC --- i can reproduce this. I will try to bisect which file of wine gets miscompiled to get a smaller testcase.

[Bug fortran/42112] overloaded function with allocatable result problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug inline-asm/46573] wrong "opcode is not supported on this processor" error message on MIPS 4KSD.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46573 Momchil Uzunov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46653] New: [trans-mem] ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46653 Summary: [trans-mem] ICE with volatile int in transactional constructor using -O1 Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/42112] overloaded function with allocatable result problem

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42112 --- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 08:54:10 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > One probably needs: > > a) If "a" is no TARGET: > deallocate (a) > f(&a) ... which has with -fno-realloc-lhs issues when bound checking is enabled. (I

[Bug c++/46654] New: [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 Summary: [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement Product: gcc Version: trans-mem Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/46654] [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-25 08:58:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22525 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22525 testcase with volatile in transaction.

[Bug c++/46654] [trans-mem] "volatile" objects must not be allowed in a safe statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46654 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||trans-mem Severity|normal

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 09:02:54 UTC --- Author: burnus Date: Thu Nov 25 09:02:33 2010 New Revision: 167139 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167139 Log: 2010-11-25 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/46

[Bug fortran/46638] Wrong result with TRANSFER from string to DT

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46638 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46300] Calls to internals _ITM_cxa_throw and _ITM_cxa_allocate_exception are not marked as safe

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46300 Patrick Marlier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-25 09:42:35 UTC --- *** Bug 46649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug rtl-optimization/46649] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_bb_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:5080 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Marlier 2010-11-25 09:57:32 UTC --- Created attachment 22526 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22526 another testcase It seems not completely solved. Here a another testcase. With -O0, it complains

[Bug rtl-optimization/46602] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/pr42245-2.c ICE on ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46602 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-25 09:59:17 UTC --- Author: amonakov Date: Thu Nov 25 09:59:03 2010 New Revision: 167140 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167140 Log: PR rtl-optimization/46602 * sel-sche

[Bug target/46468] enabling -fomit-frame-pointer by default breaks Wine

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46468 --- Comment #6 from marcus at jet dot franken.de 2010-11-25 10:01:26 UTC --- first wine search converged on ntdll.dll.so being miscompiled (as i expected to some degree). i will tomorrow focus on the specific object files.

[Bug lto/46652] undefined reference to '__udivdi3' with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652 Dmitry Gorbachev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot

[Bug target/46655] New: AIX6.1 native assembler requires '.line' numbers greater than zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 Summary: AIX6.1 native assembler requires '.line' numbers greater than zero Product: gcc Version: 4.5.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-25 10:05:08 UTC --- Author: amonakov Date: Thu Nov 25 10:05:00 2010 New Revision: 167141 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167141 Log: PR rtl-optimization/46585 * sel-sche

[Bug rtl-optimization/46602] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/pr42245-2.c ICE on ia64

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46602 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46585] [4.6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in vinsn_create (sel-sched-ir.c:1189) with -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46585 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/46655] AIX6.1 native assembler requires '.line' numbers greater than zero

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 Michael Haubenwallner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0

[Bug fortran/46656] New: libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 Summary: libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c/46657] New: Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Summary: Didn't check an array's boundary Product: gcc Version: 4.4.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug lto/46652] undefined reference to '__udivdi3' with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46652 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/42690] Undefined reference errors with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42690 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dann at ics dot uci.edu --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/45685] [4.6 Regression] missed conditional move opportunity in loop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45685 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schuh.robert at gmail dot

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID Severity

[Bug fortran/46539] libquadmath: Add -static-libquadmath

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46539 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 11:22:08 UTC --- cf. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-11/msg00348.html

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2010-11-25 11:22:59 UTC --- *** Bug 46657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Manue

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 schuh.robert at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from Jonathan

[Bug c/35587] -Warray-bounds does not work at all or does not find all trivial cases, and :works only with -O2 or -O3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35587 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-25 11:42:54 UTC --- *** Bug 46657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/46658] New: internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Summary: internal compiler error on cp/init.c Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #1 from Zara 2010-11-25 11:51:51 UTC --- Created attachment 22528 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22528 preprocessed output from g++ The file has been compressed with tar/gz

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #2 from Zara 2010-11-25 11:53:29 UTC --- gcc has been downloaded form git mirror.

[Bug c/46657] Didn't check an array's boundary

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46657 --- Comment #7 from schuh.robert at gmail dot com 2010-11-25 12:10:19 UTC --- I didn't notice that. I'm really sorry about that.

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #16 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 12:13:14 UTC --- In your dump files there is a CFG inconsistency that I can't reproduce. At least basic block numbers are not consistent. I also see DEBUG insns in stagefeedback but not stageprof

[Bug target/46548] Build arm gcc failure after patch 165463

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46548 Paul Brook changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46655] invalid '.line 0' directive emitted with -g

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655 --- Comment #3 from Michael Haubenwallner 2010-11-25 12:30:37 UTC --- Huh - AIX-as also doesn't accept line numbers >=65536 any more since SP6100-04-07-1036 it seems, as I get an error on ".line 118674" from insn-automata.c later in bootstrap of g

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #17 from Richard G

Re: [Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

> we do CFG manipulations based on debug stmts (verified with a later > assert that triggers on -O2 -g -fprofile-use). > > It's of course unfortunate that we do this BB splitting at all when > not doing coverage test. The BB splitting is neccesary so the CFG can be solved (i.e. you have explicit

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-25 12:56:35 UTC --- > we do CFG manipulations based on debug stmts (verified with a later > assert that triggers on -O2 -g -fprofile-use). > > It's of course unfortunate that we do this BB splitting at al

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-25 13:40:30 UTC --- It would be nice if you could reduce the testcase a bit by using Delta or other means: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction

[Bug middle-end/46647] Can't inline memset with -1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46647 --- Comment #11 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-25 13:48:06 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Nov 25 13:47:42 2010 New Revision: 167146 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167146 Log: Properly cast integer constant char. gcc/

[Bug lto/46648] [4.6 Regression] type mismatch in array reference; verify_stmts failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46648 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Zara changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22528|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Zara changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22527|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #7 from Zara 2010-11-25 14:44:12 UTC --- Created attachment 22531 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22531 And this is the intemediate file!! 335 bytes I hope this minimum case will be just what you need to correct t

[Bug c++/46658] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 --- Comment #8 from Zara 2010-11-25 14:44:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > It would be nice if you could reduce the testcase a bit by using Delta or > other > means: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/A_guide_to_testcase_reduction Manually reduced it

[Bug c++/46658] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.5.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug libstdc++/46659] New: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Summary: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 --- Comment #1 from Jerry DeLisle 2010-11-25 15:11:39 UTC --- Nothing shows here on x86-64-linux

[Bug c++/45940] [trans-mem] Error of unsafe function even if annotated

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45940 Vincent Gramoli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Version|unknown

[Bug c++/46658] [4.6 Regression] internal compiler error on cp/init.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46658 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at redhat dot com --- Comment #10 from H.

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-25 15:45:58 UTC --- the changes in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2010-11/msg00131.html might help

[Bug c++/46401] [4.5 Regression] very slow compile time with -Wsequence-point

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46401 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 15:59:18 UTC --- Works with GCC version ... ?

[Bug tree-optimization/46494] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed when casting-out attribute noreturn with -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-fre -ftree-vrp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46494 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-11-25 16:05:36 UTC --- Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02569.html fixes the problem? For future bug reports, please use gcc -v -save-t

[Bug middle-end/46534] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE optimizing printf ("...>10MBstring\n") into puts

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46534 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/46499] [4.5/4.6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051021-1.c FAILs with -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-ccp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46499 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug c++/46538] [4.3/4.4./4.5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in cp_make_fname_decl (decl.c:3690) on invalid code when using __PRETTY_FUNCTION__

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46538 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/46614] [4.5 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-strided-u8-i8-gap4.c FAILs with -fno-rename-registers -fsched2-use-superblocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46614 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to fail|

[Bug fortran/46656] libgfortran: Integer write: uninitialised value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46656 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46114] [4.6 regression] g++ SEGV when built with gld on Solaris 10+/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46114 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-25 16:25:35 UTC --- > --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt 2010-11-25 > 16:05:36 UTC --- > Can you go back to the failing sources and test whether > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patche

[Bug middle-end/46488] [4.5 regression] server/core_filters.c from apache httpd 2.2.17 miscompiled with optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46488 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-25 16:34:32 UTC --- Does the problem only happen at -O3 with the 4.5.x snapshot, i.e. do compilations with bare -O or -O2 generate working executables?

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-25 16:50:50 UTC --- Thus, isn't what the program does equivalent to REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), ALLOCATABLE :: z REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), POINTER:: y y=>z which is invalid? Valid w

[Bug libffi/46660] New: cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46660 Summary: cls_double_va.c, cls_longdouble_va.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libffi Assigne

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org Seve

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #11 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-11-25 17:00:19 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thus, isn't what the program does equivalent to > > REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), ALLOCATABLE :: z > REAL(dp), DIMENSION(:, :, :), POINTER::

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #12 from Michael Matz 2010-11-25 17:02:19 UTC --- The following needs to be taken into account when determining the validity: If this use is supposed to be valid (we can associate a pointer with and entity that isn't marked TARGET but

[Bug libffi/46661] New: 32-bit cls_pointer.c, cls_pointer_stack.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46661 Summary: 32-bit cls_pointer.c, cls_pointer_stack.c FAIL on IRIX 6.5 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug fortran/45586] [4.6 Regression] ICE non-trivial conversion at assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45586 --- Comment #13 from Michael Matz 2010-11-25 17:07:10 UTC --- > no, your example here is different, and is not allowed. The original > testcase is fine. > > so y=>a%b%c%d%z > > is allowed as soon as any of a, b, c, or d or z have the pointer

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-25 17:43:35 UTC --- I started profiledbootstrap tracking: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-11/msg00378.html

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-25 18:01:00 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Nov 25 18:00:47 2010 New Revision: 167148 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167148 Log: PR middle-end/46637 * combine.c (try_combin

[Bug fortran/46662] New: [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 Summary: [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp() Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 18:08:45 UTC --- Asked at J3: http://j3-fortran.org/pipermail/j3/2010-November/004015.html

[Bug middle-end/46637] [4.6 Regression] SIGSEGV in if_then_else_cond - too deep recursion

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46637 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/46662] [OOP] gfortran rejects CALL polymorphic%abstract_type%tbp()

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46662 --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-25 18:14:23 UTC --- Some data points: gfortran 4.6 and NAG 5.2 reject the program; Crayftn accepts the program - but it also accepts the program with a deferred TBP - and ICEs.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46649] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in move_bb_info, at sel-sched-ir.c:5080 with -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46649 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora 2010-11-25 18:40:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Let's add Francois in CC, he knows STLPort pretty well. And somebody should > profile this difference, redo the tests for current mainline (which already > h

[Bug tree-optimization/46663] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_recog_pow_pattern (gimple.h:2055) with -O -fexceptions -ftree-vectorize

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46663 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in vect_recog_pow_pattern (gimple.h:2055) with -O -fexceptions -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/46528] [4.6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46528 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #20 from Uros Bizjak 2010-

[Bug fortran/46339] ICE (segfault) in gfc_trans_pointer_assignment

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46339 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.sagan at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/34640] ICE when assigning item of a derived-component to a pointer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot |

  1   2   >