[Bug driver/46516] gfortran-trunk: error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-11-17 08:02:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I suppose it's the --disable-multilib, but I don't know why. Yes, it is certainly this. The driver seems to search only in the lib directory and not in

[Bug driver/46516] gfortran-trunk: error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-17 08:20:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > (In reply to comment #4) > > I suppose it's the --disable-multilib, but I don't know why. > > Yes, it is certainly this. The driver seems to search only in

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Ho

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joseph at codesourcery dot

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-11-17 08:46:11 UTC --- mine look like: static const char *const multilib_raw[] = { ". !m64 !m32;", ".:../lib64 m64 !m32;", ".:../lib !m64 m32;", NULL }; however, I just observe that the libgomp.spec a

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #9 from Joost VandeVondele 2010-11-17 08:50:06 UTC --- FYI, with strace I see following things being searched for the specs: access("/data/vondele/gcc_bench/gcc_trunk/build/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.6.0/", X_OK) = 0 access("

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #10 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-17 09:27:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > however, I just observe that the libgomp.spec are causing no problems in my > build. Are they actually read? Even here, where I use multilib and the gfortr

[Bug c/46517] New: Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46517 Summary: Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization Product: gcc Version: 4.4.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/46455] resource leaks due to missing destructors for mutexes and condvars

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455 --- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-17 09:37:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #29) > because __gthread_mutex_destroy returns void. Argh, why is gthr-win32.h different here?! Nevermind ... > after changing the return types of the _S_des

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-17 09:40:52 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Are they actually read? Sorry, I tested wrongly. One needs to have both -fopenmp *and* one needs to link. Then I also sees "Read specs" + strace for libgo

[Bug c/46460] warn for shifting more than the bits in the (promoted) type is undefined

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46460 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lepinat at free dot fr --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c/46517] Wrong result on left shift operator without optimization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46517 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46312] gcc.dg/vec-scal-opt2.c fails for ARM targets.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46312 --- Comment #11 from irar at gcc dot gnu.org 2010-11-17 10:00:34 UTC --- Author: irar Date: Wed Nov 17 10:00:27 2010 New Revision: 166860 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166860 Log: PR tree-optimization/46312

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-17 10:25:40 UTC --- And the reason why it only shows up on ia64 is because it uses vectorization factor 2 instead of 4 that is used on x86_64/i386+sse2. With: int id[16][16][17] id[i][1][0+1] is actually

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 10:43:25 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 10:43:21 2010 New Revision: 166861 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166861 Log: 2010-11-16 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug c++/46513] Request: Warning for use of unsafe string handling functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46513 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-17 10:43:51 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > I know "finding the replacement" is not a GCC issue, but perhaps folks who > need > to the *nix safe string gear can use TR24731-2 (not TR24731-1), which

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 10:46:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 10:46:36 2010 New Revision: 166862 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166862 Log: 2010-11-17 Richard Guenther PR tree-op

[Bug middle-end/45838] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/pr34513.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-17 11:15:59 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 11:15:55 2010 New Revision: 166863 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166863 Log: PR middle-end/45838 * tree-ssa-alias.c (re

[Bug middle-end/45838] [4.6 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/pr34513.c execution test

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45838 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/46498] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in eliminate_unnecessary_stmts, at tree-ssa-dce.c:1112 with -O -funsafe-math-optimizations -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-reassoc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46498 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/46502] collect2 LTO marker detection is fragile wrt. to nm output format

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46502 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 11:41:11 UTC --- The marker should be removed.

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/46513] Request: Warning for use of unsafe string handling functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46513 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-17 11:50:16 UTC --- On Wed, 17 Nov 2010, noloader at gmail dot com wrote: > I stand corrected: C1X draft dated 2010-10-04 now includes the bounds checking > interfaces. See "C1X Draft", >

[Bug lto/46505] LTO miscompiled 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46505 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 11:50:51 UTC --- Hm, worked for me last time. Re-checking with r166798.

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 11:51:23 UTC --- Hm, worked for me last time. Re-checking with r166798.

[Bug c/46509] -Wparentheses shouldn't warn about: A || Y && "foo"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46509 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #12 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-11-17 11:55:29 UTC --- In I discussed issues relating to finding specs in the presence of multilib paths. I hope this - and Natha

[Bug lto/46505] LTO miscompiled 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46505 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-17 12:05:28 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 12:05:24 2010 New Revision: 166865 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166865 Log: PR testsuite/45429 * gcc.dg/vect/no-section

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 12:05:24 UTC --- Tonto works for me.

[Bug c/46509] -Wparentheses shouldn't warn about: A || Y && "foo"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46509 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug testsuite/45429] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-64.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45429 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from H.J.

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 12:53:39 UTC --- Failures look like spawn [open ...]^M FAIL: InterfaceDispatch -findirect-dispatch execution - source compiled test UNTESTED: InterfaceDispatch -findirect-dispatch output - source compiled t

[Bug middle-end/46515] [4.6 Regression] Many libjava failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46515 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 12:54:35 UTC --- It is on Linux/x86-64.

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-17 13:02:34 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Nov 17 13:02:31 2010 New Revision: 166867 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166867 Log: PR rtl-optimization/46440 * combine.c (upda

[Bug rtl-optimization/46440] [4.5 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.6.0 Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regress

[Bug target/39064] libiberty md5.h needs uintptr_t

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39064 --- Comment #4 from nightstrike 2010-11-17 13:13:44 UTC --- *** Bug 46464 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug other/46464] libiberty pointer size assumptions for Win64 incorrect

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46464 nightstrike changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 13:19:07 UTC --- Created attachment 22429 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22429 The src.alt for 465.tonto Can you try this alternate source for tonto with -O3 -funroll-loops -ffast-math

[Bug lto/46506] LTO miscompiled 465.tonto in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46506 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 13:36:03 UTC --- I have different alternate source, calling destroy_ptr_part_ instead. But I can't parse the perl patch, so I'm not 100% sure.

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot |

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 14:08:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > P1 sounds a little overrated, it's a specialized option and an artificial > test. > Only IA-64 really uses this thing, right? All regressions towards th

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 14:08:35 UTC --- Btw, the scheduler guys have a fix in the works already.

[Bug fortran/46518] New: internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 Summary: internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 14:52:42 UTC --- Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin suppresses the ICE.

[Bug target/46519] New: Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 Summary: Missing vzeroupper Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/46086] fail to build gcc 4.5.2 on sparc64-portbld-freebsd9.0 - configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46086 --- Comment #12 from Anton Shterenlikht 2010-11-17 15:09:20 UTC --- yes, GMP fails 14 tests: http://seis.bris.ac.uk/~mexas/gmp-5.0.1-regression-test.log I submitted a bug report to gmp-bugs. MPFR passes all tests. Sorry, I should've checked be

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 15:11:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Do you know whether this is present on x86_64-linux? I am unable to do a --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap using... http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-1

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[C++0x] Defaulted vs|[C++0x] [4.6 Regression]

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov 2010-11-17 15:29:33 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin > suppresses the ICE. Is that in relation to bootstrap flags? There's no PIC

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-17 15:31:36 UTC --- > Btw, the scheduler guys have a fix in the works already. Then they should assign the PR to someone to avoid duplicating efforts.

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #13 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-17 15:32:34 UTC --- Some debugging: While for libgfortran.spec and libgomp.spec the call to gcc.c's find_a_file and thus to for_each_path is the same, the global variable multilib_os_dir is NULL for libg

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 15:33:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin > > suppresses the ICE. > > Is that in relation to boo

[Bug rtl-optimization/45652] [4.6 Regression] gcc.dg/compat/scalar-by-value-3 FAILs with -O2 -fselective-scheduling2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45652 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigne

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 15:44:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Only occurs for -fPIC on x86_64-apple-darwin10. Adding -fno-PIC on darwin > > suppresses the ICE. > > Is that in relation to boo

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-17 15:47:20 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Nov 17 15:47:17 2010 New Revision: 166870 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166870 Log: 2010-11-17 Richard Guenther PR lto/465

[Bug fortran/46520] New: libquadmath: Build also with --enable-languages=c; fails with some cross targets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46520 Summary: libquadmath: Build also with --enable-languages=c; fails with some cross targets Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/46521] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fprofile-generate -fno-early-inlining

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46521 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -Os -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fprofile-generate -fno-early-inlining

[Bug lto/46504] LTO failed on 483.xalancbmk in SPEC CPU 2006

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46504 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/46522] New: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -O3 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -funroll-loops

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46522 Summary: ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7092 with -O3 -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling2 -funroll-loops Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0

[Bug c/20385] Lame parse error message for undefined type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20385 --- Comment #9 from Paolo Bonzini 2010-11-17 16:14:32 UTC --- Another case in which we still do not detect the unsigned type is after declspecs: typedef uintt16_t pid_t; extern uintt16_t x; I think that until this is fixed, there are still enou

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22334|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

-quiet -dumpbase pr42294.f -m32 -mtune=generic -march=x86-64 -auxbase-strip pr42294.s -O -O2 -version -fselective-scheduling2 -fsel-sched-pipelining -funroll-all-loops -o pr42294.s -fintrinsic-modules-path finclude GNU Fortran (GCC) version 4.6.0 20101117 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug driver/46516] Non-multilib search problem in gcc.c / gfortran error: libgfortran.spec: No such file or directory

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46516 --- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-17 16:25:56 UTC --- Suggested solution from Joseph on #gcc: - get rid of the spec file (hooray!) - Add a configure test. One needs to make sure that both the compiler supports __float128 and the libgcc

[Bug tree-optimization/46523] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-

[Bug tree-optimization/46523] [4.6 Regression] ICE: error: inlined_to pointer set for noninline callers, multiple inline callers

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46523 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0 --- Comment #1 from Richard Guen

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

-darwin10.5.0/bin/ -B/sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/lib/ -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/include -isystem /sw/lib/gcc4.6/x86_64-apple-darwin10.5.0/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp/config/bsd -I.

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #8 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 16:37:14 UTC --- Backtraces as... gdb /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/cc1 ... (gdb) r -quiet -v -I . -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #9 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 16:38:11 UTC --- sorry...comment 8 ended up in the wrong PR

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 16:38:47 UTC --- Backtraces as... gdb /sw/src/fink.build/gcc46-4.6.0-1000/darwin_objdir/./gcc/cc1 ... (gdb) r -quiet -v -I . -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp -I ../../../gcc-4.6-20101117/libgomp

[Bug c++/46269] [trans-mem] internal compiler error in expand_block_tm of trans-mem.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/46497] [C++0x] Defaulted vs declared move constructor vs is_convertible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46497 --- Comment #7 from Paolo Carlini 2010-11-17 16:44:21 UTC --- Ok, I'm still digesting all of this (and in the meanwhile we also realized that likely we have problems in the specs of std::is_convertible itself, in the library). Something still puz

[Bug rtl-optimization/45352] ICE: in reset_sched_cycles_in_current_ebb, at sel-sched.c:7058

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45352 --- Comment #21 from Andrey Belevantsev 2010-11-17 16:47:00 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > Comment on attachment 22334 [details] > testcase failing in r166433 > > Opened PR46521 and PR46522 for the new two testcases. This one wasn't really

[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337 Ralf Wildenhues changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rwild at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/46524] New: Code size regression due to not reusing immediate operands of moves

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46524 Summary: Code size regression due to not reusing immediate operands of moves Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug lto/46525] New: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46525 Summary: [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassig...@

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-17 18:42:29 UTC --- Does the patch at [1] also fix this test? [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01802.html

[Bug target/46519] Missing vzeroupper

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46519 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 18:49:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Does the patch at [1] also fix this test? > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01802.html No, that is for a different case.

[Bug lto/46525] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46525 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu 2010-11-17 18:56:09 UTC --- Revision 166872 gave: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2010-11/msg00230.html xgcc: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program lto1) Please submit a full bug report, with prep

[Bug target/40171] GCC does not pass -mtune and -march options to assembler!

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40171 --- Comment #6 from Dzianis Kahanovich 2010-11-17 19:15:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22434 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22434 atune.patch Yes, I read maillist archives. But I don't know current state of process and may su

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #11 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 19:26:31 UTC --- (In reply to comment #10) > Thanks. > > diff --git a/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c b/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c > index e169276..71c02c4 100644 > --- a/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c > +++ b/gcc/sel-sched-ir.c > @@

[Bug rtl-optimization/46514] 128-bit shifts on x86_64 generate silly code unless the shift amount is constant

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46514 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/46525] [4.6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap-lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46525 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0

[Bug debug/39104] stabs debug info fails on IRIX 5.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39104 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/46518] internal compiler error: in vinsn_detach, at sel-sched-ir.c:1271

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46518 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 20:34:15 UTC --- I can also confirm that the patch in Comment 10 eliminates the ICE in compiling gfortran.dg/pr42294.f -O on x86_64-apple-darwin10 (bootstrapped with --enable-build-with-cxx) as well.

[Bug bootstrap/41337] [LTO] Parallel build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337 --- Comment #4 from Dima 2010-11-17 21:02:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > If you encounter parallel build failures, please post exact revision that was > built, configure command line, build system type, number of processors on the > box, N

[Bug middle-end/45505] [4.6 Regression] gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505 --- Comment #14 from Jack Howarth 2010-11-17 21:16:40 UTC --- Interestingly, on x86_64-apple-darwin10, when using a --enable-build-with-cxx bootstrap, these tests change to... XPASS: gfortran.dg/pr25923.f90 -O PR45505 (test for warnings, line

[Bug c++/46526] New: VTable Problem?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 Summary: VTable Problem? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org Repor

[Bug c/46076] [4.6 regression] constant propagation and compile-time math no longer happening versus 4.4 and 4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46076 --- Comment #11 from Matt Hargett 2010-11-17 21:37:43 UTC --- Given that "int foo()" and "int foo(void)" are not varargs functions, shouldn't GCC mainline be able to optimize this?

[Bug middle-end/46510] [4.6 Regression] r166812 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin10

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46510 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres 2010-11-17 21:39:08 UTC --- As I said in pr46511, removing the assert fixes the bootstrap and does not seem to introduce any regression (finishing regtesting): --- /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/varpool.c2010-11

[Bug middle-end/42371] dead code not eliminated during folding with whole-program

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42371 --- Comment #5 from Matt Hargett 2010-11-17 21:43:13 UTC --- GCC 4.6.0.20101116 still shows this problem, but also introduces new problems on top of it. Let me know if I should file a new bug for the regressions. Either way, is there any update o

  1   2   >