http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46391
--- Comment #3 from Roy Rosen 2010-11-11 08:03:57
UTC ---
It happens also on i386 with ./cc1 -O3 a.c -fdump-rtl-all -funroll-loops
-fsched-verbose=8 -fschedule-insns:
In asmcons:
(insn 16 15 17 4 a.c:5 (set (reg:SI 72 [ vect_var_.26 ])
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
08:09:56 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 08:09:46 2010
New Revision: 166595
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166595
Log:
PR debug/46150
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (ht
A candidate fix has been proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01129.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45383
--- Comment #4 from dodji at seketeli dot org
2010-11-11 08:24:20 UTC ---
A candidate fix has been proposed at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01129.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46150
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46413
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-11
09:16:08 UTC ---
Untested patch:
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (Revision 166596)
+++ resolve.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -7948,6 +7948,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46425
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-11
09:30:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I forgot to mention one thing. The code that seems to acting suspisciously is
> this bit:
>
> toDo.erase( *out ); //Putting this code here instead of th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3713
--- Comment #27 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-11
09:45:02 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Martin,
> is this solved now?
The last time I checked it wasn't, mainly because this is not really
an IPA problem (if it was, indirect inlining would handl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
--- Comment #8 from Mikael Pettersson 2010-11-11
10:04:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Any progress here?
The patch was posted and OK:d, but stalled apparently because I don't yet have
a copyright assignment on file. My new employer's (Ro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46408
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-11
10:09:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Apparently this happens inside the copying routine, but I'm not quite sure
> where exactly the problem is.
Well, that's simple. If one looks at the dump (fo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44769
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46414
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46418
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46412
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Jorn W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44767
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from Jorn W
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
--- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
10:39:35 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Hmm, I should read testcases curefully. It is memcmp. GCC is not really smart
> on inlining this; I guess we should just disable the inline unless we opti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46426
Summary: [avr] avr/libgcc.S in SVN r166596 fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31528
--- Comment #11 from Joerg Wunsch 2010-11-11
10:59:42 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Can you, please, test if current mainline behave more resonably?
Well, I had to fix bug #46426 first ...
Yes, that looks good now. Compiling the origina
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46053
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-11
11:02:44 UTC ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46287
--- Comment #2 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-11
11:03:10 UTC ---
Patch posted to the mailing list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44770
--- Comment #1 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-11 11:04:49 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 11 11:04:44 2010
New Revision: 166597
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166597
Log:
Use more specific PR number in ChangeLog
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44770
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39104
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|stabs debug info fails |stabs debug info fails on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46427
Summary: set-but-not-used warnings in m32r.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-11
11:27:27 UTC ---
> The insn that was matched looks like:
>
> (gdb) up
> #1 0x00b9da94 in recog_7 (x0=0x71f329d8, insn=0x71f296c0,
> pnum_clobbers=0x7fffdc9c)
> at ../../g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
11:29:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 22373
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22373
gcc46-pr46088.patch
Untested fix.
I went through ix86_binary_operator_ok:
/* Both source operand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46088
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
11:33:17 UTC ---
Guess a comment should be added there explaining it too, will add it once you
pick up which version do you prefer. Uros?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45491
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #21 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
11:43:48 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> It keeps failing on Solaris 2/SPARC (just confirmed on sparc-sun-solaris2.10)
> as of 20101104.
What's the failure mode on sparc?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43052
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-11
12:04:02 UTC ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Thu Nov 11 12:03:59 2010
New Revision: 166598
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166598
Log:
2010-11-11 Martin Jambor
PR tree-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46428
Summary: moxie-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46429
Summary: --enable-build-with-cxx fails on stddef.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46430
Summary: avr-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46431
Summary: fr30-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46432
Summary: v850-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|mjambor at su
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
--- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
12:28:42 UTC ---
More complete testcase:
--- file1.c
void baz(void) {}
void *y = (void *)baz;
int main () { return 0; }
--- file2.c
static void bar(void) __attribute__ ((weakref("baz")))
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46205
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus 2010-11-11
13:07:03 UTC ---
Untested patch:
Index: resolve.c
===
--- resolve.c (Revision 166598)
+++ resolve.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -9098,8 +9098,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46433
Summary: var-tracking.c doesn't include tm_p.h
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46434
Summary: crx-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46435
Summary: cris-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46436
Summary: m68hc11-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|rguenth at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46437
Summary: mcore-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46438
Summary: xtensa-elf --enable-werror-always build fails
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
--- Comment #17 from Dave Korn 2010-11-11 13:34:04
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Thu Nov 11 13:33:59 2010
New Revision: 166601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166601
Log:
PR bootstrap/46397
PR bootstrap/46362
* co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #18 from Dave Korn 2010-11-11 13:34:04
UTC ---
Author: davek
Date: Thu Nov 11 13:33:59 2010
New Revision: 166601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166601
Log:
PR bootstrap/46397
PR bootstrap/46362
* co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46397
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
Dave Korn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46362
--- Comment #20 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-11 13:56:56 UTC ---
> --- Comment #19 from Dave Korn 2010-11-11 13:38:04
> UTC ---
> Hi Rainer, I'm closing this bug despite not having heard back from you about
> your latest boots
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44150
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
14:05:29 UTC ---
Ah, I think it has gone latent by disabling frame-pointer by default on
i?86-linux and enabling (async) unwind tables. No unwind tables was
exactly the problem, on i?86-linux at l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 fro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45721
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-11 14:16:07 UTC
---
Hi,
handling of weaks and weakrefs is indeed deeply broken with LTO. I plan to
look into it after pushing more of the stuff
I don't want to get into mainline too late in stage3. That is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
14:22:23 UTC ---
The testcase is supposed to not ICE or hang, the diagnostics indeed come
and go, so it's fine to expect them again. See svn log which tells you
that martin removed them last time .
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989
Scott Mansell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phiren at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33989
Richard Guenther changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #13 from Richard Guenther
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-11 14:57:57 UTC
---
> --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2010-11-11
> 14:22:23 UTC ---
> The testcase is supposed to not ICE or hang, the diagnostics indeed come
> and go, so it's fine to expect them ag
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46439
Summary: Internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
Dodji Seketeli changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45088
--- Comment #6 from Dodji Seketeli 2010-11-11
15:43:17 UTC ---
I believe this is a smaller reproducer (the type of *a1 is not present
in debug info):
struct A
{
virtual ~A();
};
struct B : public A
{
virtual ~B(){}
};
struct C : public
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46269
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez 2010-11-11
15:46:10 UTC ---
I have submitted a fix here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01078.html
I have also submitted a fix for the additional ICE mentioned in the testcase
("XXX Commenting th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
15:48:43 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 15:48:39 2010
New Revision: 166603
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166603
Log:
PR middle-end/46388
* expr.c (expand_assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46375
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2010-11-11
15:56:09 UTC ---
This patchlet is sufficient but I wonder how it will fare...
Index: emit-rtl.c
===
--- emit-rtl.c (revision 166490)
++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41644
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46424
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely 2010-11-11
17:13:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
>
> Maybe I'm misinterpreting the standard, but in 23.2.1, it states:
>
> "The insert members shall not affect the validity of iterators and references
> t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46388
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
17:14:47 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46302
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46242
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
--- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-11 17:47:47
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Ok, the catch is that they seem to be target specific now. Is there way to
> say to ignore
> warning if it appears?
dg-prune-output perhaps?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46242
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor 2010-11-11
18:23:52 UTC ---
Actually, my patch for PR 46053 and PR 46287 fixes also this one:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-11/msg01140.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
--- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-11 18:42:53 UTC ---
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
>
> --- Comment #5 from Uros Bizjak 2010-11-11
> 17:47:47 UTC --
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de
2010-11-11 18:43:39 UTC ---
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2010, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
> >
> > --- Co
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44749
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke
2010-11-11 19:11:51 UTC ---
Author: amylaar
Date: Thu Nov 11 19:11:44 2010
New Revision: 166614
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166614
Log:
PR target/44749
* config
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
Summary: [4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: in rtl_verify_flow_info, at
cfgrtl.c:2165 with -fstack-protector-all
-fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44749
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46423
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46421
--- Comment #2 from Leo Izen 2010-11-11 20:11:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Invalid, you need the mingw32 headers installed.
How do I get these?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46107
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:33:21 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:33:18 2010
New Revision: 166615
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166615
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-03 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46165
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:35:13 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:35:10 2010
New Revision: 166616
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166616
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-03 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:36:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:36:49 2010
New Revision: 166617
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166617
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46099
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:38:15 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:38:12 2010
New Revision: 166618
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166618
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46160
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:39:33 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:39:25 2010
New Revision: 166619
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166619
Log:
2010-11-11 Jakub Jelinek
Backport from main
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44772
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:40:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:40:32 2010
New Revision: 166620
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166620
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-05 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45894
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek 2010-11-11
20:41:36 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 11 20:41:34 2010
New Revision: 166621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166621
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-11-09 Jakub Je
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46432
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #22 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2010-11-11 21:45:40 UTC ---
It dies with SIGBUS here:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)]
0x00012d24 in testE ()
at
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #23 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-11 21:48:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 22376
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22376
preprocessed input for 32-bit Solaris 10/SPARC, -Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45722
--- Comment #24 from Rainer Orth 2010-11-11 21:49:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 22377
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22377
assembler output for 32-bit Solaris 10/SPARC, -Os
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46325
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436
--- Comment #38 from Jan Hubicka 2010-11-11
22:08:31 UTC ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Thu Nov 11 22:08:26 2010
New Revision: 166624
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166624
Log:
PR tree-optimize/40436
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43690
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
