[Bug target/41302] Cast of return value from uint32 to pointer cannot be optimized by a jump to called rtn.

2009-09-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 22:14 --- This is almost certainly a bug in the m68k backend in that it doesn't check for the difference in return registers. Compare it's m68k_ok_for_sibcall_p function vs the i386 routine. -- rth at gcc dot gnu dot org chan

[Bug rtl-optimization/41299] code size regression (from 4.3) with -Os and -mregparm=3

2009-09-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 22:35 --- Register selection was slightly better in 4.3.5; mainline has a few extra move instructions. And for the record, "size test.o" avoids the need for the objcopy: textdata bss dec hex filename 66

[Bug ada/41325] New: ACATS c37105a wrong code on armv5tel

2009-09-09 Thread laurent at guerby dot net
On trunk rev 151524 (+ Mikael patch) there is only one ACATS fail ,.,. C37105A ACATS 2.5 09-09-09 18:49:01 C37105A RECORDS WITH ONLY DISCRIMINANTS. * C37105A DISCRIMINANT-ONLY RECORDS DON'T WORK. C37105A FAILED . -- Summary: ACATS c37105a wro

[Bug target/41210] ICE with vsx_movv2df

2009-09-09 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from meissner at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 22:57 --- Created an attachment (id=18557) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18557&action=view) Patch to require vector addresses for GPRs to be a single register -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Bug c/37866] "passing argument from incompatible pointer type" warning cannot be passed to -Werror=

2009-09-09 Thread rsc at swtch dot com
--- Comment #7 from rsc at swtch dot com 2009-09-09 23:30 --- There is a difference between warnings about things that might be wrong in your code and warnings about things that are definitely wrong. This is one of the latter, and it is a shame that it's not already an error by default.

[Bug c++/28293] ICE on invalid typedef

2009-09-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 23:32 --- Subject: Bug 28293 Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 9 23:31:47 2009 New Revision: 151580 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151580 Log: /cp 2009-09-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/28293 * d

[Bug c++/28293] ICE on invalid typedef

2009-09-09 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from paolo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 23:34 --- Subject: Bug 28293 Author: paolo Date: Wed Sep 9 23:33:38 2009 New Revision: 151581 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151581 Log: /cp 2009-09-09 Paolo Carlini PR c++/28293 * d

[Bug c++/28293] ICE on invalid typedef

2009-09-09 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #9 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-09-09 23:34 --- Fixed in mainline. -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/41326] New: Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/{coverage.o,gcov.o} on i386-unknown-freebsd

2009-09-09 Thread gerald at pfeifer dot com
gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/nabil-files/pfeifer/OBJ-0909-2216' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs

[Bug bootstrap/41326] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/{coverage.o,gcov.o} on i386-unknown-freebsd

2009-09-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 23:50 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 41324 *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug bootstrap/41324] [4.5 Regression] "make compare" failure

2009-09-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 23:50 --- *** Bug 41326 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug bootstrap/41324] [4.5 Regression] "make compare" failure

2009-09-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-09 23:52 --- Problem is also seen of i386-*-freebsd -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41324

[Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored

2009-09-09 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 01:08 --- Features, features, features, always features... :) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41298

[Bug bootstrap/41324] [4.5 Regression] "make compare" failure

2009-09-09 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-09-10 01:10 --- It was introduced between revision 151561 and revision 151575. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41324

[Bug fortran/41298] wrong-code: Default initializer C_NULL_PTR ignored

2009-09-09 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 02:43 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Thus the question is: Why is the last expr == NULL and not EXPR_VARIABLE of > > flavour FL_PARAMETER? > > gfc_match_rvalue replaces parameters with their values:

[Bug c++/41313] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation and execution test failures on *-apple-darwin*

2009-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-10 03:49 --- Created an attachment (id=18558) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18558&action=view) preprocessed source for g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation -g -fprofile-use -- http://gcc.

[Bug c++/41313] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation and execution test failures on *-apple-darwin*

2009-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #2 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-10 03:50 --- Created an attachment (id=18559) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18559&action=view) assembly file for g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation -g -fprofile-use -- http://gcc.gnu.or

[Bug c++/41313] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation and execution test failures on *-apple-darwin*

2009-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #3 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-10 03:51 --- Created an attachment (id=18560) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18560&action=view) gcda file for g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation -g -fprofile-use -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bu

[Bug c++/41313] g++.dg/tree-prof/partition1.C compilation and execution test failures on *-apple-darwin*

2009-09-09 Thread howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu
--- Comment #4 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu 2009-09-10 03:52 --- Attached files were generated under r151584 with the command... /sw/src/fink.build/gcc45-4.4.999-20090909/darwin_objdir/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../g++ -B/sw/src/fink.build/gcc45-4.4.999-20090909

[Bug c++/41304] Building error while compiling gcc 4.3.2

2009-09-09 Thread vijay dot x dot jain at jpmchase dot com
--- Comment #15 from vijay dot x dot jain at jpmchase dot com 2009-09-10 06:02 --- Please find attached stack trace of the segmentation fault GNU C (GCC) version 4.3.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.10) compiled by GNU C version 4.3.2 (20090604) (gccfss), GMP version 4.3.1, MPFR version

[Bug c++/41304] Building error while compiling gcc 4.3.2

2009-09-09 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-10 06:52 --- > As mentioned by you the precompiled version of GCC on solaris 10 that we are > using is not the official compiler. So how do i fullfill this prerequisite Try with Sun Studio or with the genuine GCC: http://ww

<    1   2