[Bug middle-end/41149] -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components

--- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 09:08 --- The patch in comment #2 was successfully bootstrapped and regtested. Ok for trunk? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41149

[Bug middle-end/41149] -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components

--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-25 09:13 --- Subject: Re: -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, janus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 09:08 --- > The patch i

[Bug middle-end/41149] -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components

--- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 09:35 --- Subject: Bug 41149 Author: janus Date: Tue Aug 25 09:35:41 2009 New Revision: 151075 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151075 Log: 2009-08-25 Janus Weil PR middle-end/41149 * t

[Bug middle-end/41149] -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components

--- Comment #6 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 09:38 --- Fixed with r151075. Closing. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/41156] [4.4/4.5 Regression] zlib segfault in inflate_table() compiled w/ -O -msse2 ftree-vectorize

--- Comment #1 from mahatma at eu dot by 2009-08-25 10:20 --- Fix: I got bug with -msse only, not -msse2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156

[Bug c++/41144] [4.5 Regression] ice for legal code with -O2 in get_alias_set

--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 10:35 --- /space/rguenther/trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.pt/spec26.C:11:36: internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types const X [] and const X []^M Please submit a full bug report,^M with preproc

[Bug libobjc/34315] libobjc warnings with Win64 target=x86_64-pc-mingw32

--- Comment #7 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 10:36 --- Ok I fixed at revision 151077 the issues about gthr-win32.h, the objective-c library warnings aren't fixed by this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34315

[Bug middle-end/41149] -fdump-tree-original and procedure pointer components

--- Comment #7 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 11:21 --- Please drop the patch in gcc-patches as well (just post it with a comment that you've committed it to fix this PR). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41149

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 11:55 --- I see a similar slowdown with the patch in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00361.html (see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2009-08/msg00377.html). I suspect it is related to pr41098, but I don't know how to sho

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #10 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:01 --- > I see a similar slowdown with the patch in ... I have again forgotten to say that I saw the slowdown without the -fwhole-file option. I have changed the summary to reflect that. -- dominiq at lps dot ens dot f

[Bug bootstrap/40950] Bootstrap fails with in-tree gmp and without system C++ compiler

--- Comment #9 from developer at sandoe-acoustics dot co dot uk 2009-08-25 12:06 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Use --enable-stage1-languages=c,c++ I believe that this bug also applies to powerpc-apple-darwin8 and i686-apple-darwin9. the suggested remedy also works. This was introduce

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 12:22 --- We clone quite a few functions with -fwhole-file but appearantly we fail to apply constant propagation for &CONST_DECL arguments which is a pity. In fact we seem to clone them without any change. -- rguenth at

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:30 --- >From comment #9, I think inlining is just exposing a latent missed optimization related to the way the middle end handle pow(). This is why I changed the summary. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de 2009-08-25 12:40 --- Subject: Re: Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90 On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote: > --- Comment #12 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:30 > ---

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #14 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 12:51 --- > I don't think the issue is pow expansion. What I do see from different means is that the number of calls to pow() increases from 63,907,869 to 1,953,139,629. Since pow() is not exactly cheap, I think this could

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:24 --- Why would this be ambiguous? A string literal has type "array of n const char" (see 2.13.4/1), so it should go with the array constructor. Do you disagree? W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What

[Bug c++/40997] Wrong address returned in covariant return

--- Comment #8 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:27 --- Already confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/41002] Redundant diagnostic when class member function's name overlaps with class field's name

--- Comment #7 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:29 --- I would think so. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/23055] overload resolution does not find templated function (zero -> pointer)

--- Comment #4 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:31 --- *** Bug 41104 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/41104] overload resolution does not find templated function (zero -> pointer) (2)

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:31 --- Yes, I think this is an exact duplicate. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23055 *** -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/41163] New: verify_gimple fails

Attached .i file throws -- $ gcc -c grep.i grep.i: In function ‘cmd_grep’: grep.i:9236:5: error: type mismatch in address expression struct option[] * struct option[41] * options.0 = &options; grep.i:9236:5: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed Please submit a full bug

[Bug c/41163] verify_gimple fails

--- Comment #1 from hideaki at sogetthis dot com 2009-08-25 13:36 --- Created an attachment (id=18422) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18422&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41163

[Bug c++/41131] [4.3 Regression] non-lvalue in unary `&' wrongly accepted

--- Comment #10 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:39 --- Was already confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/41127] [4.4/4.5 regression] unnamed bitfield declaration parser regression

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:43 --- This is an interesting one: enum EE {ee}; struct D { enum EE : 8; }; In C++98, this looks like an unnamed bit field as part of struct D, but with C++0x we apparent

[Bug c++/41135] Uninitialized variable usage warning broken

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:45 --- Agreed -- I do get the warning from current mainline as well. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/41153] ICE in building Qt4 src/core

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:46 --- Please follow the instructions listed in as mentioned by the error message. In particular, we need a preprocessed testcase. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Rem

[Bug c++/23257] Incorrect exception-handling behavior with references

--- Comment #6 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:58 --- Confirmed. Nathan, is this the bug you had worked on? If so, it may be of interest to add a link to your patch to this PR for reference. W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/23702] volatile const members of structures not treated as volatile

--- Comment #4 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:59 --- gcc 3.3 has not been maintained for a long time. Since you say that gcc 4.0 fixes the bug, I think we can close the bug. W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Adde

[Bug c++/41161] Hello World in C++ ISO does NOT compile

-- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41161

[Bug c++/40146] Unexplained "'' is used uninitialized in this function" warning

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 13:54 --- Hm, can you try to come up with a smaller testcase for which it may be a bit simpler to see what is going on? Thanks W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/16663] Poor parse error recovery with mispelled type in function declaration

--- Comment #6 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 13:53 --- *** Bug 41054 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/40901] Access qualifiers of embedded templates are discarded

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:04 --- Confirmed: - class A { template struct s { enum { value }; }; }; int i = A::s<10>::value; - This should produce an error but doesn't. W. -- ba

[Bug c++/41054] Cryptic error message when type is not defined.

--- Comment #2 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 13:53 --- I think this is a duplicate of PR 16663, just a different testcase. One can possibly construct a lot of different testcases for mispelled/undefined types, depending on the context where the declaration takes place (retu

[Bug c++/40892] maybe_warn_cpp0x i18n problems

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:10 --- Confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:13 --- With current mainline, I just get these errors: g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/x86/gcc-mainline/bin/c++ x.cc -std=c++0x x.cc:4:36: error: '__int128_t' was not declared in this scope x.cc:5:36: error: '__uint128_t' was not decla

[Bug c++/40821] C++ compiler accepts __attribute__ with missing parens

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:15 --- Confirmed. Very odd. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40808] [4.4/4.5 regression] member template specialization causes ICE

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:16 --- Confirmed. An ICE. I haven't checked the accepts-invalid part. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

--- Comment #3 from v dot haisman at sh dot cvut dot cz 2009-08-25 14:20 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Why would this be ambiguous? A string literal has type "array of n const char" > (see 2.13.4/1), so it should go with the array constructor. Do you disagree? > > W. > IANALL, but I

[Bug c++/40793] "Error: no matching function for call to XYZ" doesn't display function-template-arguments

--- Comment #5 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:25 --- Jonathan, the point everyone is trying to make is this: since no function or function template matches the call, all the compiler could possibly do is list all declarations of the name staticPrint() or none, but of cours

[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

--- Comment #17 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 14:27 --- Subject: Bug 41139 Author: janus Date: Tue Aug 25 14:26:44 2009 New Revision: 151081 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151081 Log: 2009-08-25 Janus Weil PR fortran/41139 * pri

[Bug fortran/41139] [4.5 Regression] a procedure pointer call as actual argument

--- Comment #18 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 14:29 --- Fixed with r151081. Closing. -- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/41164] New: Unable to find spill register

With this compiler: heine:~/programs/gambc-v4_5_1-devel> /pkgs/gcc-mainline/bin/gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../../mainline/configure --enable-checking=release --prefix=/pkgs/gcc-mainline --enable-languages=c,c++ -enable-stage1-languages=c,c++ Thre

[Bug fortran/41165] New: -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

Since PR 25104 and PR 29962, gfortran allows PRODUCT in initialization expressions (2009-06-07); however, using -std=f95 PRODUCT is still accepted. Expected: Print an error when using -std=f95. INTEGER, PARAMETER :: d = 4 ! Number of elements to permute INTEGER :: I INTEGER, PARAMETER :: maxnum =

[Bug c++/40685] explicit constructor is used where only implicit ctors are allowed

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 14:39 --- Hm, confusing: - enum E {e}; struct A { A(int); explicit A(E) {}; }; int main () { A a = e; } - This compiles but not links becase A::A(int) is called. If

[Bug c++/40942] GCC accepts code that Comeau and MSVC deems invalid.

--- Comment #4 from tom at kera dot name 2009-08-25 14:48 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Why would this be ambiguous? A string literal has type "array of n const char" > (see 2.13.4/1), so it should go with the array constructor. Do you disagree? > > W. > Table 9 under 13.3.3/1 shows

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-08-25 14:48 --- Subject: Re: undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128' On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, bangerth at gmail dot com wrote: > With current mainline, I just get these errors: > > g/x> /home/bangerth/bin/x86/gcc-mainline/bin

[Bug rtl-optimization/41164] Unable to find spill register

--- Comment #1 from lucier at math dot purdue dot edu 2009-08-25 14:57 --- Created an attachment (id=18423) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18423&action=view) test file that illustrates failure -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41164

[Bug testsuite/41166] New: [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

Revision 151015 gave ../src-trunk/contrib/test_summary | sh sh: -c: line 0: unexpected EOF while looking for matching `"' sh: -c: line 1: syntax error: unexpected end of file Revision 151012 is OK. -- Summary: [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted

[Bug c++/40664] Parse error declaring friend class using dependent template instance

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:24 --- Confirmed: - template struct Base { template class I {}; };

[Bug c++/40685] explicit constructor is used where only implicit ctors are allowed

--- Comment #3 from kretz at kde dot org 2009-08-25 15:26 --- Actually I came across this problem because my code was failing on MSVC and icc. Then I noticed that icc compiles the code, the one that I pasted, differently. On further investigation I decided that gcc is at fault and that m

[Bug c++/40855] undefined reference to `typeinfo for __int128'

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:26 --- Confirmed with gcc4.2.1. W. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirme

[Bug c++/40561] code does not compile -- compiles fine when replacing != with !(==)

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:30 --- Can you try to come up with a smaller, possibly self-contained testcase that would make it simpler for us to determine what's going on? Take a look here regarding what would help us: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html W. -

[Bug middle-end/40106] Time increase with inlining for the Polyhedron test air.f90

--- Comment #15 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-08-25 15:30 --- I think I have made some progress to understand the problem: (1) The 1,953,139,629 or so calls to pow() are the non optimized base. (2) For working situations this number is reduced to 63,907,869 or so when using t

[Bug c/41163] verify_gimple fails

--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 15:31 --- Reducing. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41163

[Bug c++/40535] [4.5 regression] Invalid conversion from 'T' to 'T' error when compiling C++ code

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:31 --- Confirmed. A regression. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40527] #pragma pack([push,] n) should be coded in the signature

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:33 --- That would require that the ABI specifies such a mangling. I'm not sure anyone wants to go that route. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40527

[Bug c++/40406] ICE with broken template member declaration

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:34 --- Confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40405] [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] ICE with invalid initialization of template member

--- Comment #2 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:35 --- Confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/40371] ICE with template operator

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:35 --- Confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/41163] [4.5 Regression] verify_gimple fails

--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 15:37 --- Confirmed. struct option { void *value; }; void parse_options (struct option *); void cmd_grep(void) { struct option options[] = { { &options } }; parse_options(options); } -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu

[Bug c++/40315] template instantiation fails when using const typename

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:39 --- Hm, interesting. I would have thought as well that the code should compile. On the other hand, icc also produces the same error message, so I am now officially confused... -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed:

[Bug c++/40292] ICE on legal code

--- Comment #3 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:40 --- Also works on gcc4.3.2, so apparently fixed everywhere. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/40261] confusing diagnostic on ill-formed template definition

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:42 --- Yes, this is confusing. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c/41163] [4.5 Regression] verify_gimple fails

-- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org

[Bug c++/40239] Aggregate initialization requires copy constructor

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:44 --- Confirmed. Not a regression. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/40535] [4.5 regression] Invalid conversion from 'T' to 'T' error when compiling C++ code

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40535

[Bug ada/40775] [4.4/4.5 Regression] Ada on ARM ICE in find_valid_class, at reload.c:701

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40775

[Bug c++/40808] [4.4/4.5 regression] member template specialization causes ICE

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40808

[Bug bootstrap/40968] [4.5 Regression] ICE when compiling O2g.gch; problem with --enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40968

[Bug c++/41038] [4.4/4.5 regression] Parsing error related to qualified name id

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41038

[Bug middle-end/41082] [4.5 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/where_2.f90 execution, -O3 -g with -m64

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41082

[Bug rtl-optimization/41085] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gcc.dg/pr28796-2.c

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41085

[Bug tree-optimization/41087] [4.5 Regression]: cris-elf gfortran.dg/zero_sized_3.f90 -O3 -funroll-loops execution

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41087

[Bug c++/40224] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] g++ Accepting invalid code

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:49 --- Confirmed. -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/41089] [4.5 Regression] r147980 (New SRA) breaks stdargs

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41089

[Bug ada/41100] [4.4 regression] Unchecked_Deallocation causes double-free errors

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41100

[Bug c++/41109] [4.5 regression] Argument flagged as unused despite use in sizeof()

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41109

[Bug c++/41127] [4.4/4.5 regression] unnamed bitfield declaration parser regression

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41127

[Bug fortran/41152] [4.5 Regression] Spurious diagnostic "Extraneous characters in format"

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41152

[Bug driver/40200] ''gcc file.cpp -o file.cpp'' overwrites input file

--- Comment #1 from bangerth at gmail dot com 2009-08-25 15:51 --- Confirmed. This is indeed awkward, and not actually all that hard to get into using makefiles (was @< the input or output file again??). -- bangerth at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/40224] [4.3/4.4/4.5 regression] g++ Accepting invalid code

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.5 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40224

[Bug target/41156] [4.4/4.5 Regression] zlib segfault in inflate_table() compiled w/ -O -msse2 ftree-vectorize

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41156

[Bug fortran/41162] [4.5 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 failed to build

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41162

[Bug testsuite/41166] [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

-- jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41166

[Bug testsuite/41166] [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

--- Comment #1 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 15:57 --- AFACIS, the bug is in the test_summary script, it tries to "parse" the internals of a config.status file. To extract values from config.status portably (across both systems and Autoconf versions), use either an AC_CON

[Bug fortran/41167] New: ICE with PACK() and string concatenation

Hi, the following code leads to an ICE: % cat gfcbug88.f90 program gfcbug88 implicit none type t character(len=8) :: name end type t type(t) ,parameter :: obstyp(2)= (/ t ('A'), t ('B') /) print *, pack (" "//obstyp(:)% name, (/ .true., .false. /)) ! ICE !print *, pack (obstyp(:

[Bug testsuite/41166] [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-08-25 16:23 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > AFACIS, the bug is in the test_summary script, it tries to "parse" the > internals

[Bug testsuite/41166] [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

--- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 16:32 --- (In reply to comment #2) > > value_of_substed=`echo @substed@ | ./config.status --file=-` > > It's a bad idea for the script to depend at all on either config.status or > a build tree I don't understand this remar

[Bug testsuite/41166] [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2009-08-25 16:58 --- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string On Tue, 25 Aug 2009, rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Comment #3 from rwild at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 16:32 --- > (

[Bug fortran/41167] ICE with PACK() and string concatenation

--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:02 --- > internal compiler error: in gfc_typenode_for_spec That's the unreachable() due to: spec->type == BT_UNKNOWN. Debugging shows that gfc_typenode_for_spec is called by gfc_conv_expr_descriptor where erxp->expr_type

[Bug libfortran/34670] bounds checking for array intrinsics

--- Comment #15 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:05 --- Subject: Bug 34670 Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Aug 25 17:05:10 2009 New Revision: 151085 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151085 Log: 2009-08-25 Thomas Koenig PR libfortran/34670

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:09 --- Without checking, I'd expect it's not only PRODUCT, but all of the intrinsics allowed in init-expr by F2003. Offhand I'd blame expr.c (check_transformational), in particular: 2151 functions = (gfc_option.allow_std

[Bug fortran/41165] -std=f95: Reject PRODUCT in initialization expressions.

--- Comment #2 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 17:37 --- It turns out, that the PRODUCT is already simplified to EXPR_CONST before is is checked in expr.c (check_init_expr). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41165

[Bug fortran/40869] [F03] PPC assignment checking

-- janus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |janus at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug fortran/41168] New: incorrect processing of formatted records in mingw port

The following bug occurs only in the version of gfortran downloaded from ftp://ftp.equation.com/gcc/gcc-4.5-20090820-32.exe. When I compile and run the program listed below it prints: 1234567890 1234567890 end of file not detected On every other port of gfortran it prints: 1234567890 end o

[Bug fortran/41167] ICE with PACK() and string concatenation

--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 18:32 --- In principle, the correct type is (should be) set in resolve_operator: case INTRINSIC_CONCAT: if (op1->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && op2->ts.type == BT_CHARACTER && op1->ts.kind == op2->ts.kind)

[Bug fortran/41062] [4.4 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438

--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 18:55 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.4. Thanks for the report. Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/34412] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:1990

--- Comment #8 from aesok at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 19:04 --- Subject: Bug 34412 Author: aesok Date: Tue Aug 25 19:03:53 2009 New Revision: 151094 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151094 Log: PR target/34412 * config/avr/avr.c (expand_epilog

[Bug fortran/41062] [4.4 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_use_stmts, at fortran/trans-decl.c:3438

--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-25 18:55 --- Subject: Bug 41062 Author: pault Date: Tue Aug 25 18:54:58 2009 New Revision: 151092 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=151092 Log: 2008-08-25 Paul Thomas PR fortran/41062 * tra

[Bug libfortran/41169] New: [4.5 regression] libgfortran fails to build on Solaris 10+: '_Imaginary_I' undeclared

Probably since the introduction of those two patches 2009-07-27 Tobias Burnus PR fortran/40863 * c99_functions.c: Define complex I, if not defined. Create prototypes for C99 functions to silence warnings. * gfortran.map: Add missing functions to GFORTRAN_C99_1.0

  1   2   >