[Bug target/40648] misaligned store vectorizer patch introduced 10% runtime regression on Polyhedron test_fpu

2009-07-05 Thread eres at il dot ibm dot com
--- Comment #7 from eres at il dot ibm dot com 2009-07-05 08:12 --- Testing test_fpu on Power7 with the power7 branch shows no significant difference between the version compiled with the misaligned store support patch and without it. (using -mcpu=power7 -ffast-math -funroll-loops -O3) T

[Bug fortran/39489] [4.3 regression] write_atom(): Writing negative integer

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:07 --- Works with newer branches (4.4 and 4.5). According to gfortran maintainers meeting, will not be fixed. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/40632] Support F2008's contiguous attribute

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||39627 nThis|| S

[Bug fortran/40643] maxloc/minloc: Wrong result for NaN at position 1

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last recon

[Bug fortran/40628] Assignment using "= trim(string)": Optimize "trim" away

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last recon

[Bug fortran/40588] Small bug in match_charkind_name

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build t

[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||39627 nThis||

[Bug fortran/40571] F2008: ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: Missing constants

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||39627 nThis||

[Bug fortran/40571] F2008: ISO_FORTRAN_ENV: Missing constants

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40571

[Bug fortran/40569] F2008: Support COMPILER_OPTIONS() / COMPILER_VERSION()

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40569

[Bug fortran/40568] F2008: C_SIZEOF is in the wrong scope

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Ke

[Bug libfortran/40549] MinGW Fortran patches for libgfortran/Makefile.{in,am}

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:21 --- I'll take it. My own Windows machine is currently down (broken disk), but I'll test the patch when I can. -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug libfortran/22423] Warnings when building libgfortran

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:23 --- *** Bug 40545 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/40545] compile warnings in libgfortran

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:23 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 22423 *** -- fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libfortran/22423] Warnings when building libgfortran

2009-07-05 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 09:24 --- Additional new warning: intrinsics/iso_c_binding.c: In Function "__iso_c_binding_c_f_pointer_u0": libgfortran/intrinsics/iso_c_binding.c:112:20: Warning: "ub" may be used uninitialized in this function -- fx

[Bug c/40635] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

2009-07-05 Thread antonio dot weber at stud dot fh-regensburg dot de
--- Comment #1 from antonio dot weber at stud dot fh-regensburg dot de 2009-07-05 10:29 --- I only wanted to confirm this report. The same behaviour with gcc 4.3.2 and a build from yesterdays svn %> gcc -O2 -Wall -c ~/test.c ~/test.c: In function »server_init«: ~/test.c:38: warning: 's

[Bug libfortran/40330] [4.5 Regression] incorrect IO

2009-07-05 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #33 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 12:25 --- Created an attachment (id=18138) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18138&action=view) Patch ready for testing Joost, if you can, please test this patch on all of CP2K. Other testors welcome.

[Bug libstdc++/40654] New: atomic.cc: 'd' is used uninitialized warning

2009-07-05 Thread sezeroz at gmail dot com
During compilation of libstdc++ for i686-pc-mingw32, I noticed this warning: ../../../../gcc44-svn/libstdc++-v3/src/atomic.cc:83: warning: 'd' is used uninitialized in this function ../../../../gcc44-svn/libstdc++-v3/src/atomic.cc:83: note: 'd' was declared here Notice the 'is used' and not 'mayb

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

2009-07-05 Thread christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
--- Comment #18 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2009-07-05 17:24 --- As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, this is fixed, -- christian dot joensson at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libstdc++/40654] atomic.cc: 'd' is used uninitialized warning

2009-07-05 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2009-07-05 18:08 --- Benjamin, can you have a look? To me, it seems a back-end issue in the compiler, because I don't see anything wrong in the code... -- paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Remove

[Bug fortran/40551] Wrong code due to missing copy-in/copy-out stried array to assumed-size dummy

2009-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 19:06 --- Subject: Bug 40551 Author: pault Date: Sun Jul 5 19:06:05 2009 New Revision: 149261 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149261 Log: 2009-07-05 Paul Thomas PR fortran/40551 * de

[Bug fortran/40646] ICE assigning array return value from type-bound procedure

2009-07-05 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 19:14 --- Subject: Bug 40646 Author: pault Date: Sun Jul 5 19:13:59 2009 New Revision: 149262 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149262 Log: 2009-07-05 Paul Thomas and Tobias Burnus PR

[Bug c++/40655] New: The copy constructor is not needed but GCC (C++) don't let me to initialize my object instance!

2009-07-05 Thread MSHojatoleslami at Gmail dot com
Sorry for my long summary text! Please, look at the following C++ code: //-- start of the code class A { public : A (int i) { } private: A (const A& a) { } }; int main (int argc, char* argv[]) { // ERROR: How could i use the auto keyword which exist in GCC 4.4 auto a1 = A

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

2009-07-05 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #19 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-07-05 23:44 --- (In reply to comment #18) > As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, > this > is fixed, > I tried it yesterday, after updating with SVN and updating my 1.7 cygwin, and got the same

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

2009-07-05 Thread dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #20 from dave dot korn dot cygwin at gmail dot com 2009-07-05 23:47 --- (In reply to comment #19) > (In reply to comment #18) > > As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, > > this > > is fixed, > > > > I tried it yesterday, after updating

[Bug tree-optimization/40642] [4.5 regression] ICE with -fprofile-generate

2009-07-05 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-05 23:59 --- Confirmed. Reduced testcase (crashes with "-O2 -fprofile-generate"): inline void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__, void* p) throw() { return p; }

[Bug c++/40557] [4.5 Regression] ICE with template union

2009-07-05 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 04:55 --- Subject: Bug 40557 Author: simartin Date: Mon Jul 6 04:55:20 2009 New Revision: 149276 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=149276 Log: gcc/cp/ 2009-07-06 Simon Martin PR c++/40557

[Bug c++/40557] [4.5 Regression] ICE with template union

2009-07-05 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-06 05:05 --- Fixed in 4.5 -- simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|

[Bug c/40656] New: Can't initial the fields of unamed struct/union.

2009-07-05 Thread xiaosuo at gmail dot com
xiao...@gentux test $ cat unamed.c struct test { struct { int a; }; }; int main() { struct test t1; t1.a = 0; /* it is OK */ struct test t2 = {.a = 0}; /* error */ return 0; } xiao...@gentux test $ gcc unamed.c unamed.c: In function