[Bug libfortran/38772] r143102 breaks xplor-nih

2009-01-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 03:32 --- I have reviewed our library code to see if we are handling BLANK=status correctly. AFAICT we are doing this right. I was concerned with your report because I thought maybe we were getting a side effect from the p

[Bug libfortran/38772] r143102 breaks xplor-nih

2009-01-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 04:03 --- g77, ifort, and gfortran 4.4 all pass this test case which should print nothing. c { dg-do run } c PR38097 I/O with blanks in exponent fails; BN edit descriptor c Test case derived from reporter.

[Bug libstdc++/38741] Unable to write data to wofstream

2009-01-08 Thread radhika dot ganganna at oracle dot com
--- Comment #7 from radhika dot ganganna at oracle dot com 2009-01-09 04:44 --- Hi Paolo, The expected result is the string "Forecast" should be output 100 times to wofstream. But it's ouput only 25 times. Regards, Radhika -- radhika dot ganganna at oracle dot com changed:

[Bug libfortran/37754] [4.4 Regression] READ I/O Performance regression from 4.3 to 4.4

2009-01-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-09 05:34 --- With Janne's patch and some minor tweaks. countlines.f gfortran 4.4 patched: 2.2 seconds gfortran 4.3: 3.5 seconds g77 : 2.7 seconds ifort : 1.1 seconds -- http

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-08 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #22 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-09 05:38 --- (In reply to comment #21) > Thanks for testing. Can you close the bug after the CP2K testsuite passes? unfortunately, there is still one runtime segfault, I have no reduced testcase so far, but this is the backtrace:

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-08 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #23 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-09 06:16 --- Created an attachment (id=17062) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17062&action=view) additional cp2k input With this CP2K testcase the segfault can be reproduced. After building cp2k, just run: cp2k

[Bug middle-end/38431] [graphite] several ICEs with CP2K (summary)

2009-01-08 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #24 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2009-01-09 06:18 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > __mc_moves_MOD_change_bond_length () at > /scratch/vondele/clean/cp2k/src/../src/mc_moves.F:1434 > 1434 atom_b(:)=0 > additio

[Bug middle-end/38666] [4.3 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in record_one_conflict, ra-conflict.c:176

2009-01-08 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
--- Comment #19 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2009-01-09 07:20 --- (In reply to comment #18) > So, only the ICE is a regression, not the memory-hog, correct? Yes. -- ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added ---

<    1   2