I get the following ICE with trunk from 20080903 (revision 127646). This
doesn't happen with 4.4.0 20080802
(sid)[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /usr/lib/gcc-snapshot/bin/gcc -O2 -c wmtv-wmtv.c
wmtv-wmtv.c: In function 'DoFullScreen':
wmtv-wmtv.c:97: internal compiler error: in ia64_speculate_insn, at
confi
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 08:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=16228)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16228&action=view)
Preprocessed code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37381
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 08:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=16229)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16229&action=view)
Slightly reduced testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37381
With current trunk (20080905, revision 127646):
(sid)973:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..4.3-2008-09-05-r140029/gcc] ./cc1 -quiet -O3
~/hamlib-hamlibtcl_wrap.i
hamlibtcl_wrap.c: In function 'T.4796':
hamlibtcl_wrap.c:1186: error: unrecognizable insn:
(insn 146 18 20 2 hamlibtcl_wrap.c:604 (set (
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||abel at ispras dot ru
Target Milestone|---
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 09:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=16230)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16230&action=view)
Preprocessed code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37382
--- Comment #2 from tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 09:11 ---
Confirmed.
--
tbm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Comment #11 from abel at ispras dot ru 2008-09-05 09:16 ---
I was unable to trigger the assert on the given testcase even with the
cross-compiler configured exactly like the one in the bug report. However, I
was able to reproduce the ICE on a longer plain C test case.
The assert
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 09:34 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37382
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 09:37
---
I think it's reasonable to disable the assert with a comment for now and
file a separate bugreport for the targets who lie about their issue rate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37360
--- Comment #5 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 10:23
---
this seems pretty easy to fix with decltype and variadic templates, patch
coming soon ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37351
--- Comment #6 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 10:29
---
Great. I'm assigning it to yourself, then.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from abel at ispras dot ru 2008-09-05 10:32 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> I think it's reasonable to disable the assert with a comment for now and
> file a separate bugreport for the targets who lie about their issue rate.
Ok, with the below patch my failing test case
--- Comment #14 from abel at ispras dot ru 2008-09-05 10:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=16231)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16231&action=view)
Proposed patch
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37360
--- Comment #7 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 11:57 ---
Subject: Bug 36746
Author: domob
Date: Fri Sep 5 11:56:23 2008
New Revision: 140034
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140034
Log:
2008-09-05 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #8 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 11:58 ---
Fixed on trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSI
--- Comment #6 from jh at suse dot cz 2008-09-05 12:39 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Divide_X
> All failures have
>
> -2147483648
> -2147483648
> 0
> 0
> 0
> java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
> java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
I've caused bug in expand_divmod that
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |domob at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #6 from fabien dot chene at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:22
---
There is a patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg00474.html
--
fabien dot chene at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:46 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> > I tried revision 140023 on RHEL4U6. I can bootstrap
> > with --enable-languages=c i586-linux.
>
> Which branch? I still get the failure on mainline at revision 140025.
>
See
http://
Compiler crashed with these lines
g++ main.cpp expenditure_category.h expenditure_category.cpp -O4
expenditure_category.h: In member function bool
expenditure::category_compare::operator()(const expenditure::category&, const
expenditure::category&) const:
expenditure_category.h:33: error: paren
--- Comment #1 from dckorah at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=16232)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16232&action=view)
the temporary file /tmp/ccZFb4sl.out
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37383
--- Comment #2 from dckorah at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:50 ---
Here is the output without the optimization options
g++ main.cpp expenditure_category.h expenditure_category.cpp
expenditure_category.h: In member function bool
expenditure::category_compare::operator()(const expenditure
--- Comment #7 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 13:51 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Divide_X
>
> > All failures have
> >
> > -2147483648
> > -2147483648
> > 0
> > 0
> > 0
> > java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero
> > java.lang.Arithmetic
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 14:00
---
Target? x86_64-linux?
I can't reproduce the problem on FSF 4.1.3, neither with 4.2.5, 4.3.2 or
mainline. I suspect it's a Debian modification at fault, not to be reported
here...
PS: -OX, with X >= 3 are all
--- Comment #4 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 14:02
---
Figured out from the attachment...
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
When building version 0.9.0 or 0.9.1 of the videolan client application with
gcc-4.3.2 or the 20080904 snapshot of version 4.3 I get the following error:
gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I../include -I../include -DSYS_LINUX
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D__USE_UNIX98 -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_REE
--- Comment #1 from chris2553 at googlemail dot com 2008-09-05 14:54
---
Created an attachment (id=16233)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16233&action=view)
Preprocessed file that triggers the problem
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 15:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16234)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16234&action=view)
Preprocessed code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37385
With current trunk (r140029):
(sid)985:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..4.3-2008-09-05-r140029/gcc] ./cc1 -quiet -O3
~/libsdl-erlang-esdl_wrapper.i
esdl_wrapper.c: In function 'init_fps':
esdl_wrapper.c:77: internal compiler error: in set_mem_alias_set, at
emit-rtl.c:1789
Please submit a full bug report,
with
--- Comment #1 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 15:45 ---
This may be the same issue (or one of the two issues) of PR 36296. Although I
would need to check the dumps before and after VRP.
Wuninitialized got some fixes in GCC 4.4, so we also need to test whether this
has been
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 16:19 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> During SCoP detection we split bbs (e.g. in "scopdet_edge_info"), but the SCoP
> detection should only detect SCoPs and not modify anything.
No, we want to split BBs to increase the scop boun
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 16:26 ---
/* Testcase by Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */
typedef struct sdl_data_def
{
}
sdl_data;
typedef void (*sdl_fun) (struct sdl_data_def *);
void undefined_function (sdl_data * sd)
{
}
void init_fps (sdl_fun *fun_tab)
{
--- Comment #7 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 17:05 ---
Subject: Bug 37342
Author: dgregor
Date: Fri Sep 5 17:04:12 2008
New Revision: 140037
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140037
Log:
2008-09-05 Douglas Gregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c+
--- Comment #8 from dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 17:06 ---
Fixed on mainline
--
dgregor at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #7 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 17:15 ---
Subject: Bug 37283
Author: janis
Date: Fri Sep 5 17:13:52 2008
New Revision: 140040
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140040
Log:
PR target/37283
* opts.c (decode_options): Handle
Trying to compile this code:
#define U0THR (*((volatile unsigned char *) 0xE000C000))
template
class Queue
{
public:
/**
Constructor, create a new queue.
*/
Queue()
{
put_pos=get_pos=num_elem=0;
}
bool IRQg
--- Comment #15 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 18:29 ---
Thanks for the patch.
With the patch applied to the trunk my bootstrap has made it into stage 2,
indicating that it has corrected the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37360
--- Comment #1 from fede dot tft at hotmail dot it 2008-09-05 18:40 ---
After searching the bug database, it looks like this bug is similar to bug
#27859 and bug #16634, but in this case occurs only with -Os
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37386
--- Comment #2 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:43 ---
This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
--- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:44 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.
>
Ooops. Please ignore this comments.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37384
--- Comment #8 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 19:44 ---
his regression was introduced between revisions 139822 and 139853.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378
With current trunk (r140043) on powerpc (but not on x86_64):
(sid)2492:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ..4.3-2008-09-05-r140043/gcc] ./cc1 -quiet -O2
~/gap-costab.i
../../src/costab.c: In function 'FuncStandardizeTable2C':
../../src/costab.c:2780: internal compiler error: in
extract_range_from_binary_expr, at
--- Comment #1 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 20:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=16235)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16235&action=view)
Preprocessed code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37387
--- Comment #2 from tbm at cyrius dot com 2008-09-05 20:25 ---
/* Testcase by Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> */
typedef long int Int;
typedef Int **Bag;
FuncMakeConsequencesPres (Bag self, Bag list)
{
Bag objDefs1;
Bag objDefs2;
if (! ( (((Int) 0) + 13) <=
(((Int) (
--- Comment #1 from g0dsowncountry at yahoo dot com 2008-09-05 20:46
---
Noticed that if GCC is configured with additional parameters
'--with-arch=5kc --with-tune=5kc', PASS 1 build completes (gcc version 4.4.0
20080904 (experimental)).
mipsisa64-linux-* builds fine w/o these extra c
--- Comment #2 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 20:53 ---
Subject: Bug 35837
Author: domob
Date: Fri Sep 5 20:51:50 2008
New Revision: 140046
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=140046
Log:
2008-09-05 Daniel Kraft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #3 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 20:55 ---
Fixed for trunk.
--
domob at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASS
GCC does not fail at -O0 when -fgraphite is used and support for
graphite is not built in the compiler.
--
Summary: [graphite] No warn with "-O0 -fgraphite" when cloog or
ppl are not present
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCO
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 21:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=16236)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16236&action=view)
fix
This patch fixes the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37388
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 21:25 ---
Confirmed, on PowerPC, you need -maltivec.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 21:43 ---
Revision 139832 is bad.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378
seen with 4.2.4, 4.3.2 and trunk 20080904
g++ -c -mtune=generic -g foo.ii
In file included from utNativePackedCoDec.cc:5:
../../src/pers/RecBuf.hh: At global scope:
../../src/pers/RecBuf.hh: In instantiation of
'pers::RecBuf':
utNativePackedCoDec.cc:11: instantiated from here
../../src/pers/Rec
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-05 22:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=16237)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16237&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37389
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:37 ---
Confirmed reduced testcase:
enum { OFFSET_MAX = (9223372036854775807L * 2UL + 1UL) };
enum {
OFFSET_MAX = OFFSET_MAX,
STRING_SZ = CoDec::Type::FIXED_SIZE,
STRING_DYN = CoDec::Type::DYN_PARTS,
--
pinskia at
this is the example from
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-08/msg00376.html
seen with 4.2.4 and 4.3.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/junk/prog/tju# gcc bug_short.c -lm -O2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/junk/prog/tju# ./a.out
2383,1
31727,1
132265613,1
3145439247023686464
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/junk/prog/tju# gc
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-05 22:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16238)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16238&action=view)
example
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37390
--- Comment #1 from spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16239)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16239&action=view)
fix
the attached patch fixes PR37375 by changing instantiate_scev to take
a basic block above which all the defini
--- Comment #10 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-05 22:53
---
Revision 139827 is bad.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37378
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:54 ---
I think this is really PR 323. Using -ffloat-store gives the correct answer.
D.2639 = pow ((double) a, (double) b + 1.0e+0);
num = (ull) D.2639 - 1.0e+0;
So I don't know what else to say, except -ffloat-store o
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:56 ---
Most likely fixed for 4.4 with
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg01461.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37329
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-05 22:59 ---
>which can cause problems in code that is otherwise valid.
No they are not valid. printf is allowed to be a macro function in both C90
and C99.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Re
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
all the examples referenced by
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/ext/pb_ds/assoc_examples.html
are not accessible.
--
Summary: examples not accessible online (non existing URLs)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
--- Comment #1 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 23:51
---
Benjamin, can you have a look to these links? Thanks.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-09-05 23:53
---
I think this is a major loss of function, we want to fix this before 4.4.0.
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 00:32 ---
can't reproduce this either with the Debian or Ubuntu gcc builds
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37383
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 01:23 ---
This problem was introduced in revision 137326. Removing the PARALLEL
breaks argument passing on this target. See the comment in pa.c,
function_arg, regarding argument justification on a big-endian target.
--
d
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 01:23 ---
Reducing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37337
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2008-09-06
01:43 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] Small structs are not passed correctly on
hppa64-*-*
> This problem was introduced in revision 137326. Removing the PARALLEL
> breaks argument passing on this target. See th
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 02:13 ---
Reduced testcase:
extern "C" {
typedef struct _IO_FILE FILE;
extern int __fprintf_chk (FILE *__restrict __stream, int __flag, __const
char *__restrict __format, ...);
extern __inline __attribute__ ((__alwa
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:08
---
Fixed on trunk. Thanks Daniel for the commit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:10
---
Fixed on trunk. Thanks Daniel for the commit.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-09-06 03:13
---
Un-assigning myself for the reason stated in comment #5
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-09-06 06:14
---
Revision 139826 is good. Revision 139827 is the cause.
--
hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
77 matches
Mail list logo
