[Bug fortran/36761] New: Unallocated array "referenced" silently

2008-07-08 Thread terry at chem dot gu dot se
I'm really not sure whether to consider this a bug or a "feature". It certainly *seems* to me that it's non-conforming code that compiles and runs happily. [EMAIL PROTECTED] BadStuff]$ cat alloc.f90 module aa implicit none real(kind=8),dimension(:,:),allocatable::Md end module aa program fred u

[Bug libgcj/36762] New: outstanding issues from the classpath-0.97 merge

2008-07-08 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
Matthias> * gcj/javaprims.h: Define jobjectRefType. AFAIK, there is no reason for jobjectRefType not to simply always be defined in Classpath's jni.h. Assuming I'm not missing something, I'd rather we do that. I'll send a patch there. Matthias> * jni.cc (_Jv_JNI_GetObjectRefType

[Bug libgcj/36763] New: new methods introduced with classpath-0.97.2, nyi in libgcj

2008-07-08 Thread doko at ubuntu dot com
the following methods are provided in classpath/vm/reference, but not yet implemented in libgcj (taken from svn diff -c137223 classpath/vm/reference): classpath/vm/reference/java/lang/VMFloat.java (floatToIntBits), classpath/vm/reference/java/lang/VMFloat.java (doubleToLongBits): methods removed.

[Bug fortran/36761] Unallocated array "referenced" silently

2008-07-08 Thread dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dfranke at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 09:03 --- Very similar to PR20520. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36761

[Bug c++/36760] Simple std::bind use causes warnings with -Wextra

2008-07-08 Thread paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2008-07-08 09:59 --- Thanks Tom. In fact, yesterday I was writing without remembering my past analyses of this type of issue, with system header warnings not suppressed: TREE_NO_WARNING is *not* generically uses for that. Everythin

[Bug middle-end/35492] ICE building kernel sk_stream_wait_connect output_operand: invalid operand for 'p' modifier

2008-07-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 10:08 --- Created an attachment (id=15874) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15874&action=view) patch for 4.3 While I investigate just a little more, here's the regtested patch I'll commit to the 4.3 branch. It's

[Bug middle-end/35492] ICE building kernel sk_stream_wait_connect output_operand: invalid operand for 'p' modifier

2008-07-08 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 10:26 --- Created an attachment (id=15875) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15875&action=view) patch for trunk/4.4 This is one part of a correction (regtested on trunk for cris-elf). By itself, it hides the bug

[Bug middle-end/36753] [4.3/4.4 Regression] Forward propagation interacts badly with global register variable

2008-07-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 13:23 --- Confirmed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug ada/36764] New: ICE with -gnatn inlining and stream attributes

2008-07-08 Thread baldrick at gcc dot gnu dot org
$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc.fsf.master/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gnat-fsf --enable-languages=ada,c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --disable-multilib --enable-checking Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20080630 (experimental) (GCC) $ gcc -

[Bug fortran/36689] PRINT and WRITE eat minus sign

2008-07-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 15:50 --- I have remote access to the machine now. Having trouble with gcc build. Not forgotton. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36689

[Bug fortran/36582] Namelist I/O error: Bogus "Cannot match namelist object"

2008-07-08 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 15:52 --- So far this is a tricky one. Probably turn out to be a one liner or a re-write. :) Status is I am on travel, but still working it. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36582

[Bug middle-end/35287] Missing PRE for indirect load

2008-07-08 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 16:11 --- Subject: Bug 35287 Author: dberlin Date: Tue Jul 8 16:11:06 2008 New Revision: 137631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137631 Log: 2008-07-05 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix P

[Bug middle-end/35286] Missing PRE for globals

2008-07-08 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 16:11 --- Subject: Bug 35286 Author: dberlin Date: Tue Jul 8 16:11:06 2008 New Revision: 137631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137631 Log: 2008-07-05 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix P

[Bug tree-optimization/23455] tree load PRE is not working for global variables

2008-07-08 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 16:11 --- Subject: Bug 23455 Author: dberlin Date: Tue Jul 8 16:11:06 2008 New Revision: 137631 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137631 Log: 2008-07-05 Daniel Berlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fix

[Bug c++/36760] Simple std::bind use causes warnings with -Wextra

2008-07-08 Thread mark at codesourcery dot com
--- Comment #6 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-07-08 16:32 --- Subject: Re: Simple std::bind use causes warnings with -Wextra paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > Thanks Tom. In fact, yesterday I was writing without remembering my past > analyses of this type of issue,

[Bug fortran/36689] PRINT and WRITE eat minus sign

2008-07-08 Thread dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com
--- Comment #9 from dennis dot wassel at googlemail dot com 2008-07-08 17:10 --- (In reply to comment #8) > I have remote access to the machine now. Having trouble with gcc build. Not > forgotton. I remember our admin talking about needing an updated ld to be able to compile gcc. Are

[Bug tree-optimization/36765] New: [4.4 Regression] Revision 137573 miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006

2008-07-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
Revision 137573 miscompiles 464.h264ref in SPEC CPU 2006 on Linux/x86-64 with -O2 -ffast-math: Running Benchmarks Running 464.h264ref test base o2 default Error with '/export/gnu/import/rrs/spec/2006/spec/bin/specinvoke -E -d /export/gnu/import/rrs/spec/2006/spec/benchspec/CPU2006/464.h264ref/r

[Bug fortran/36759] C_LOC and characters greater then one in length.

2008-07-08 Thread brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org
--- Comment #2 from brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org 2008-07-08 17:43 --- Subject: Re: C_LOC and characters greater then one in length. My mistake, I did not see that in the standard. It still would be nice however to have the non-standard feature for characters of LEN > 1. burnus at gc

[Bug c++/13699] Extern "C" routine in different namespaces accepted with different exception signature

2008-07-08 Thread dseketel at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4 from dseketel at redhat dot com 2008-07-08 17:58 --- Created an attachment (id=15876) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15876&action=view) display warnings instead of error Second opus of the patch. It appears that the patch makes g++ not capable of com

[Bug fortran/36759] C_LOC and characters greater then one in length.

2008-07-08 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 18:27 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Subject: Re: C_LOC and characters greater then one in > length. > > My mistake, I did not see that in the standard. > > It still would be nice however to have the non-standard feature for

[Bug fortran/36759] C_LOC and characters greater then one in length.

2008-07-08 Thread brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org
--- Comment #4 from brtnfld at hdfgroup dot org 2008-07-08 18:40 --- Subject: Re: C_LOC and characters greater then one in length. I reported it to intel , their flag (-e03) used for checking for non-standard Fortran 2003 features missed it. pgi compiler with -Mstandard also missed i

[Bug c++/34963] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE completely broken destructor

2008-07-08 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 18:42 --- Subject: Bug 34963 Author: simartin Date: Tue Jul 8 18:41:35 2008 New Revision: 137637 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=137637 Log: gcc/cp/ 2008-07-08 Simon Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libgcj/34521] SSLEngine - Clone not supported (Null pointer) exception

2008-07-08 Thread jarygrove at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #5 from jarygrove at yahoo dot com 2008-07-08 18:44 --- Please close this bug Jary http://www.ldapsoft.com http://www.ldapadmintool.com -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34521

[Bug c++/34963] [4.3/4.4 regression] ICE completely broken destructor

2008-07-08 Thread simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 18:47 --- Fixed in 4.3 and 4.4. -- simartin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/36701] [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c

2008-07-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-08 19:55 --- When emit_group_store allocates stack temp to copy from register to stack, it should use the mode with the largest alignment. Does this patch make sense? --- expr.c.align2008-07-02 11:56:29.0 -0700 +

[Bug target/36701] [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c

2008-07-08 Thread drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from drow at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 20:26 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c It sounds plausible but I suggest you ask on gcc-patches, I can't review that. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/23455] tree load PRE is not working for global variables

2008-07-08 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 20:27 --- Fixed. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug testsuite/36332] [4.4 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/type-generic-1.c execution test on powerpc-*

2008-07-08 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 21:51 --- The tests fail on powerpc*-unknown-linux-gnu with 128-bit long doubles because __builtin_fpclassify claims that __LDBL_MAX__ is infinite, not normal. Here's a small testcase minimized from type-generic-1.c: #define F

[Bug middle-end/36701] [4.4 Regression] unaligned access in gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-7.c

2008-07-08 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2008-07-08 22:04 --- A patch is posted at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00671.html -- hjl dot tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/36567] Cannot use std::tr1::tie() with unordered_map<> of std::vector<>

2008-07-08 Thread dfeathers at omnitrol dot com
--- Comment #3 from dfeathers at omnitrol dot com 2008-07-08 22:35 --- Subject: Re: Cannot use std::tr1::tie() with unordered_map<> of std::vector<> Paolo - Sorry for this delayed response. a) The problem does not exist on gcc 4.2 (Intel), but I do not have a 4.2 PPC x-compiler - on

[Bug objc++/36723] [4.4 Regression] massive obj-c++ failures at rev.137407

2008-07-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 22:39 --- Also seen on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. /home/dave/gnu/gcc-4.4/gcc/gcc/testsuite/obj-c++.dg/bad-receiver-type.mm:14: warning: invalid receiver type '' Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0015134c in

[Bug middle-end/36743] [4.4 Regression] ICE in pow_c4_i4 when compiling snapshot of 07/04/08 under HP-PA Linux

2008-07-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-08 23:08 --- Patch to fix this bug has been applied. -- danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] New: natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2008-07-08 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
c=boehm --enable-java-awt=xlib--enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-linux-futex --without-system-libunwind --with-cpu=generic --enable-languages=c,c++,objc,fortran,obj-c++,java,ada Thread model: posix gcc version 4.4.0 20080708 (experimental) [trunk revision 137646] (GCC) Running under gdb

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2008-07-08 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot |

[Bug tree-optimization/36766] [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

2008-07-08 Thread dberlin at dberlin dot org
--- Comment #1 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-09 01:56 --- Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] natGC.cc:229: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault need .ii file at least. On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:15 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > -- >