[Bug c/30260] Enumeration types and enumeration constants erroneously given unsigned types

2008-02-12 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from manu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 14:25 --- This bug is confirmed. -- manu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug rtl-optimization/31360] [4.2 Regression] RTL loop invariant is not aggressive enough

2008-02-12 Thread alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com
--- Comment #36 from alexandre dot nunes at gmail dot com 2008-02-12 13:13 --- I think it's worth to note here the implications of the fix to PR31849. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31360

[Bug target/34141] gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90 fails on Intel Darwin9

2008-02-12 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr
--- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2008-02-13 07:10 --- Subject: Re: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/intrinsic_set_exponent.f90 fails on Intel Darwin9 > Can this be closed then? I think so. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34141

[Bug c++/35144] [4.3 regression] ICE in generate_element_copy

2008-02-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 13:27 --- Not doing SRA seems harder than just handling it, because the decision whether SRA should be done and whether to use block copy is done on vars, which both are scalarizable. Testing following patch: 2008-02-12 Jakub J

[Bug tree-optimization/35164] [4.3 regression] Unable to coalesce ab SSA_NAMEs

2008-02-12 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 12:00 --- But this one doesn't seem to be inlining related. Until vrp1 pass the var in question (D.20903) has just one SSA_NAME (D.20903_14) in the whole function, non-ab, initialized at the beginning of the loop and nothing be

[Bug c++/35117] Vectorization on power PC

2008-02-12 Thread eyal at geomage dot com
--- Comment #32 from eyal at geomage dot com 2008-02-12 11:28 --- (In reply to comment #31) > > I would appriciate, however, a further explaination about this issue. > The explanation has to deal with CPU architecture and is not related to > compilers. In case of cache miss the memory l

[Bug c++/30303] [4.2 regression] ICE with invalid constructor definition

2008-02-12 Thread reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 07:31 --- The ICE disappeared on the 4.2 branch. Probably due to 2008-02-12 Jason Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/33916 * Revert: 2006-10-17 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/

[Bug c++/34950] [4.2/4.3 Regression] ICE in svn boost math toolkit

2008-02-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-12 23:19 --- It looks like simply deleting from dependent_type_p: /* If there are no template parameters in scope, then there can't be any dependent types. */ if (!processing_template_decl) { /* If we are n

[Bug c++/34774] [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] templates, enumerations, overflow, ice

2008-02-12 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from jason at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-02-13 07:08 --- Subject: Bug 34774 Author: jason Date: Wed Feb 13 07:08:11 2008 New Revision: 132283 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=132283 Log: PR c++/34774 * pt.c (value_dependent_expression_

[Bug middle-end/34621] [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c:32: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:2785

2008-02-12 Thread geoffk at geoffk dot org
--- Comment #17 from geoffk at geoffk dot org 2008-02-13 07:50 --- Subject: Re: [4.3 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/va-arg-25.c:32: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at calls.c:2785 On 12/02/2008, at 10:41 PM, hjl dot tools at gmail dot com wrote: > --- Comment #16 from

<    1   2