--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32772
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32845
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32912
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32967
--- Comment #4 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:37 ---
This should be fixed now.
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
--
dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:39 ---
This should be fixed now (it was a VN/PRE interaction)
I believe echristo bootstrapped with this flag just yesterday, in fact.
The testcase is certainly not crashing for me anymore
Please reopen if it is still brok
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 01:03 ---
C testcase (at -O3):
typedef float t[52];
void f(t * epstab, int ib, int ib2)
{
int i;
for(i = 0;i<52;i++)
{
ib2 = ib+2;
(*epstab)[(ib)-1] = (*epstab)[(ib2)-1];
ib = ib2;
}
}
--
pinsk
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33025
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33011
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33007
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32975
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33017
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32970
--- Comment #6 from echristo at apple dot com 2007-08-10 02:29 ---
I hadn't but I have now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32722
--- Comment #10 from satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in 2007-08-10 03:27
---
Hi ,
Any plans to backport.
regards
Satya
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32987
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 03:00
---
write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if "Infinite" or "NaN"
is emitted and in that case exits before calling output_float. So if execution
is reaching output_float, one or both of the aforemen
--- Comment #11 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2007-08-10 03:50 ---
Subject: Re: TAB in FORMAT: accept extension, warn with -std=f*
On Fri, Aug 10, 2007 at 03:27:33AM -, satyaakam at yahoo dot co dot in
wrote:
>
> Any plans to backport.
>
No.
Please
--- Comment #2 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 04:02 ---
This was introduced in revision 127273.
--
danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #6 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
04:42 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
> write_float uses isfinite (n) and isnan (n) to determine if "Infinite" or
> "NaN"
> is emitted and in that case exits before
--- Comment #10 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-10 05:48 ---
The patch works fine for me.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #5 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-10 05:40 ---
Subject: Bug number PR33039
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00643.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Comment #6 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2007-08-10
06:25 ---
The glibc patch now is included in glibc-2.6.1, the failing test cases are not
known anymore. Closing the report.
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What|Remov
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo