My automated nightly build failed to bootstrap this evening on
i386-pc-linux-gnu. This is for trunk rev. 127311, and the error is:
/home/fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-20070809/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/fx/gfortran_nightbuild/ibin-20070809/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/fx/gfortran_nightbuild/irun-20070809/i386
--- Comment #4 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 08:43 ---
It worked well with r126900, but did not with r126976
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
--- Comment #1 from irar at il dot ibm dot com 2007-08-09 08:44 ---
I got this too on x86_64-linux.
I guess the guilty patch is
r127306 | chaoyingfu | 2007-08-09 01:29:12 +0300 (Thu, 09 Aug 2007) | 213 lines
since it added the function fixed_zerop:
* tree.c
...
(fix
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.99 (Angel)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc
bison-2.3-2.1.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-5.1.noarch
expect-5.43.0-5.1.sparc
gcc-4.1.1-30.1.sparc
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparcv9
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc64
gl
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.99 (Angel)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u:
binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc
bison-2.3-2.1.sparc
dejagnu-1.4.4-5.1.noarch
expect-5.43.0-5.1.sparc
gcc-4.1.1-30.1.sparc
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparcv9
glibc-2.5-3.1.sparc64
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc
glibc-devel-2.5-3.1.sparc64
gl
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 09:08 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33029 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 09:08 ---
*** Bug 33030 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33029
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 09:18 ---
Because placement new is required to reproduce this bug and the front-end is
where the broken code happens already, then the patch to fix PR 29286 is the
cause.
The problem is in build_new_1 where we create a temp
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 09:35
---
What about the following:
Index: gfortran.h
===
--- gfortran.h (revision 127224)
+++ gfortran.h (working copy)
@@ -1865,6 +1865,7 @@ typedef struc
--- Comment #4 from jbuehler at spirentcom dot com 2007-08-09 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=14045)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14045&action=view)
gcc 4.0.4 global register variable optimizer patch
The attached patch fixes the optimizer bug for gcc 4.0.4 and
gcc-4.3-20070727 fails with ICE on code:
---
template
struct a {
template
struct b {
template
void f()
{
struct g
{
~g()
--- Comment #4 from theodore dot papadopoulo at sophia dot inria dot fr
2007-08-09 12:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=14046)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14046&action=view)
A new more minimal test case
The same program was still working with gcc version 4.3.0 20
--- Comment #5 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 12:52 ---
It worked well with r126941, but did not with r126959
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
Hello!
The undefined variable LINUX_DYNAMIC_LINKER, included in the Variable LINK_SPEC
in the file gcc-4.2.1/gcc/config/arm/linux-elf.h lines 56-68 causes an error
during compilation of gcc-4.2.1/gcc/gcc.c at line 740. The error was:
path/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/gcc.c:740: error: expected , or ; before
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2007-08-09 14:15 ---
A patch is posted at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00450.html
--
hjl at lucon dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
When using the transfer intrinsic to convert a character string to an array of
integers, and the string does not fit exactly into the integer array data
block, the resultant integer array is scope dependent, with the same code
giving a different resultant integer array in different subroutines/prog
/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
/test/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsui
te/gfortran.dg/PR19754_2.f90 -O1 -pedantic-errors
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hp
pa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgfortran/.libs
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
/./libgfortran/.libs -L/test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hp
--- Comment #2 from matz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 15:50 ---
Fixed with my checkin of rev 127316.
--
matz at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 15:50 ---
Could you please tell us your gfortran version? ("gfortran -v", the gcc-version
line is of most interest.)
Not that TRANSFER is free of bugs, but it produces here 4.3.0 20070808
(x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) the same re
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 15:59 ---
This is undefined code, when I rewrote most of the transfer code for scalars, I
had asked what happens when the sizes did not match and everyone I asked said
it was undefined behavior.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #9 from dcb314 at hotmail dot com 2007-08-09 16:03 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> I suggest taking a technique from the STL and using an auto_array class
In practice, I find both STL and Boost are rarely used.
Such advanced tools are fine for experienced C++ programmers.
F
--- Comment #6 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 16:07 ---
It worked well with r126947, but did not with r126951
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
This has probably already been submitted by Daniel Franke or Jerry DeLisle.
I am just trying to see if I can work this system.
FORTRAN NAMELIST Run Time Problem
The FORTRAN statement
READ(5, nml=CODE)
should read through the input file (connected to device number 5)
--- Comment #7 from sje at cup dot hp dot com 2007-08-09 17:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=14047)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14047&action=view)
untested patch
I can't reliably reproduce the problem but the attached patch may fix it. It
removes the sort and re
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:06 ---
I will commit n32/n64 support shortly.
--
daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 17:44 ---
I've created abranch for this work at
svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcj/gcj-eabi-branch
It's mostly done, but there are still some bugs. I'll post the patches to the
gcc list when they're in a fit state.
-
--- Comment #1 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
17:57 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unsatisfied symbol "lroundl" in file libgfortran.sl
The symbol is from misc_specifics.o.
Dave
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33038
--- Comment #5 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:05 ---
See comment #3. The installation manual explains the correct way to
configure and build. I'm closing this.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:07 ---
Yup, it's a bug.
We aren't really fixing bugs in the old front end though.
I'm closing it because this is a weird case and has a couple
simple workarounds.
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
Wha
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:39 ---
I think this is a duplicate of PR 33019.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33039
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:41 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00119.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2007-08/msg00122.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33038
--- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
18:41 ---
Subject: Re: New: Unsatisfied symbol "lroundl" in file libgfortran.sl
> The symbol is from misc_specifics.o.
It looks like lroundl there is an implementation using roundl. There
is an implementation of
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 18:54 ---
> This is undefined code, when I rewrote most of the transfer code for scalars,
> I
> had asked what happens when the sizes did not match and everyone I asked said
> it was undefined behavior.
Well, nonetheless gfor
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 19:14 ---
Right now, I'd rather work on something else.
Unassigning myself (for now, at least).
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org
--- Comment #8 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:24 ---
The regression was caused by the following patch
New Revision: 126951
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126951
Log:
2007-07-26 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
toplev/
* con
--- Comment #9 from andreasmeier80 at gmx dot de 2007-08-09 19:33 ---
I'm now testing the patch from Comment #7.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32941
The following reduced example, based on
http://www.lrz-muenchen.de/services/software/mathematik/gsl/fortran/, gives an
segmentation fault:
fgsl.f90: In function 'fgsl_multifit_fdfsolver_jac':
fgsl.f90:24: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
valgrind shows:
==21413== Invalid read of size 2
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:28 ---
Subject: Bug 33001
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:27:52 2007
New Revision: 127321
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127321
Log:
2007-08-09 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:37 ---
Subject: Bug 32813
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:36:27 2007
New Revision: 127322
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127322
Log:
2007-08-09 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:39 ---
Subject: Bug 32796
Author: pinskia
Date: Thu Aug 9 21:39:08 2007
New Revision: 127323
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127323
Log:
2007-08-09 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c/
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:39 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:40 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-09 21:45 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 33020
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00604.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:51
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> It looks like lroundl there is an implementation using roundl. There
> is an implementation of roundl using ceill, but ceill isn't available.
This has been fixed since, sorry for the b
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:54
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I have looked into this bug and I think it is an HP math lib bug. The 64 bit
> powf function is using %fr12R but not saving/restoring it the way it is
> supposed to. I have a query in
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:56
---
Still can't reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31. I'm starting to think that
printf might be broken there, after all. Since it's a corner case on a platform
that is not the current one, I'd like to close it as
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 21:58
---
The patch in the previous comment wasn't even building, here is a one that
regtests and that I submitted to review.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:03 ---
Subject: Bug 32987
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Aug 9 22:02:32 2007
New Revision: 127324
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=127324
Log:
2007-08-09 Tobias Burnus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fort
--- Comment #9 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:08 ---
FIXED for gfortran 4.3.0; gfortran now accepts the tab; it checks also at
compile time for the tab character and gives either a warning (-std=gnu/legacy)
or an error (-std=f95/f2003) if a tab has been found.
--
bu
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:20
---
Patch submitted for review.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2007-08-09 22:20 ---
Subject: Bug number PR 31629
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-08/msg00607.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 22:23 ---
Some more debugging - I modified gfc_trans_structure_assign to:
--
cm = expr->ts.derived->components; i = 1;
for (c = expr->value.constructor; c; c = c->next, cm = cm->next)
{
p
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Ke
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||32630
nThis||
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:27
---
Regarding the test case:
&codechar='Improper lower case name',X=-3.0/
Fortran 95 Standard 10.9.1 states:
"If a processor is capable of representing letters in both upper and lower
case, a group name or obj
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last recon
--- Comment #4 from jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:39 ---
Created an attachment (id=14048)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14048&action=view)
Candidate patch from 2005
Here's my patch from 2005 as requested.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:37
---
*** Bug 33019 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #5 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-09
23:30 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.dg/integer_exponentiation_2.f90 at -O1 and above
> Any results? I cannot reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31 (neither the
> original bug nor your testcase that gives differe
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:06
---
How on earth did that PR get assigned to me?
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:37
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 33039 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-09 23:38
---
This report is better than my own. :)
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31032
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32276
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:23
---
Closed, since Andrew says this can no longer be reproduced.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #8 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:25
---
Closed, as Sebastian says he cannot reproduce, and as Richard says there is
another testcase in PR31762.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31897
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32009
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:29
---
Apparently, this only affects libffi/java, so I've marked this P2, rather than
P1. However, build failures are nasty, since many people just do "configure;
make".
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
--- Comment #4 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:55
---
P5 unless/until a C/C++ testcase can be found; upgrade to P3 if found.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32964
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32914
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32898
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32855
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32853
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:51 ---
This is most likely caused by:
2005-09-09 Richard Henderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR debug/20998
* cp-tree.def (ALIAS_DECL): Remove.
* cp-lang.c (cp_init_ts): Remove support for it.
*
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32787
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32756
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:45
---
P5 until/unless a non-Ada example is found. Upgrade to P3 if so.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #21 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:44
---
I'm not convinced that there's anything to fix here; it sounds like we've just
traded which of two examples is better. If there is a bug here, please add a
note explaining, and upgrade back to P3.
--
mmitchel
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-08-10
00:41 ---
Subject: Re: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/nan_inf_fmt.f90 execution
> Still can't reproduce this on hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.31. I'm starting to think
> that
> printf might be broken there, after all.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32674
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32628
--- Comment #2 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:38 ---
What is 'gcjavac'?
--
tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32624
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32596
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32573
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32565
--- Comment #7 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-08-10 00:30
---
I believe this to be valid code.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32546
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32557
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32566
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32567
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32607
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
