--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28885
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25102
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 ---
Subject: Bug 28873
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 24866
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 20067
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25077
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006
New Revision: 116578
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 28873
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25077
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25102
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 24866
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 ---
Subject: Bug 28885
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:20 ---
Subject: Bug 20067
Author: pault
Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006
New Revision: 116579
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579
Log:
2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:25 ---
Here is the fix which I am testing, it just strips off the NON_LVALUE_EXPR that
fold will produce:
Index: pt.c
===
--- pt.c(revision 116576)
+++
--- Comment #11 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-08-30
05:26 ---
reported against 4.1; bootstrapped 4.1.2 CVS with this patch with no
regressions. ok to apply to the 4.1 branch?
Matthias
--
debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed:
What|Remov
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28873
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:33 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:34 ---
Helps to check the fixed box!
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 06:00 ---
Subject: Bug 26632
Author: kazu
Date: Wed Aug 30 06:00:35 2006
New Revision: 116580
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116580
Log:
PR middle-end/26632
* gcc.dg/pr26632.c: New.
Adde
m68k port quietly accepts -fstack-limit-symbol on ColdFire.
-fstack-limit-symbol causes gcc to output "trapcs".
However, ColdFire does not support any conditional trap.
--
Summary: m68k port quietly accepts -fstack-limit-symbol on
ColdFire
Product: gcc
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo