[Bug fortran/28885] ICE passing components of array of derived type

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 --- Subject: Bug 28885 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25102] Procedure for interface assignment must have two dummy arguments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 25102 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/28873] Cannot resolve subroutine calls when modules are used in different scopes

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:18 --- Subject: Bug 28873 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/24866] internal compiler error

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 24866 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug fortran/20067] gfortran: misleading error message resolving generic subroutine

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 20067 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25077] No error on attempt to redefine intrinsic assigments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 25077 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:18:36 2006 New Revision: 116578 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116578 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/28873] Cannot resolve subroutine calls when modules are used in different scopes

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 28873 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25077] No error on attempt to redefine intrinsic assigments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 25077 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/25102] Procedure for interface assignment must have two dummy arguments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 25102 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/24866] internal compiler error

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 24866 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran

[Bug fortran/28885] ICE passing components of array of derived type

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:19 --- Subject: Bug 28885 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug fortran/20067] gfortran: misleading error message resolving generic subroutine

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:20 --- Subject: Bug 20067 Author: pault Date: Wed Aug 30 05:19:34 2006 New Revision: 116579 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116579 Log: 2006-08-30 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR fortran/

[Bug c++/28886] [4.1/4.2 regression] Template specialization with array rejected

2006-08-29 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:25 --- Here is the fix which I am testing, it just strips off the NON_LVALUE_EXPR that fold will produce: Index: pt.c === --- pt.c(revision 116576) +++

[Bug c++/26670] attribute((packed)) sometimes not ignored for non-PODs

2006-08-29 Thread debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org
--- Comment #11 from debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org 2006-08-30 05:26 --- reported against 4.1; bootstrapped 4.1.2 CVS with this patch with no regressions. ok to apply to the 4.1 branch? Matthias -- debian-gcc at lists dot debian dot org changed: What|Remov

[Bug fortran/28885] ICE passing components of array of derived type

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/20067] gfortran: misleading error message resolving generic subroutine

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28873] Cannot resolve subroutine calls when modules are used in different scopes

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:31 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28873

[Bug fortran/25077] No error on attempt to redefine intrinsic assigments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/25102] Procedure for interface assignment must have two dummy arguments

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:32 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/24866] internal compiler error

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:33 --- Fixed on trunk and 4.1 Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/28873] Cannot resolve subroutine calls when modules are used in different scopes

2006-08-29 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 05:34 --- Helps to check the fixed box! Paul -- pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/26632] [4.1 Regression] spurious warning: value computed is not used

2006-08-29 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-30 06:00 --- Subject: Bug 26632 Author: kazu Date: Wed Aug 30 06:00:35 2006 New Revision: 116580 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=116580 Log: PR middle-end/26632 * gcc.dg/pr26632.c: New. Adde

[Bug target/28896] New: m68k port quietly accepts -fstack-limit-symbol on ColdFire

2006-08-29 Thread kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org
m68k port quietly accepts -fstack-limit-symbol on ColdFire. -fstack-limit-symbol causes gcc to output "trapcs". However, ColdFire does not support any conditional trap. -- Summary: m68k port quietly accepts -fstack-limit-symbol on ColdFire Product: gcc

<    1   2