--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28286
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28287
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28288
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28291
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28296
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28301
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28302
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28303
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28304
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28337
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28338
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28341
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28346
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28347
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28349
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28357
--- Comment #16 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:17
---
Contrived, or not, what should we do?
I stand by my position that the middle end should not try to load a
TREE_ADDRESSABLE type from memory in this way.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26577
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26938
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27316
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27329
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27397
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27425
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27492
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27493
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27494
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27572
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27667
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27668
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27952
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27961
--- Comment #5 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 03:42
---
The trick of using -pedantic-errors to turn every invalid warning into
rejects-valid is not useful. Downgrading to P2.
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
The RTEMS crossrpm specs fail on a Canadian cross for mingw32 as the versioned
'ln' (linked) of gcc the install-driver creates does not have the required
executable extension.
--
Summary: install-driver is missing $(exeext) from gcc-$(version)
Product: gcc
Versio
--- Comment #1 from chris at contemporary dot net dot au 2006-07-17 04:20
---
Created an attachment (id=11903)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11903&action=view)
Add $(exeext) to gcc-$(version).
The patch allows the RTEMS crossrpm build to complete without error.
#include
#include
template
void test(T t)
{
char c;
t(c);
};
int main()
{
test(std::toupper);
}
The g++ compiler(version higher than 4.0) complained that no matching function
for call to 'test()', and got the same
result with all of the functions list in cctype.
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:36 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 11108 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:36 ---
*** Bug 28401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #3 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:42
---
Subject: Bug 28250
Author: reichelt
Date: Mon Jul 17 04:42:24 2006
New Revision: 115516
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=115516
Log:
PR c++/28250
* name-lookup.c (pushdecl_may
--- Comment #4 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 04:43
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #1 from reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-17 05:22
---
We also get ICE without a previous error message for the following code:
==
#pragma pack(0.5)
==
bug.c:1: internal compiler error: tree check: expected integer_cst, have
re
101 - 139 of 139 matches
Mail list logo