The following code creates a bug box when compiled with
gnatmake -gnat05 bug-test.adb
the gcc-4.1.0 version needed a patch in erroutc.adb and s-wchcon.ad[sb] to
compile.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/academics/Modelling/bug-test $ gnatmake -gnat05 bug_test
gcc -c -gnat05 bug_test.adb
gcc -c -gnat05 edges
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 08:12
---
Bug confirmed, not i686-linux specific.
The problem is that the front-end sorts the different possibilities inside a
case statement so that a binary search can be performed at runtime by the
library. But, for ext
--- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 08:29
---
*** Bug 27760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 08:29
---
Already fixed on mainline, this was PR 27524.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 27524 ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Testcase, compiled with -trigraphs:
#error "BUG??!"
produces:
x.c:3:2: error: #error "BUG|"x.c:3:12: warning: trigraph ??! converted to |
The diagnostics are good, but there should be a newline in-between those.
-Chris
--
Summary: Bad diagnostic emission when #error contains a tri
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 08:30
---
Right you are. Closed as duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19777 ***
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #15 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 08:30
---
*** Bug 27765 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19777
I am trying to build gcj without using gtk as the awt peer. However, even if I
specify --enable-java-awt=qt, --enable-java-awt=xlib or even
--enable-java-awt=no configure still dies saying I don't have pango installed:
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for pangoft2... Package
--- Comment #1 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-05-27 08:54 ---
Confirmed on both branches.
$ gcc -c -gnat05 nodes.ads
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.2.0 20060511 (experimental) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) GCC error: |
| in save_g
--- Comment #2 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:03
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> make check-gfortran RUNTESTFLAGS="-target_board=unix/-fbounds-check"
With mainline today and the patch for PR 19777, the list is failure is now:
gfortran.dg/cray_pointers_2.f90
gfortra
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:06
---
Subject: Bug 27552
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat May 27 09:06:01 2006
New Revision: 114152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114152
Log:
Backports from mainline
PR fortran/2755
--- Comment #7 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:06
---
Subject: Bug 26551
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat May 27 09:06:01 2006
New Revision: 114152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114152
Log:
Backports from mainline
PR fortran/2755
--- Comment #3 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:06
---
Subject: Bug 27320
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat May 27 09:06:01 2006
New Revision: 114152
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114152
Log:
Backports from mainline
PR fortran/2755
--- Comment #8 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:07
---
Fixed on mainline and 4.1.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:07
---
Fixed on mainline and 4.1.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:08
---
Fixed on mainline and 4.1.
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #16 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 09:41
---
Subject: Bug 19777
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat May 27 09:41:42 2006
New Revision: 114153
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114153
Log:
PR fortran/19777
* trans-array.c (gfc_
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to fail||4.1.2
K
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 10:23 ---
I'll fix it.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|una
--- Comment #9 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 12:21 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
Good work, knew this would be hard!
Ray
On Sat, 27 May 2006, jvdelisle at gcc
dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 20
The attached code ICE's with the mainline, but not gcc 4.1.1 or 4.0.3.
> gcc -O1 -ftree-vectorize -c a.c
a.c: In function o:
a.c:4: internal compiler error: tree check: accessed operand 2 of nop_expr with
1 operands in analyze_siv_subscript_cst_affine, at tree-data-ref.c:2335
> gcc -v
Using bui
--- Comment #1 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2006-05-27 12:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=11518)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11518&action=view)
code that triggers the ICE
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27779
--- Comment #10 from patchapp at dberlin dot org 2006-05-27 14:00 ---
Subject: Bug number PR27773
A patch for this bug has been added to the patch tracker.
The mailing list url for the patch is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-05/msg01407.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #4 from bero at arklinux dot org 2006-05-27 15:30 ---
After some digging around, the other peers need an implementation of
classpath_jawt for this to work -- I've attached a working implementation for
the Qt peer to classpath bug #27555
--
bero at arklinux dot org changed
--- Comment #8 from ben at decadentplace dot org dot uk 2006-05-27 15:30
---
Created an attachment (id=11520)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11520&action=view)
proposed patch (with doc and test changes)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7302
--- Comment #5 from bero at arklinux dot org 2006-05-27 15:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=11521)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11521&action=view)
Patch for gcc adding support for the Qt classpath_jawt bits from bug 27555 to
libjava
--
bero at arklinux dot org
--- Comment #11 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 15:57
---
Subject: Bug 27773
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat May 27 15:57:36 2006
New Revision: 114158
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=114158
Log:
2006-05-27 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 15:58
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 16:25 ---
Works for me with gcc (GCC) 4.2.0 20060524 (experimental).
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #9 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-05-27 16:32 ---
I just build a mingw32 cross with c,ada from 4.1.1 prerelease (using native
Linux c,ada GCC 4.1.0 as base compiler) and it invokes properly ming32-gcc:
$ mingw32-gnatmake -Pp -v
Parsing Project File "p".
Checking projec
--- Comment #10 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-05-27 17:09 ---
Oops sorry, didn't see that my log show the problem you mentionned (and not the
one I imagined), the library building tools of gnatmake when using a project
file are indeed looking for and using native tools (it "succeed
--- Comment #7 from David at ham dot dropbear dot id dot au 2006-05-27
17:10 ---
I can confrim that the patched source tree compiles both the test case provided
and the original code.
Thank you very much, Paul, for sorting this out so quickly!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_b
--- Comment #3 from p dot vanhoof at oma dot be 2006-05-27 17:21 ---
This bug is specific to x86_64. The "long i, j" in the code is essential in
reproducing this problem (with "int i, j" there will be no ICE). Hence the
behavior is platform specific.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 17:32 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Right you are. Closed as duplicate.
FX, Are you comming to the GCC summit?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27765
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 17:38 ---
Compiling with -trigraphs, produces good results
[kudzu:trunk/objdir/gcc] pinskia% ./cc1 t.c -trigraphs -quiet
t.c:1:2: error: #error "BUG|"
Now without it does not:
[kudzu:trunk/objdir/gcc] pinskia% ./cc1 t.c -qui
--- Comment #11 from laurent at guerby dot net 2006-05-27 18:41 ---
Bernd, could you contribute (attach here) your Makefile and ada RTS changes so
that Ada build with AVR target succeeds? I see lots of ICE due to the target
8bit-ness while building the Ada RTS so I assume you cut it or d
--- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-27 19:10
---
This bug does not occur with g77, as this version of the
test program shows:
$ cat testdirect.f
program testdirect
implicit none
integer a (100)
integer i,j,k,ier
real x
intege
--- Comment #20 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-05-27 19:24 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 07:11:01PM -, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
>
>
--- Comment #6 from borisdusek at cmail dot cz 2006-05-27 20:23 ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Apparently CPPFLAGS is missing a -I for the newly built compiler's libstdc++
I borrowed a snip from libjava/Makefile.am section for xlib, which also needs
c++/libstdc++, then (since I am no au
--- Comment #21 from Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de 2006-05-27 20:24
---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu wrote:
> 27757 does not belong in this meta-bug. It is actually
> a regression with respect to a vers
--- Comment #22 from sgk at troutmask dot apl dot washington dot edu
2006-05-27 20:28 ---
Subject: Re: [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:24:31PM -, Thomas dot Koenig at online dot de
wrote:
>
> Do you know which version? We should mark 27757
--- Comment #11 from ray at ultramarine dot com 2006-05-27 20:53 ---
Subject: Re: Problems with direct access io
I believe I said that in the bug report.
On Sat, 27 May 2006, tkoenig at
gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #10 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 200
.exp
...
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes18
/home/ig25/gcc-bin/branches/gcc-4_1-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
version 4.1.2 20060527 (prerelease)
Not committing right now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27470
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 00:40
---
I am confirming this is a regression. The test program works fine on 4.0.2
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #11 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 03:20 ---
Testing the same patch for 4.1.2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26622
--- Comment #26 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 05:11 ---
Looks like it's fixed.
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
S
--- Comment #27 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 05:13
---
(In reply to comment #26)
> Looks like it's fixed.
No, just worked around.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #10 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 06:47 ---
Mine
--
aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned a
--- Comment #11 from aoliva at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-05-28 06:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=11522)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11522&action=view)
Patch that appears to fix the problem
This patch, that I'm testing now, appears to fix the bug. And it even ma
49 matches
Mail list logo
