--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:14 ---
The ICE is the same, but the cause is probably different as 25890 is an
ICE-on-undefined.
I think it's easiest to punt and return failure instead of asserting, but I
want to investigate how we reach the assertion failure in
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:16 ---
The bug here is that expand_compound_operation uses an unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT
for pos, while the argument to the "zero_extract" rtx's is a const_int, which
is signed. A negative value for zero_extract's position operand is
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:22 ---
I cannot reproduce Paul's testcase, but I found this one:
struct object
{
unsigned long mixed_encoding:1;
unsigned long encoding:8;
}
__attribute__ ((packed));
int search_object (struct object *ob)
{
return o
--- Comment #6 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:28 ---
Uhm, expand has a bug and creates an invalid
(insn 11 7 12 2 (set (subreg:SI (reg:QI 33) 0)
(zero_extract:SI (mem/s:QI (reg/v/f:SI 31 [ ob ]) [0 S1 A8])
(const_int 8 [0x8])
(const_int 1 [0x1]
--- Comment #1 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:47 ---
It seems that this PR is a duplicate of 25905.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25905 ***
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #7 from kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:47 ---
*** Bug 25919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
kkojima at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #13 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:53
---
One more question; how is the throw code supposed to work?
We allocate D.2069, initialize it, if there is a problem
during it initialization, we deallocate it, then
pass it to __cxa_throw anyway? This does not mak
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 08:59 ---
I am not so sure that it is a duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25919
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 09:47
---
Subject: Bug 25654
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:47:01 2006
New Revision: 110109
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110109
Log:
2006-01-23 Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ja
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 09:50
---
Subject: Bug 25654
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:50:07 2006
New Revision: 110110
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110110
Log:
2006-01-23 Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ja
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 09:54
---
Subject: Bug 25654
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 23 09:54:12 2006
New Revision: 110111
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110111
Log:
2006-01-23 Steven Bosscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ja
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 09:54
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #4 from etienne_lorrain at yahoo dot fr 2006-01-23 09:56
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> PR 23477 was fixed in 4.1.0 and not 4.0.3. This is still a dup of that bug.
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23477 ***
For me, 23477 is fixed in "GCC: (GNU) 4.0.3 200
--- Comment #3 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 09:59 ---
Reopening...
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 10:00 ---
Reopening for real...
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
--- Comment #5 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 10:01 ---
... to mark as duplicate for the 20051228-1.c failure.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25890 ***
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 10:01 ---
*** Bug 25919 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #64 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 10:01
---
Subject: Bug 24626
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 23 10:01:36 2006
New Revision: 110112
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110112
Log:
2006-01-23 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
S
--
bonzini at gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gnu dot org
|dot org |
--- Comment #65 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 10:06
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #39 from matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 10:32 ---
Gnah! It's even worse. I spoke too soon, and actually pre-3.4 (3.3 in fact)
has the behaviour _swapped_. I.e. using the example struct I have these
sizes (on i686):
3.3:normal 16, pragma 16, packed 12
4.1+patch: no
Try to compile the following preprocessed file:
PROBLEM: The file I wanted to post is too large. Where can I post it?
--
Summary: Internal compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
--- Comment #1 from wolfgang dot roemer at gmx dot net 2006-01-23 11:18
---
Created an attachment (id=10709)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10709&action=view)
The preprocessed file causing the error
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25921
--- Comment #40 from matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:21 ---
Mark, re your comment #38: (my comment #39 actually came before, but I forgot
to press "Commit" :-/ ) the #pragma pack(1) does not influence DECL_PACKED.
It is only set by attribute(packed). That's why the difference of beha
--- Comment #41 from matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=10710)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10710&action=view)
candidate patch
This patch contains some commented out test code I had in for playing around.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
Hi,
Here is my complaint:
The problem encountered under Linux x86_64 platform...
The following test code fails to compile with the dignostics:
'AAA<3>::member' has incomplete type
//Test code:
template
struct A
{
template // Type-
--- Comment #42 from matz at suse dot de 2006-01-23 11:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=10711)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10711&action=view)
Testprogram
This program generates the following output for 3.3-hammer-branch on x86-64:
S_normal_i size 8 alig
--- Comment #5 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 11:32 ---
Could you check again on trunk ? there have been lots of fixes in
handling of interfaces and this PR is likely fixed now.
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #6 from charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 11:33 ---
Should now work fine on trunk, there have been many fixes in handling of
interfaces, could you confirm ?
Arno
--
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #3 from SLTxLQEc4vuR5kMzK at anime dot net 2006-01-23 12:32
---
so is this a bug or not a bug? or user error?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24004
rget: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /scratch/gcc/configure --quiet
--prefix=/afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc --enable-languages=c++,fortran
--with-gmp=/usr/local/appl/gmp-4.1.4 --enable-checking=release
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.2.0 20060123 (experimental)
/afs/mpa/data/martin/ugcc/libexe
--- Comment #3 from michal017 at centrum dot sk 2006-01-23 12:50 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Hmm, I get only warning for this code:
> t.cc:10: warning: base class �class Foo� has a non-virtual
> destructor
>
You get the warning if you declare a constructor in the Bar class (checked
--- Comment #3 from ayers at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 13:03 ---
I've posted some patches for this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01532.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01533.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg01534.html
--
ayers a
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 13:17 ---
Your source is wrong, you forgot the template keyword.
The corrected line for NEWTYPE is
typedef typename A::template B::C NEWTYPE;
and this works on all compilers from 3.2.3 on.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
Hi, gcc team!
i unfortunately cannot use the bug db for this report because i am not
allowed to use this email address for websites, mailing lists, etc.
Bug summary: The two-arg form of std::random_shuffle() shuffles predictably
unless srand() is called beforehand.
GCC version:
gcc (GCC) 4.0.2
C
--- Comment #16 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:31
---
*** Bug 25921 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:33 ---
Related to PR 12455 which was fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #9 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 14:37 ---
I have verified that cc1226b also failed with -mtune=k8:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ada-2]$ make
/export/build/gnu/gcc-last/build-i686-linux/gcc/xgcc
-B/export/build/gnu/gcc-last/build-i686-linux/gcc/ -v
Reading specs from /export/bui
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:31 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25632 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-01-23 14:44 ---
Adding a buffer flush to "fd_alloc_r_at" seems to helped a lot - it now passes
the 65000 tests of 8 at a time and the 1048576 10 at a time tests with a small
buffer, but fails some where in the 262144 tests of 9 at a time with
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:50 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:43 ---
Confirmed, related to PR 10591.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Bu
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:51 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:56 ---
Subject: Bug 24437
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Jan 23 14:56:45 2006
New Revision: 110116
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110116
Log:
2006-01-23 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR mi
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 14:57 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:03 ---
Mine, this is fixed by the patch which fixes PR 25857.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #21 from charlet at adacore dot com 2006-01-23 15:12 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2 Regression] ACATS cdd2a01 cdd2a02 fail at runtime
> No real solution as of this writing, only a poor workaround: not compiling the
> support files with -gnato (overflow checks).
That's not reall
--- Comment #22 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:15
---
> That's not really an option, since these files must be compiled with
> -gnato (well at least report.adb) for proper operation of some ACATS tests.
Agreed. Can I install the front-end fix on the 4.1 branch the
--- Comment #9 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25315
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Jan 23 15:19:29 2006
New Revision: 110127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110127
Log:
2006-01-23 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Da
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:19 ---
Subject: Bug 25857
Author: pinskia
Date: Mon Jan 23 15:19:29 2006
New Revision: 110127
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110127
Log:
2006-01-23 Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Da
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:19 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:19
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNE
--- Comment #5 from dir at lanl dot gov 2006-01-23 15:20 ---
I think that the examples shown above now work. Here is the shortest new one to
fail - another bug I guess.
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran -o write25 write25.f
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% write25
read EOF di
--- Comment #10 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 15:21 ---
I have verified that c34006a and cc1226b are only new failures when -mtune=k8
is used.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25899
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2006-01-23 15:26 ---
current gcc-4.1 (rev. 110083) on my x86-64 box with
`-march=x86-64 -O2 -funroll-loops` fails too.
(enabled langs: c,c++)
Bootstrap comparison failure!
./c-format.o differs
./expmed.o differs
./i386.o differs
./reg-stack.o d
--- Comment #11 from hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:27
---
This might be another manifestation of the argument saving area with
-maccumulate-outgoing-args
(if it is so, either -fno-tree-ter or -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args should
solve it). I will try to look into it toni
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:29
---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFI
The initialized linked failures are the failures which block further
development for me at least.
PR 25886 is a huge failure as we are now over the 255 limit for tree codes for
some languages (well Objective-C++ only but it gives us a hint of what is to
come soon).
PR 25860 is an ICE due to SSA P
--- Comment #10 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:39
---
Testing the fix which Daniel Berlin recommended.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #2 from bonzini at gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:41 ---
This is nasty. I think that the easiest codes to remove are PARM_DECL and
RESULT_DECL.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25886
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|bootstrap failure |[4.2 Regression
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25259
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:48 ---
PR 25910: libgomp fails to compile on i686-linux-gnu.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libgomp incorrectly detects |[4.2 Regression] libgomp
|support for TLS
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:50 ---
PR 25865: libgomp dects TLS as working when it does not. Causes a build
failure on *-netbsd*.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:45 ---
PR 25636: reload is causing a write to read only memory, exposed by PRE
changes.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:47 ---
PR 25259: libgomp depends on stdint.h.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
515 (hiauly1)dave> gdb a87b59a
GNU gdb 6.3.50.20050226-cvs
Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are
welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions.
Type "show copying" to see the conditio
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|libgomp should not require |[4.2 Regression] libgomp
|perl to compile
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 15:51 ---
PR 25884: perl is now required to build GCC (libgomp).
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:06 ---
ICE in c-common.c due to PARM_DECL and ADDR_EXPR and not having visibility.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:07 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> ICE in c-common.c due to PARM_DECL and ADDR_EXPR and not having visibility.
That was PR 25861.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25925
--- Comment #12 from hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-23 16:13 ---
Created an attachment (id=10712)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10712&action=view)
Testcases
I am not sure -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -fno-tree-ter will solve the
problem.
This is the testcase I am us
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:16 ---
Fixed in 4.1.0.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:18 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:19 ---
Do you have a simple example?
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc.target/powerpc/pr18096- |[4.2 Regression]
|1.c fails on PPC |gcc.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfi
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:24 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|template specialisation not |[4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression]
|always found (partial
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25892
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25060
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22146
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25029
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21256
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20868
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25485
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20870
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25796
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25168
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25777
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20754
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25731
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20869
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20875
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25024
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25171
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24554
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16190
--- Comment #9 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-23 16:38 ---
Posted a patch.
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassi
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
