--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:06 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25018
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20864
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #8 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 19362
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 23152
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25066
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25053
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25391
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20862
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #10 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25068
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #15 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20244
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25064
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25067
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #12 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25307
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 20889
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25063
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:07 ---
Subject: Bug 25069
Author: pault
Date: Mon Dec 26 09:07:27 2005
New Revision: 109061
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109061
Log:
2005-12-26 Paul Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR fortran/
--- Comment #9 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:10 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #16 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 09:10 ---
fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 12:17 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 12:18 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #3 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 12:18 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:15 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:16 ---
fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:16 ---
fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:17 ---
Fixed on trunka nd 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:17 ---
fixed on trunka nd 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #4 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:18 ---
fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
--- Comment #11 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:18 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Sta
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 13:19 ---
Fixed on trunk and 4.1
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Stat
I just tried to compile the gcc-4.2 snapshot 20051224 with the Intel C
compiler. It said
1.
../../src/gcc-4.2-20051224/gcc/c-decl.c(4486): remark #593: variable
"type_as_written" was set but
never used
The source code is
tree type_as_written;
I have read the source code, and I agree with t
I'm getting an RTL checking bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-linux-gnu. The
bootstrap dies in stage2 like so:
/home/ghazi/tmpdisk/gcc-testing/42/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/ghazi/tmpdisk/gcc-testing/42/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_TARNAME=
--- Comment #17 from milan at cmm dot ki dot si 2005-12-26 15:54 ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created an attachment (id=10296)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10296&action=view) [edit]
> Patch to change delimitters to 4 bytes for unformatted records
>
> This is ne
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
I'm getting an RTL checking bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-linux-gnu. The
bootstrap dies in stage2 like so:
/home/ghazi/tmpdisk/gcc-testing/42/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/home/ghazi/tmpdisk/gcc-testing/42/build/./prev-gcc/
-B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
--- Comment #1 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2005-12-26
15:58 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.2 regression] RTL checking bootstrap
failure on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> I'm getting an RTL checking bootstrap failure on i686-unknown-linux-gnu.
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 16:04 ---
I did a successful rtl bootstrap (--enable-checking=yes,rtl) as recently as:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg00388.html
So this is at most a few weeks old.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 16:04 ---
I did a successful rtl bootstrap (--enable-checking=yes,rtl) as recently as:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-12/msg00388.html
So this is at most a few weeks old.
It c
--- Comment #3 from graham dot stott at btinternet dot com 2005-12-26
16:11 ---
Subject: Re: [4.2 regression] RTL checking bootstrap
failure on i686-unknown-linux-gnu
ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #2 from ghazi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 16:04 ---
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 17:13 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCON
--- Comment #5 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 18:01 ---
I don't know if this is fixed but the ICE no longer occurs as of about
2005-12-21.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25459
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 18:02 ---
Confirmed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 18:04 ---
I think this was fixed by:
2005-12-19 J"orn Rennecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cfgcleanup.c: Temporarily revert patches for PR 20070 till Bernd
comes back.
So I am going to close this, even though it i
Executing on host: /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/stage3-gcc/testsuite/../gfortran
-B/m
nt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/stage3-gcc/testsuite/../
/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuit
e/gfortran.dg/g77/20010610.f -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
-pedant
ic-errors -L/mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization
Keywords||ice-
--- Comment #5 from grahams at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 18:58 ---
Subject: Bug 25568
Author: grahams
Date: Mon Dec 26 18:58:56 2005
New Revision: 109064
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109064
Log:
PR middle-end/25568
* combine.c (simplify_shif
When I try to compile this source (the *.i and the *.c are the same beacuse
there aren't any include or whatever that can be processed by the
preprocessor):
int main(int ac, char **av) {
int eflags;
__asm__("pushfl\n"
"movl *%%esp,%%ebx\n":"=e" (eflags):);
}
I get this output:
# gc
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 20:31 ---
This is invalid code, 3.3 and above error out on it instead of producing an
ICE:
t.c: In function `main':
t.c:3: error: impossible constraint in `asm'
So this is fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #4 from eedelman at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 21:20
---
Here's a reduced testcase:
module ModelParams
implicit none
type ReionizationParams
real :: fraction
end type ReionizationParams
type CAMBparams
t
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #12 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 23:00 ---
Subject: Bug 25125
Author: kazu
Date: Mon Dec 26 23:00:18 2005
New Revision: 109065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109065
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/25125
* convert.c (conve
--- Comment #13 from kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-26 23:01 ---
Just checked in a patch for mainline (4.2.0).
--
kazu at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
We found this problem when building a ppc64 Linux kernel. It turns out r30 was
not preserved in a function that was using a local TOC. The compiler used was:
gcc version 4.0.3 20051201 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-5)
Although it seems to reproduce on older toolchains too (eg 3.4).
pinskia cut the
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 00:18 ---
Confirmed, not a regression.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 00:23 ---
Fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-04-16 17:30:38 |2005-12-27 00:38:08
date||
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-07-01 22:13:20 |2005-12-27 00:38:19
date||
--- Comment #16 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 00:58 ---
Created an attachment (id=10557)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10557&action=view)
Make hash_rtx and exp_equiv_p take MEM_ATTRS into accoutn
The test cases don't fail with GCC 4.2 anymore, but w
--
mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com
|dot org
--- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 01:07
---
Running /mnt/gnu/gcc-3.3/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/execute.exp
...
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr25125.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr25125.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL
--- Comment #15 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-27
01:41 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] (short) ((int)(unsigned short) + (int)) is done
in the wrong type
> --- Comment #14 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 01:07
> ---
> Running /mnt/gnu/gc
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 04:00
---
I have a fix for this. Will submit shortly.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
The library PNG_IO fails during elaboration while performing some sanity checks
on its internal functions.
This was created on i386-redhat-linux-gnu (Centos 4)
I have boiled this down to a pretty simple test case that looks like the issue
happens when a function is returning a constrained subtype
--- Comment #5 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 05:53 ---
There are three different, temporary work-arounds:
(i) Remove all "use ModelParams" from the contained procedures;
(ii) Add a "use ModelParams" to subroutine SetTimeSteps; or
(iii) Change the order of the contained pr
--- Comment #10 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:09
---
Subject: Bug 23172
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:09:13 2005
New Revision: 109075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109075
Log:
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
* c-d
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:09
---
Subject: Bug 25417
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:09:13 2005
New Revision: 109075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109075
Log:
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
* c-de
--- Comment #17 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:09
---
Subject: Bug 23171
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:09:13 2005
New Revision: 109075
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109075
Log:
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
* c-d
--- Comment #2 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:49
---
Subject: Bug 25439
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:49:21 2005
New Revision: 109076
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109076
Log:
PR c++/25439
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Re
--- Comment #3 from mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 06:50
---
Subject: Bug 25439
Author: mmitchel
Date: Tue Dec 27 06:50:10 2005
New Revision: 109077
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=109077
Log:
PR c++/25439
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Re
Hi,
just to bring the attention of gcc guys to this assembler error.
I came across recently when building Imagemagick under Gentoo and then found
out that others where experiencing the same exact error when compiling jpeg and
gimp-print.
Error looks like this:
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 07:39 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20653 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 07:39 ---
*** Bug 25574 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #46 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 07:43
---
Ping, Ping, Ping, Mark this was the bug which had the patch which made use of
COMPOUND_LITERAL_EXPR in the C++ front-end and see really the correct approach
rather than the patches you have been looking at.
--
--- Comment #47 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-27 07:45
---
I forgot one more thing is that this is still broken even after the patch for:
2005-12-26 Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR c++/23171, c++/23172, c++/25417.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
74 matches
Mail list logo
