[Bug c++/24907] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] "int x, ;" accepted

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:01 --- Subject: Bug 24907 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:01:53 2005 New Revision: 108462 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108462 Log: 2005-12-13 Petr Machata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/249

[Bug c++/25383] Crash when using certain function pointer in template -- but presence of another function will avoid the crash

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:06 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 25364 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug c++/25364] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Internal compiler error in templated C++

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:06 --- *** Bug 25383 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug debug/25023] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in def_cfa_1, at dwarf2out.c:792

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:08 --- Subject: Bug 25023 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:08:46 2005 New Revision: 108463 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108463 Log: PR debug/25023 PR target/25293 * expr.c

[Bug target/25293] ICE in def_cfa_1

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:08 --- Subject: Bug 25293 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:08:46 2005 New Revision: 108463 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108463 Log: PR debug/25023 PR target/25293 * expr.c (

[Bug c++/25331] FAIL: tmpdir-g++.dg-struct-layout-1/t028 cp_compat_[xy]_tst.o compile

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:12 --- Subject: Bug 25331 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:12:16 2005 New Revision: 108464 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108464 Log: PR c++/25331 * gcc.dg/compat/struct-layout-1_gene

[Bug c++/24907] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] "int x, ;" accepted

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:16 --- Subject: Bug 24907 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:16:24 2005 New Revision: 108467 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108467 Log: 2005-12-13 Petr Machata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR c++/249

[Bug debug/25023] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in def_cfa_1, at dwarf2out.c:792

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:17 --- Subject: Bug 25023 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:17:18 2005 New Revision: 108468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108468 Log: PR debug/25023 PR target/25293 * expr.c

[Bug target/25293] ICE in def_cfa_1

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:17 --- Subject: Bug 25293 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:17:18 2005 New Revision: 108468 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108468 Log: PR debug/25023 PR target/25293 * expr.c (

[Bug libfortran/24991] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gfortran build fails with - error:gthr-default.h: No such file or directory

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #42 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:18 --- Subject: Bug 24991 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:18:54 2005 New Revision: 108469 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108469 Log: PR libfortran/24991 * acinclude.m4: Include acx.

[Bug libfortran/24991] [4.1/4.2 Regression] gfortran build fails with - error:gthr-default.h: No such file or directory

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #43 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 08:31 --- Subject: Bug 24991 Author: jakub Date: Tue Dec 13 08:31:41 2005 New Revision: 108471 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108471 Log: PR libfortran/24991 * acinclude.m4 (LIBGFOR_CHEC

[Bug c/25384] New: gcc 4.0.2 compile fails on AIX 5.2: target bigtoc not found

2005-12-13 Thread tom at tiri dot li
Hello, How can I modify my system to get gcc-4 compiled on AIX 5.2 ? I always get the error "ld: target bigtoc not found". Snippet of log below. My System: core file size(blocks, -c) 1048575 data seg size (kbytes, -d) 131072 file size (blocks, -f) 1048575 max memory si

[Bug fortran/25385] New: ICE in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:1235

2005-12-13 Thread ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se
I havent verified this on any newer builds due to lack of resources. gfortran -v -save-temps -fPIC -pipe -fno-second-underscore -Wall -W -o matiere.o matiere.f Driving: gfortran -v -save-temps -fPIC -pipe -fno-second-underscore -Wall -W -o matiere.o matiere.f -lgfortranbegin -lgfortran -lm -shared

[Bug fortran/25385] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:1235

2005-12-13 Thread ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se
--- Comment #1 from ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se 2005-12-13 09:10 --- Created an attachment (id=10466) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10466&action=view) matiere.f Fortran file where ICE occurs -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25385

[Bug fortran/25385] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:1235

2005-12-13 Thread ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se
--- Comment #2 from ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se 2005-12-13 09:11 --- Created an attachment (id=10467) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10467&action=view) m_mb_control.mod Fortran module needed by matiere.f -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug fortran/25385] ICE in gfc_conv_ss_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.c:1235

2005-12-13 Thread ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se
--- Comment #3 from ake dot sandgren at hpc2n dot umu dot se 2005-12-13 09:12 --- Created an attachment (id=10468) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10468&action=view) matiere.s -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25385

[Bug c++/12341] Request for additional warning for variable shadowing

2005-12-13 Thread hayim at dv-networks dot com
--- Comment #2 from hayim at dv-networks dot com 2005-12-13 09:17 --- I agree. I hope this warning will be added in near future versions of g++. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12341

[Bug c++/25386] New: packed structs

2005-12-13 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
g++.dg/ext/packed3.C fails on default packed targets. I don't think this is the case. The questionable code (from the test case) really is struct Unpacked { int i; }; struct __attribute__ ((packed)) Packed { char c; int i; Unpacked u; }; and the test expects that you cannot bind Packed::u

[Bug c++/25386] packed structs

2005-12-13 Thread nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jbeulich at novell dot com AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gn

[Bug java/25368] ICE in make_class_data

2005-12-13 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 --- Subject: Bug 25368 Author: aph Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005 New Revision: 108474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108474 Log: 2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR java/25366

[Bug java/25366] ICE in do_resolve_class

2005-12-13 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:41 --- Subject: Bug 25366 Author: aph Date: Tue Dec 13 09:41:45 2005 New Revision: 108474 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108474 Log: 2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR java/25366

[Bug java/25368] ICE in make_class_data

2005-12-13 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 --- Subject: Bug 25368 Author: aph Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005 New Revision: 108475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108475 Log: 2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR java/25366

[Bug java/25366] ICE in do_resolve_class

2005-12-13 Thread aph at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 09:44 --- Subject: Bug 25366 Author: aph Date: Tue Dec 13 09:44:35 2005 New Revision: 108475 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108475 Log: 2005-12-13 Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR java/25366

[Bug c++/25388] New: friend decl doesn't declare opaquely

2005-12-13 Thread duz at sol-3 dot de
The source snippet at the bottom used to compile with gcc up to including 4.0.0, and stopped compiling with 4.0.1. The most recent version I tried was gcc version 4.1.0 20051202 and it failes. This also compiles fine with a number of other compilers, including Intel-C++, Comeau-C++, Visu

[Bug java/25389] New: File(new URI("file:./")) -> java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-12-13 Thread caolanm at redhat dot com
A regression in 4.1.0 which is not in 4.0.2, brings OOo java component registration to its knees. Sample source inline import java.net.URI; import java.io.File; class myfirstprog { public static void main(String args[]) { URI uriObject = null; try {

[Bug rtl-optimization/25367] -O1 -funroll-loops leads to segfault

2005-12-13 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 11:36 --- Yup. -- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug java/25389] File(new URI("file:./")) -> java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-12-13 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 11:46 --- Confirmed. URI.getPath() may return null and we don't check for that in the File(URI) constructor. A simple fix might be: diff -u -r1.59 File.java --- java/io/File.java 6 Nov 2005 20:28:00 - 1.59 +++ java/i

[Bug c++/25369] 4.0 regression: use of inline function in template class leads to undefined reference

2005-12-13 Thread peter dot soetens at fmtc dot be
--- Comment #3 from peter dot soetens at fmtc dot be 2005-12-13 12:06 --- Created an attachment (id=10469) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10469&action=view) Failure testcase $ g++ test_undefined_symb4_fail.ii -o test_undefined_symb4_fail /tmp/ccSLyh1a.o: In functio

[Bug c++/25369] 4.0 regression: use of inline function in template class leads to undefined reference

2005-12-13 Thread peter dot soetens at fmtc dot be
--- Comment #4 from peter dot soetens at fmtc dot be 2005-12-13 12:09 --- Created an attachment (id=10470) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10470&action=view) Minimal change to Failure testcase to cause success $ g++ test_undefined_symb4_ok.ii -o test_undefined_symb

[Bug fortran/20244] internal compiler error: in fold_convert, at fold-const.c:2003

2005-12-13 Thread paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr
--- Comment #13 from paul dot richard dot thomas at cea dot fr 2005-12-13 12:50 --- I am just now posting a patch for this bug. Andrew, I ignored your advice, "All of the above need to be fixed in the front-end and not in the middle-end where fold_convert resides." by doing the fixing

[Bug c++/25390] New: gcc-4.1.0: Invalid warning: control reaches end of non-void function

2005-12-13 Thread pmladek at suse dot cz
-- Summary: gcc-4.1.0: Invalid warning: control reaches end of non- void function Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassi

[Bug c++/25294] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Bogus "unterminated comment" error from #pragma comment

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:00 --- The problem isn't present on gomp-20050608-branch (where pragma handling has been revamped). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25294

[Bug rtl-optimization/20070] If-conversion can't match equivalent code, and cross-jumping only works for literal matches

2005-12-13 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #23 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:04 --- Subject: Bug 20070 Author: amylaar Date: Tue Dec 13 13:04:18 2005 New Revision: 108480 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108480 Log: PR rtl-optimization/20070 / part1 * flow.c

[Bug c++/25390] gcc-4.1.0: Invalid warning: control reaches end of non-void function

2005-12-13 Thread pmladek at suse dot cz
--- Comment #1 from pmladek at suse dot cz 2005-12-13 13:08 --- First, I am sorry for the first empty message. I pressed enter too fast. Well, I have got an invalid warning: control reaches end of non-void function with gcc-4.1.0-pre The reduced testcase looks like: --- cut --- namesp

[Bug libfortran/25377] libgfortran/io/transfer.c:2159 unlock_unit causes segfault

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:10 --- Can you attach a testcase? The gdb session doesn't really provide any useful info. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug debug/25023] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in def_cfa_1, at dwarf2out.c:792

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:14 --- Should be fixed in CVS. -- jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added St

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-13 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:16 --- (In reply to comment #17) > Created an attachment (id=10461) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10461&action=view) [edit] > Instruction stream (stripped) before scheduling > (insn/s 24 0 (set (su

[Bug fortran/25391] New: Module derived type issue

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
module mod1 type t1 real :: f1 end type t1 type t2 type(t1), pointer :: f2(:) real, pointer :: f3(:,:) end type t2 end module mod1 module mod2 use mod1 type(t1), pointer, save :: v(:) contains subroutine foo (x) use mod1 implicit none type(t2) :: x integer

[Bug rtl-optimization/23837] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] Wrong code with -fschedule-insns

2005-12-13 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #22 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:41 --- (In reply to comment #20) > Created an attachment (id=10463) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10463&action=view) [edit] > a full set of debugging dumps > > Re. comment #16, sorry, I didn't read

[Bug classpath/25389] File(new URI("file:./")) -> java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-12-13 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 13:47 --- Added a test to mauve that exposes this bug: gnu/testlet/java/io/File/newFileURI.java -- mark at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/25392] New: ICEs with -ff2c

2005-12-13 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
real function foo (x, y) real x, y foo = y - x do while (foo .gt. 180.) foo = foo - 360. enddo do while (foo .le. -180.) foo = foo + 360. enddo end ICEs in various places depending on the exact -O level and target. The problem is that __result_foo variable is given type not cor

[Bug web/25198] svn.html

2005-12-13 Thread jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #1 from jv244 at cam dot ac dot uk 2005-12-13 14:32 --- (In reply to comment #0) this is currently also discussed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-12/msg00300.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25198

[Bug c/25393] New: internal compiler error in gcc 4.2.0 20051205

2005-12-13 Thread klaue at dresearch dot de
/* gcc -v */ Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ./configure --prefix=/home/jklaue/local Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.0 20051205 (experimental) /* command line */ gcc -Wall -I. -O4 -ffast-math -D__X264__ -DHAVE_MALLOC_H -DHAVE_MMXEXT -DHAVE_SSE2 -DARCH_X86 -DSYS

[Bug middle-end/16373] -O2 and -O3 compiler switches do not "omit-frame-pointers" as the docs. describe.

2005-12-13 Thread Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de
--- Comment #5 from Ralf dot Wildenhues at gmx dot de 2005-12-13 14:37 --- Created an attachment (id=10471) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10471&action=view) doc patch for -fomit-frame-pointer Meanwhile, please fix the documentation to match what it does (and state

[Bug c/25393] internal compiler error in gcc 4.2.0 20051205

2005-12-13 Thread klaue at dresearch dot de
--- Comment #1 from klaue at dresearch dot de 2005-12-13 14:39 --- Created an attachment (id=10472) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10472&action=view) bug.i -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25393

[Bug libfortran/25139] [4.1/4.2 regression] "Invalid argument" error on I/O

2005-12-13 Thread dir at lanl dot gov
--- Comment #9 from dir at lanl dot gov 2005-12-13 14:39 --- I generated random I/O sequences doing 100,000 tests at each I/O operation count staring at five here is the shortest one to fail (somewhere in the eights) - [dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran -o write10 write10.f [dran

[Bug c++/25364] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Internal compiler error in templated C++

2005-12-13 Thread philb at filmlight dot ltd dot uk
--- Comment #8 from philb at filmlight dot ltd dot uk 2005-12-13 14:41 --- Disagree with known to work 4.0.2 - original report was from 4.0.2. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25364

[Bug c++/25388] friend decl doesn't declare opaquely

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 14:57 --- GCC 4.1 is correct, friend does not inject into the current scope at all. And it does fail with Comeau-C++ in strict mode. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug c++/25390] gcc-4.1.0: Invalid warning: control reaches end of non-void function

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:02 --- This is a dup of bug 20681. The problem is the break following the return. GCC does not remove it before lowering. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20681 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org cha

[Bug c++/20681] [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] wrong "control reaches" warning with switches

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:02 --- *** Bug 25390 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c/25393] internal compiler error in gcc 4.2.0 20051205

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:09 --- encoder/analyse.c:940: internal compiler error: in refers_to_regno_for_reload_p, at reload.c:6226 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25393

[Bug rtl-optimization/25393] internal compiler error in gcc 4.2.0 20051205

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:10 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24982 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug rtl-optimization/24982] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Bootstrap failure with ICE in refers_to_regno_for_reload_p

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:10 --- *** Bug 25393 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libfortran/25139] [4.1/4.2 regression] "Invalid argument" error on I/O

2005-12-13 Thread dir at lanl dot gov
--- Comment #10 from dir at lanl dot gov 2005-12-13 15:21 --- Removing the constraint of no read after write gives a slightly shorter one - [dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran -o write11 write11.f [dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% write11 At line 14 of file write11.f Fortran runti

[Bug c++/25369] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] use of inline function in template class leads to undefined reference

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:37 --- I can reproduce it with 3.4.5, 4.0.2, 4.0.3, 4.1.0 and 4.2.0. But I cannot reduce it right now. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/25369] [3.4/4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] use of inline function in template class leads to undefined reference

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 15:37 --- Forgot to say this worked with 3.3.5 so it is a regression. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libfortran/25377] libgfortran/io/transfer.c:2159 unlock_unit causes segfault

2005-12-13 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from jb at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 16:13 --- Unfortunately the goto blas library where I noticed this error is not free software. But here is a simple testcase that shows the same problem. File hello.c: #include #include #include #define NUM_THREADS 2 void

[Bug middle-end/25394] New: libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag'

2005-12-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
,ada --enable-checking=all Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.0 20051213 (experimental) -- Summary: libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag' Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/25395] New: equivalence to common block array broken

2005-12-13 Thread harald dot vogt at desy dot de
The following code shows the problem: program test common /abc/ mwkx(80) dimensionlistpr(20),lisbit(10),lispat(8) * This is badly compiled * == equivalence (listpr(10),lisbit(1),mwkx(10)) +, (listpr(10),lispat(1)) do i

[Bug fortran/25396] New: Operator overloading for array-valued functions gets shape incorrectly

2005-12-13 Thread jb at gcc dot gnu dot org
Consider the following testcase: module geometry implicit none interface operator(.cross.) module procedure cross end interface contains ! Cross product between two 3d vectors. pure function cross(a, b) real, dimension(3), intent(in) :: a,b real, dimension(3) ::

[Bug tree-optimization/25394] [4.2 Regression] libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag'

2005-12-13 Thread dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 18:14 --- Created an attachment (id=10473) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10473&action=view) Patch Please give this a try, tell me if it works -- dberlin at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: Wh

[Bug tree-optimization/25394] [4.2 Regression] libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag'

2005-12-13 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-13 18:48 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag' Attached .i. Dave --- Comment #3 from dave at hiauly1 dot h

[Bug java/24572] [4.0 regression] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:3983

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 18:59 --- This should be fixed by: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00218.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24572

[Bug testsuite/25352] xfail within dg-do command has no effect

2005-12-13 Thread janis at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 19:08 --- xfail within a dg-do command other than run has no effect, at least not with DejaGnu 1.4.4 used with GCC at least as far back as 3.0. The DejaGnu documentation doesn't mention the dg-* directives. The comments in dej

[Bug libstdc++/25191] exception_defines.h #defines try/catch

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #21 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:03 --- One more thing is that this is not documented anywhere (I can find) that libstdc++ does this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25191

[Bug classpath/25389] File(new URI("file:./")) -> java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-12-13 Thread tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from tromey at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:07 --- with the JDK I get this output: opsy. java myfirstprog urlObject is file:./ Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: URI is not hierarchical at java.io.File.(File.java:344) at my

[Bug debug/25023] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE in def_cfa_1, at dwarf2out.c:792

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:16 --- This is causing a bootstrap failure, the same as in comment #13 in fact. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25023

[Bug libstdc++/24660] versioning weak symbols in libstdc++

2005-12-13 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #16 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:27 --- Two extra fails with both versioning and debug associations active. FAIL: 20_util/memory/16505.cc (test for excess errors) FAIL: 25_algorithms/search_n/11400.cc (test for excess errors) For the first: #include //

[Bug target/25397] New: Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
With gcc 4.2 revision 108480 on x86-64, I got ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/gcc-4.2-blended/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /usr/gcc-4.2-blended/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /usr/gcc-4.2-blended/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -L/export/build/gnu/gcc-blended/build-x86_64-linux/gcc/..

[Bug libstdc++/24660] versioning weak symbols in libstdc++

2005-12-13 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #17 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:38 --- Created an attachment (id=10475) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10475&action=view) test case for first fail -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24660

[Bug libstdc++/24660] versioning weak symbols in libstdc++

2005-12-13 Thread bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #18 from bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 20:39 --- Created an attachment (id=10476) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10476&action=view) test case for second fail -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24660

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #1 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-13 21:03 --- Backout http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00899.html seems to fix this failure. -- hjl at lucon dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23815] Add -byteswapio flag

2005-12-13 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #26 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:11 --- Subject: Bug 23815 Author: tkoenig Date: Tue Dec 13 21:11:23 2005 New Revision: 108483 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=108483 Log: 2005-12-13 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PR

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:21 --- Is building a cross-compiler configured with --target=x86-64-elf likely to work up to this point and reproduce the problem? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25397

[Bug tree-optimization/25394] [4.2 Regression] libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structure, have 'name_memory_tag'

2005-12-13 Thread dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca
--- Comment #4 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2005-12-13 21:25 --- Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] libgcc2.c:2033: ICE: tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl common' structRO > Please give this a try, tell me if it works The build gets past the point of the ICE. H

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #3 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-13 21:33 --- I believe so. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25397

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:40 --- I get a different error with 108482: ./xgcc -B./ -B/home/pinskia/checkin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -isystem /home/pinskia/checkin/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /home/pinskia/checkin/x86_64-unknown-lin

[Bug target/19770] gcc.c-torture/compile/20050113-1.c: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2083

2005-12-13 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:43 --- Reconfirmed in 3.4.5. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19770

[Bug web/25198] svn.html

2005-12-13 Thread bje at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from bje at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:47 --- Fixed in revision 1.17 of htdocs/svn.html. -- bje at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:00 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I believe so. > I didn't have any luck with either x86-64-elf or x86-64-linux, bfd refused to build. So I looked for the latest x86-64 posting to gcc-testresults, which had x86_64-suse-l

[Bug libgcj/25398] New: .jar files held open twice at runtime

2005-12-13 Thread green at redhat dot com
When I examine gij processes running gcj-dbtool managed code on Linux with lsof, I see that we have two active file descriptors for every jar file. And strace confirms that we open each jar file twice (and keep them open). I don't know why this is happening, but it seems wrong. --

[Bug classpath/25389] File(new URI("file:./")) -> java.lang.NullPointerException

2005-12-13 Thread mark at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from mark at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:01 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: URI is not > hierarchical > at java.io.File.(File.java:344) > at myfirstprog.main(myfirstprog.java:16) Interesti

[Bug middle-end/25399] New: Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org
(I don't think this is the same as any of the similar bugs, although I could be wrong.) In this case the field assignments cover all of u, so none of it is actually live across the call, but dataflow can't figure this out. While this bogus warning is the only visible effect I know of, fixing thi

[Bug target/25127] internal compiler error: in rs6000_emit_prologue, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:14039

2005-12-13 Thread Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com
--- Comment #6 from Daniel dot Davies at xerox dot com 2005-12-13 22:12 --- (In reply to comment #0) > I try to install gcc 4.1; I have > > $ svn info > Path: . > URL: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches/gcc-4_1-branch > Repository UUID: 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 > Revision:

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread hjl at lucon dot org
--- Comment #6 from hjl at lucon dot org 2005-12-13 22:12 --- Created an attachment (id=10477) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10477&action=view) A testcase I got gnu-13:pts/7[26]> ./xgcc -B./ unwind-dw2.i -S -fPIC -O2 /export/gnu/src/gcc-blended/gcc/gcc/unwind-dw2.

[Bug middle-end/25399] Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:33 --- Actually reading the RTL, it would not help register pressure at all since the set is done right before the call to bar and is not pull out of the loop. What is happening is that u is being assigned a pesdu registe

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread joern dot rennecke at st dot com
--- Comment #7 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-12-13 22:39 --- Subject: Re: Bootstrap failed pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: >--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 21:40 >--- >I get a different error with 108482: >./xgcc -B./ -B/home

[Bug middle-end/25399] Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:42 --- One more thing If I do: struct ss { unsigned short a; unsigned short b; }; union uu { unsigned int all; struct ss parts; }; #include extern void bar(union uu); extern void baz(); void foo() { for(;;) { u

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:51 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Could you please send me the preprocessed source for this? /* Compile with -O2 -m32 -fPIC */ typedef float DFtype __attribute__ ((mode (DF))); typedef _Complex float DCtype __attribute__ ((

[Bug middle-end/25399] Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 22:54 --- (In the original example) note the bit vectors at beginning and end of blocks show 120 as live throughout the loop, although it isn't really. That's why I think it affects register pressure. GRA does do some munging

[Bug bootstrap/25397] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread joern dot rennecke at st dot com
--- Comment #9 from joern dot rennecke at st dot com 2005-12-13 23:03 --- Subject: RFA: fix bootstrap/25397 part 2 (Was: Re: Bootstrap failed) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > > >/* Compile with -O2 -m32 -fPIC */ > > ... Thanks. I have attached a patch. 2005-12-13 J"or

[Bug middle-end/25399] Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 23:03 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In the original example) note the bit vectors at beginning and end of blocks > show 120 as live throughout the loop, although it isn't really. That's why I > think it affects register pre

[Bug bootstrap/25397] [4.2 Regression] Bootstrap failed

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Keyw

[Bug middle-end/25399] Another bogus 'clobbered by longjmp' message

2005-12-13 Thread dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from dalej at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-13 23:19 --- This slight modification shows another problem: when the message refers to an inlined copy of a variable, it points to the inlined function body and variable rather than the place where the problem is. In the followi

[Bug fortran/25401] New: improper runtime bounds check error when using arbitrary length arrays

2005-12-13 Thread cummings at cacr dot caltech dot edu
I am compiling a Fortran 77 program with gfortran 4.0.2 and the -fbounds-check flag. When the program runs, I get a message "Fortran runtime error: Array reference out of bounds". The same program runs just fine when compiled with either g77 3.x or g95 4.x and the -fbounds-check flag. The gist o

[Bug fortran/25401] improper runtime bounds check error when using arbitrary length arrays

2005-12-13 Thread cummings at cacr dot caltech dot edu
--- Comment #1 from cummings at cacr dot caltech dot edu 2005-12-14 00:10 --- Created an attachment (id=10478) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10478&action=view) test case showing incorrect runtime bounds check failure Here is a simple code illustrating the problem.

[Bug fortran/25401] improper runtime bounds check error when using arbitrary length arrays

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 00:18 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19777 *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug fortran/19777] -fbounds-check catches non-existent bounds violation

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-14 00:18 --- *** Bug 25401 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/25402] New: [4.2 Regression] PCH is broken

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
While bootstrapping I noticed: checking for compiler with PCH support... no checking for enabled PCH... no And also the following tests fail: FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 -g (test for excess errors) FAIL: g++.dg/pch/empty.C -O2 (test for excess

[Bug middle-end/25402] [4.2 Regression] PCH is broken

2005-12-13 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http:

  1   2   >