[Bug c++/23723] [4.1 Regression] "undefined reference" with -g and const empty struct

--- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-09-08 07:36 --- Reassign to Mark Mitchell, since his patch caused this and he requested to be assigned in this case. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/23723] [4.1 Regression] "undefined reference" with -g and const empty struct

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 07:40 --- This one I'm not sure I'm going to sign on for permanently. :-) The patch in question reverted an earlier patch which had itself caused problems. Does your platform use DWARF2, or stabs? -- http://

[Bug middle-end/8743] receiving result from __builtin_return_address() beyond stack top causes segfault

--- Additional Comments From eddy at opera dot com 2005-09-08 07:54 --- Subject: Re: receiving result from __builtin_return_address() beyond stack top causes segfault Yes, that's one of the work-arounds I considered: but has an inconvenient problem - when shared libraries are loading,

[Bug libgcj/23763] Runtime.getRuntime().exec() signalling

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 4.0.1 Known to work||3.3.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug target/23775] [4.1 Regression] wrong code in argument passing

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 09:08 --- Reduced testcase: extern "C" double cos(double); extern "C" void abort(void); double x_from_z(double pitch=0, double stereo=0); // __attribute__((const)); double x_from_z(double pitch, double stereo) { r

[Bug fortran/23373] Functions returning pointers with pointer argument

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 09:20 --- Subject: Bug 23373 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 09:20:08 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-expr.c gcc/t

[Bug fortran/23373] Functions returning pointers with pointer argument

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 09:21 --- Patch applied to trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/19269] transpose(reshape(...)) of character array segfaults.

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 09:24 --- After discussion on fortran@, I'll take a look at the library thing too. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug debug/23776] New: configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH

I have such an error while configuring gcc [EMAIL PROTECTED] komp]# ./../gcc-4.0.1/configure loading cache ./config.cache checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking target system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu checking for a BSD compatible in

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] New: Does not remove all references to var

The tree optimizers cannot remove all references to multilib_exclusions_var, while RTL does. -- Summary: Does not remove all references to var Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE Sever

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 10:00 --- Created an attachment (id=9689) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9689&action=view) reduced testcase from gcc.i Testcase. Compile with -O2, compare asm and tree-vars dump. Note: testcase

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

-- What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23777

[Bug tree-optimization/22348] [4.0 Regression] Execution continues past end of for loop end condition with optimisation enabled

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 10:09 --- Subject: Bug 22348 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 10:09:04 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c++/23723] [4.1 Regression] "undefined reference" with -g and const empty struct with dwarf-2

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 11:03 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Does your platform use DWARF2, or stabs? With dwarf-2, I could reproduce this but using stabs I could not. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/23778] New: [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

We are using a testing-script to test our fortran suite. With GCC 4.1.0 2005-08- 19 our script fails to log all output. Any output before the fortran program was run is missing from the redirected console (bash in our case). The fortran program in question: PROGRAM HELLO DO 10, I=1,2

[Bug bootstrap/23776] configure: error: no acceptable cc found in $PATH

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 11:06 --- Do you have a compiler installed? You need a compiler installed to build/install GCC. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug fortran/23778] [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

--- Additional Comments From T dot Farago at lumc dot nl 2005-09-08 11:07 --- Created an attachment (id=9690) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9690&action=view) test file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23778

[Bug fortran/23778] [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

--- Additional Comments From T dot Farago at lumc dot nl 2005-09-08 11:08 --- Created an attachment (id=9691) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9691&action=view) Fortran source file compile with "gfortran -save-temps hello.f90 -o hellof90" -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bug

[Bug libfortran/23778] [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

-- What|Removed |Added Component|fortran |libfortran GCC build triplet|../gcc-4.1- | |20050819/configure -v --|

[Bug preprocessor/23779] New: '-C' option produces wrong output

Hi! We use gcc version 3.4.4 with cygwin running on WinXP: $ gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/3.4.4/specs Configured with: /gcc/gcc-3.4.4/gcc-3.4.4-1/configure --verbose --prefix=/usr --exec-prefix=/usr --sysconfdir=/etc --libdir=/usr/lib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --ma

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:02 --- Even more reduced: extern void f(char *const *); void g (char **o) { static const char *const multilib_exclusions_raw[] = { 0 }; const char *const *q = multilib_exclusions_raw; f (o); while (*q++)

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:04 --- Reduced testcase: static const char *const multilib_exclusions_raw[] = {0}; struct obstack { char *next_free; }; static struct obstack multilib_obstack; int main (int argc, const char **argv) { const cha

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:09 --- With Paolo's testcase we get the following tree dump in .ch (after copy loop header): g (o) { static const char * const multilib_exclusions_raw[1] = {0B}; const char * const * q; static const char * c

[Bug c++/23780] New: Suboptimal initialisation of array of class with do-nothing constructor

Compile with -O3 : struct X { int i; X(){} }; void f() { X x[1024]; } gcc inlines the constructor, but fails to eliminate the now empty loop. Observed in all the versions and targets I have easily to hand (2.95, 3.[234], 4.0; x86, x86_64, powerpc, sparc). -- Summary: Suboptimal init

[Bug c++/23780] Suboptimal initialisation of array of class with do-nothing constructor

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:35 --- Fixed on the mainline (for 4.1) by removing the empty loops. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/22348] [4.0 Regression] Execution continues past end of for loop end condition with optimisation enabled

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/23775] [4.1 Regression] wrong code in argument passing

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 12:46 --- And here is a C testcase: double cos(double); void abort(void); double x_from_z(double pitch, double stereo); // __attribute__((const)); double x_from_z(double pitch, double stereo) { return 1.0/cos(stere

[Bug objc/20574] [4.1 Regression] weird error message after a parse error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:08 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug objc/19324] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] weird message for interface way in implementation

-- Bug 19324 depends on bug 20574, which changed state. Bug 20574 Summary: [4.1 Regression] weird error message after a parse error http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20574 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug objc/19324] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] weird message for interface way in implementation

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:09 --- Fixed on the mainline and is harder to fix any where else so closing as fixed since this is just a diagnostic problem. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug objc/19324] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] weird message for interface way in implementation

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:10 --- Subject: Bug 19324 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 13:09:50 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-parser.c gcc/tes

[Bug objc/20574] [4.1 Regression] weird error message after a parse error

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:10 --- Subject: Bug 20574 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 13:09:50 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-parser.c gcc/tes

[Bug objc++/16816] obj-c++ parser error with multi-colon selectors

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:14 --- Fixed for 4.1.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESO

[Bug objc++/16816] obj-c++ parser error with multi-colon selectors

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 13:15 --- Subject: Bug 16816 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 13:14:41 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c gcc/tests

[Bug tree-optimization/23350] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-transform.c:2418

--- Additional Comments From dorit at il dot ibm dot com 2005-09-08 13:54 --- (In reply to comment #4) > This bit is actually included in Keith's versioning-for-alignment patch > (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-08/msg01372.html), which hopefully is > going to be approved soon (

[Bug rtl-optimization/23324] [4.1 Regression] unsigned bitfield in struct not accessed correctly at -O2 and above

--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 14:03 --- This seems to be a serious problem introduced by PR middle-end/9997 fix, at least if I understand it right. The testcase I'm looking at is, on ppc64-linux -m32 -O2: extern void abort (void); #define A(x) if (

[Bug libgcj/23182] instanceof sometimes fails if compiled with -findirect-dispatch

--- Additional Comments From aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 14:09 --- I found the cause of this bug. A line of code was incorrectly removed from pop_type_0() when the new verifier was added, a fairly long time ago. This patch should fix it. Index: expr.c ===

[Bug middle-end/23623] volatile keyword changes bitfield access size from 32bit to 8bit

--- Additional Comments From m dot reszat at kostal dot com 2005-09-08 15:12 --- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > I will try and dig up the EABI for PowerPC > > > Note this also happens on ARM where (in the EABI) it is definitely a bug None of the documents I foun

[Bug target/15397] [3.4 only] [g77] c float function called from fortran gives wrong result

--- Additional Comments From harald dot vogt at desy dot de 2005-09-08 15:34 --- (In reply to comment #7) gfortran has changed the default! Looking in the gfortran manual the -fno-f2c is now the default and -ff2c will switch back to the g77 default. Therefore gfortran gives a correct re

[Bug libstdc++/23781] New: Implicit conversion from NULL to list::iterator

This code compiles, and should not. #include int main( ) { std::list< float >::iterator l_it= NULL ; } Replacing list per vector, it does no more compile, which is a better result. I am not a C++ expert, but after a short reading of the slt_list.h file, I guess that the problem is thet ther

[Bug fortran/19928] Reference of constant derived type component causes failure

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 16:07 --- Subject: Bug 19928 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 16:06:55 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-array.c trans-expr.c

[Bug fortran/19928] Reference of constant derived type component causes failure

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 16:09 --- Patch applied to trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 19928, which changed state. Bug 19928 Summary: Reference of constant derived type component causes failure http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19928 What|Old Value |New Value --

[Bug target/23240] gcc.c-torture/execute/pr23135.c execution fails

--- Additional Comments From sje at cup dot hp dot com 2005-09-08 16:34 --- This test uses vectors. It looks like the vector code for IA64 was written and tested on Linux (which is little-endian) and this test fails on HP-UX which is big-endian. The program below prints '1500 1300' on

[Bug c++/23771] [4.0/4.1 regression] Constant template argument not recognized as such

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug target/23775] [4.1 Regression] wrong code in argument passing

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|REOPENED

[Bug c/23782] New: -Os +22%: gcc-3.4.4 does it in 230 bytes, gcc-4.0.2-pre in 281 bytes

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/projet/gujin$ gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: i486-linux-gnu Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable- languages=c,c++,java,f95,objc,ada,treelang --prefix=/usr --enable-shared -- with-system-zlib --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-nls --without-included- gettext --enable-t

[Bug libstdc++/23781] Implicit conversion from NULL to list::iterator

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 17:30 --- Note ICC also accepts this code too. -- What|Removed |Added Known to fail|

[Bug swing/16540] GlassPane intercepting of MouseEvents flaky.

--- Additional Comments From abalkiss at redhat dot com 2005-09-08 18:19 --- This has been fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESO

[Bug tree-optimization/15911] VRP/DOM does not like TRUTH_AND_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:20 --- This would be fixable inside VRP. Essentially we would need to insert chains of ASSERT_EXPRs to represent various predicates: D.1613_3 = x_2 > ; D.1614_5 = y_4 <= 6665; D.1615_6 = D.1613_3 && D

[Bug middle-end/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124 (fold bug)

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:25 --- What's the status of this bug? Do we still ICE? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21076

[Bug tree-optimization/23777] Does not remove all references to var

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:26 --- There is another way of fixing this to force ccp do look at those array references even though the statement has aliased loads. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124 (fold bug)

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-08 18:29 --- Passing on x86 and x86_64-linux (same situation as in my #4 comment). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21076

[Bug middle-end/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124 (fold bug)

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:33 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Passing on x86 and x86_64-linux (same situation as in my #4 comment). > OK, thanks. Closing. It can always be re-opened later. -- What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/21076] [4.1 Regression] ACATs ICE cxh1001 at tree-vrp.c:124 (fold bug)

--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:35 --- > Passing on x86 and x86_64-linux (same situation as in my #4 comment). Yup. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21076

[Bug tree-optimization/22333] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c34007p c34007r c45282b spurious discriminant CONSTRAINT_ERROR

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:37 --- What's the status of this bug? -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/22333] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c34007p c34007r c45282b spurious discriminant CONSTRAINT_ERROR

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:42 --- Thread starts: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00102.html >From the looks of the thread it looks more likely a front-end bug rather than >a tree-opt bug. -- What|Removed

[Bug fortran/15326] ICE with assumed length character strings

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:46 --- Subject: Bug 15326 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 18:46:06 Modified files: gcc/fortran: ChangeLog trans-array.c trans-expr.c

[Bug ada/22333] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c34007p c34007r c45282b spurious discriminant CONSTRAINT_ERROR

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:47 --- (In reply to comment #5) > Thread starts: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-09/msg00102.html > > From the looks of the thread it looks more likely a front-end bug rather than a tree-opt bug. Thanks. --

[Bug target/23783] New: gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c triggers an ICE

Consider a reduced version of gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c: typedef void *(*T)(void); void f1 (void) { ((T) 0)(); } arm-none-eabi-gcc -O2 triggers an ICE /home/kazu/calls.c: In function 'f1': /home/kazu/calls.c:7: error: unrecognizable insn: (call_insn 12 11 13 1 (parallel [ (se

[Bug fortran/15326] ICE with assumed length character strings

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:51 --- Patch committed to trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 15326, which changed state. Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/19242] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_function_call, at fortran/trans-expr.c:1106

-- Bug 19242 depends on bug 15326, which changed state. Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/22518] ICE in gfc_conv_function_call for character function with LEN=length(arg)

-- Bug 22518 depends on bug 15326, which changed state. Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 15326, which changed state. Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug fortran/15809] ICE Using Pointer Functions

-- Bug 15809 depends on bug 15326, which changed state. Bug 15326 Summary: ICE with assumed length character strings http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15326 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug swing/19845] Swing ToolTipManager and getLocationOnScreen

--- Additional Comments From abalkiss at redhat dot com 2005-09-08 18:51 --- *** Bug 22830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/22518] ICE in gfc_conv_function_call for character function with LEN=length(arg)

--- Additional Comments From rsandifo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:54 --- Patch applied to trunk. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

-- Bug 19276 depends on bug 22518, which changed state. Bug 22518 Summary: ICE in gfc_conv_function_call for character function with LEN=length(arg) http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22518 What|Old Value |New Value ---

[Bug target/23783] [4.1 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/calls.c triggers an ICE

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc.c- |[4.1 Regression] gcc.c- |torture/compile/calls.c |torture/compile/calls.c

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:57 --- Subject: Bug 23691 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 18:56:50 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl2.c gcc/testsu

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 18:59 --- Subject: Bug 23691 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 18:58:38 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:01 --- Fixed in 4.0.2. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESO

[Bug c++/23771] [4.0/4.1 regression] Constant template argument not recognized as such

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:02 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23691 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/23691] [4.0 Regression] `mpl_::bool_::value' is not a valid template argument for type `bool' because it is a non-constant expression

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:03 --- *** Bug 23771 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Bug 23691 depends on bug 23771, which changed state. Bug 23771 Summary: [4.0/4.1 regression] Constant template argument not recognized as

[Bug tree-optimization/15911] VRP/DOM does not like TRUTH_AND_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From law at redhat dot com 2005-09-08 19:04 --- Subject: Re: VRP/DOM does not like TRUTH_AND_EXPR On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 18:20 +, dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > --- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 > 1

[Bug tree-optimization/15911] VRP/DOM does not like TRUTH_AND_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:07 --- (In reply to comment #10) > it's fairly straightforward for a programmer (or better > yet some automated code generator) to create these "obtuse" predicates. > Good point. I'll work on a fix. --

[Bug fortran/23201] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:30 --- Definitely an FE oddity. The operand scanner is told to get the operands of a COMPONENT_REF that's accessing a non-existant field: (gdb) ptu stmt substr.ktbuf = D.485; (gdb) ptu expr substr.ktbuf; (gdb)

[Bug tree-optimization/23350] [4.1 Regression] ICE in vect_update_ivs_after_vectorizer, at tree-vect-transform.c:2418

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:38 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/23201] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:41 --- Fortran bug, moving target milestone to 4.2.0. -- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.1

[Bug target/22481] [4.1 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2000 with -O3 -fpeel-loops

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:45 --- Fixed and I cannot reproduce this any more. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug bootstrap/22313] [4.1 Regression] gcc HEAD as of 2005/07/05 fails to profiledbootstrap

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:49 --- This works for me with binutils 2.15. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22313

[Bug c++/23708] [4.0/4.1 Regression] Non-inline function incorrectly treated as inline when using precompiled headers

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 19:55 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug tree-optimization/23115] [4.1 Regression] -ftree-vectorize generates wrong code

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:03 --- Before: if (x_16 < x_26) goto ; else goto ; :; # x_4 = PHI ; :; if (x_16 > n_17) goto ; else goto ; :; # n_5 = PHI ; :; After: x_4 = x_16 < x_26 ? x_26 : x_16; n_5 = 1 ? n_17 : x_16; That 1

[Bug libfortran/23784] New: close doesn't reset ioparm on error exit

-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.1/configure --prefix=/home/ig25 --enable-languages=c,f95 Thread model: posix gcc version 4.1.0 20050908 (experimental) -- Summary: close doesn't reset ioparm on error exit Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/23049] [4.1 Regression] ICE with -O3 -ftree-vectorize on 4.1.x

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:14 --- (In reply to comment #12) > in fold but we don't try to fold 0 == 0 first. And to confirm this, this is either a DOM or fold bug, fold is not considered recursive, maybe it should be in this case. --

[Bug tree-optimization/23082] [4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:746

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:17 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/23142] [4.1 regression] ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-08 20:21 --- Diego one liner fixes this regression on both platforms. -- What|Removed |Added UR

[Bug ada/23141] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-08 20:21 --- Diego one liner fixes this regression on both platforms. -- What|Removed |Added UR

[Bug ada/23141] [4.1 Regression] ACATS FAIL c45651a fixed point wrong code

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-08 20:26 --- Closing -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/23142] [4.1 regression] ACATS FAIL cxaa017 character processing wrong code

--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-09-08 20:27 --- Closing -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/23437] [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] error: ... cannot appear in a constant-expression

--- Additional Comments From may at cavs dot msstate dot edu 2005-09-08 20:33 --- I applied that patch, but am still having the same problem. Any ideas? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23437

[Bug libfortran/23483] [mingw32] Fortran runtime I/O error on correct program

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:50 --- It was indeed a duplicate, it is now fixed. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 23262 *** -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug libfortran/23262] [mingw32] rewind truncates file

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:50 --- *** Bug 23483 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libstdc++/23781] Implicit conversion from NULL to list::iterator

--- Additional Comments From gdr at integrable-solutions dot net 2005-09-08 20:55 --- Subject: Re: Implicit conversion from NULL to list::iterator "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Note ICC also accepts this code too. yes, but that is irrelevant. We don

[Bug libfortran/23778] [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:57 --- This is duplicate of PR 20179 (and one more reason to fix this one!). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23778

[Bug target/23356] FLT_EVAL_METHOD not defined on openbsd3.4

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:58 --- Change component to target. -- What|Removed |Added Component|libfortran

[Bug libfortran/23778] [Regression] Printout resets console buffer

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:59 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20179 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/20179] cannot mix C and Fortran I/O

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-08 20:59 --- *** Bug 23778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

  1   2   >