--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
20:17 ---
Note T(T&) is still a copy constructor, just not one which takes a constant
reference.
Also note:
it really bolls down to this testcase:
int f(int&);
int f();
int g(void)
{
return f(1);
}
If we get rid
struct S
{
void *s[256];
};
struct T
{
long t[23];
struct S *u;
};
extern struct T
#ifdef __ia64__
__attribute__((model (small)))
#endif
v;
void *
foo (void)
{
return v.u->s[0];
}
ICEs on gcc-4_0-branch at -O2, but did not ICE before the PR target/21412 patch
was checked in.
The only di
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18893
--- Additional Comments From yhlin at sdesigns dot com 2005-05-17 20:44
---
Reading the output assembly twice, it's true that they are equivalent, it's
just that the div is run in the branch delay slot of bnez in the firt case.
It seems we need strict prologue/epilogue for __asm__ stat
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|daney at gcc dot gnu dot org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
||dot org
Status|ASSIGNED
The bootstrap fails in, I believe, stage 3 on a server with 4 x86_64 CPUs
running Suse. Same thing happens with version 3.4.3. This particular one was
done with make -j 2, but I also tried on one cpu and the same thing happens.
I did configure and make in an object directory different from the one
--- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17 21:12
---
Particularly the change that matters is ia64_expand_load_address, which no
longer splits it. src is small_addr_symbolic_operand in this case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21632
--- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-05-17 21:24
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #8)
> > - yes, however as the loigical extention of:
> >"a null reference is undefined" => "may trap" => "will trap"
> >is simply wrong, and is not justify
gcc version 4.1.0 20050517 (experimental)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% cpp-4.0 < /dev/null
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% cpp < /dev/null
# 1 ""
# 0 ""
# 1 ""
# 1 ""
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~% cpp < /de
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2005-05-17 21:39 ---
(In reply to comment #44)
I've tested PR19664 patch + updated PR20218 patch + v3 patch
and they work fine on amd64. I'll test fixes soon on powerpc
on testcase from PR21382 too.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-17 21:40
---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ headers should have pop/push
of the visibility around the declarations
pcarlini at suse dot de wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-17 19:05
> -
executing the below code snippet in jython:
gcc version 4.0.1 20050508 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.0-6)
Jython 2.1
import javax.swing as swing
win = swing.JFrame("JYTHON")
win.size = (100, 100)
win.show()
and closing the window from the window manager results in the following:
(.:29481): GLib-GObj
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
21:47 ---
Subject: Bug 19664
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-17 21:47:13
Modified files:
gcc/cp : ChangeLog decl2.c
Log message:
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-17 21:50 ---
Mark, is
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00180.html
OK for mainline as well as 4.0?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19664
--- Additional Comments From jconner at apple dot com 2005-05-17 21:50
---
Patch committed to mainline on 13 May 2005.
--
What|Removed |Added
URL|
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
21:55 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21250 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
21:55 ---
*** Bug 21634 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From mark at codesourcery dot com 2005-05-17 21:58
---
Subject: Re: libstdc++ headers should have pop/push
of the visibility around the declarations
hjl at lucon dot org wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2005-05-17 21:50
> ---
--- Additional Comments From pcarlini at suse dot de 2005-05-17 22:00
---
> One of HJ's patches is a middle-end patch, and I'm not sure I know
> enough to review it. I'd have to start by researching the ELF spec, for
> example, and we've found that various version of binutils have wei
The following code we miss one ccp optimization:
struct f
{
int i;
};
int g()throw()
{
f a;
a.i = 1;
f *a1 = &a;
int *i = &a1->i;
return *i; /* This should be turned into a.i */
}
We get right now:
Visiting statement:
a1_3 = &a;
Lattice value changed to CONSTANT &a. Adding SSA edges
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-17
22:10 ---
Your glibc headers do not match the library which you have installed.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21128
--- Additional Comments From t dot muhlhofer at lse dot ac dot uk
2005-05-17 22:15 ---
Oh... damn!
Shoulda seen this.
Thanks! Sorry about the bug.
T
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21633
Version:
gcc-java-4.0.0-5 from FC4 rawhide
Test Case:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.io.InputStream;
import java.net.URL;
public class URLTest {
public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException {
// replace this with any jar on your system
With LAST_UPDATED: "Tue May 17 13:57:35 UTC 2005" in a unified tree, it
built (with one new test failing compared to "Tue May 17 06:38:21 UTC 2005").
With "Tue May 17 19:08:13 UTC 2005", I get:
...
/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/hp/combined/cris-sim/./gcc/
-nostdinc -B/home/hp/combin
The SPEC CPU2000 tests bzip2, gap, and gcc cause mainline GCC to
segfault when built on powerpc64-linux with:
-m32 -O2 -ftree-vectorize -maltivec -mabi=altivec \
--param ggc-min-expand=0 --param ggc-min-heapsize=0
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
00:52 ---
Subject: Bug 18220
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 00:52:17
Modified files:
libjava: Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
01:00 ---
Subject: Bug 18220
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 01:00:16
Modified files:
libjava: ChangeLog
libjava/testsuite/
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 01:05
---
libjava.lang/Process_3.java should now fail if 'sed' is not available.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From anh_vn_vo at yahoo dot com 2005-05-18 01:06
---
After further checking, the run-time support was not built. In fact, running
any Ada code containing Ada task triggers "failed run-time assertion : Tasking
not implemented on this configuration" error message.
I will attach default.c (preprocessed, completely standalone) as soon as
bugzilla gives me the chance. Here what happens:
<55 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /tmp>gcc -c -O3 -o default.o default.c
default.c: In function 'print_defaults':
default.c:673: internal compiler error: in get_indirect_ref_operands, at
t
--- Additional Comments From arjones at simultan dot dyndns dot org
2005-05-18 04:41 ---
Created an attachment (id=8916)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8916&action=view)
Compressed (otherwise 250K) standalone preprocessed source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 05:57
---
This happens on Linux as well.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:04
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18434 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
St
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
06:04 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21173 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
06:04 ---
*** Bug 21640 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:04
---
*** Bug 20089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:09
---
Do you still reproduce this? I suppose I've not bootstrapped with anything
other than alphaev67 in a while, so this might be an ev4 bug...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
06:11 ---
There were two major patches which went in during this time. The CFG inliner
and the Jeff Law's patch,
either could have caused this.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
101 - 142 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
