[Bug libfortran/21471] 'POSITION = "APPEND"' doesn't seem to work

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 07:24 --- This one is fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |

[Bug c/21502] [4.0/4.1 Regression] small data relocation mismatch

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 07:33 --- Subject: Bug 21502 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 07:33:31 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog c-decl.c Added files:

[Bug c/21502] [4.0/4.1 Regression] small data relocation mismatch

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 07:34 --- Subject: Bug 21502 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 07:34:34 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c/21502] [4.0/4.1 Regression] small data relocation mismatch

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 07:35 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/17192] Functions returning character pointer via argument are broken

--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 08:10 --- It does still compile, but does still not return the right answer. The problem disappears if "integer" is used instead of "character*5". The tree dump (obtained with -fdump-tree-original) is: s (__result,

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 08:15 --- Subject: Bug 19807 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 08:14:45 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c tree-ssa-propa

[Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 08:15 --- Subject: Bug 19639 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 08:14:45 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c tree-ssa-propa

[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] New: BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3

Another performance bug in the same vein as bug 21485. The BYTEmark floating point emulation benchmark sees a regression 3.4.3 -> 4.0.0 with profiled optimization. Relevant flags are: -static -O3 -march=athlon-xp -fomit-frame-pointer -fprofile-{generate,use} I took the advice given last time; th

[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3

--- Additional Comments From jbucata at tulsaconnect dot com 2005-05-11 08:35 --- Created an attachment (id=8858) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8858&action=view) preprocessed test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21507

[Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor

-- Bug 19639 depends on bug 19807, which changed state. Bug 19807 Summary: fold does not fold &a[4]-1 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19807 What|Old Value |New Value

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 09:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 09:08 --- Always forget to set target milestone. -- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/21506] [4.1 regression] [m68k-linux] ICE in verify_initial_elim_offsets during bootstrap

-- What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21506

[Bug tree-optimization/19639] Funny (horrible) code for empty destructor

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 09:14 --- With optimization we now get void foo() () { unsigned int ivtmp.0; struct Foo * const this; register struct Foo * D.1740; struct Foo[2] * D.1739; struct NonPod x; : :; return; } aka fixed.

[Bug target/21508] New: non-optimal code with __builtin_signbit

This testcase: int test (double a) { return __builtin_signbit (a + 1.0); } produces quite non-optimal code when compiled with '-O2' (-fomit-frame-pointer): test: subl$12, %esp ! xorl%eax, %eax ! movl$1072693248, %edx ! movl%eax, (%esp) ! mo

[Bug tree-optimization/19507] missed tree-optimization (constant for the rest of the function)

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 09:35 --- Mainline now has void foo(const Flag&) (f) { const bool D.1718; int D.1717; struct Flag * const this; const bool D.1713; int D.1712; struct Flag * const this; bool D.1707; bool retval.1; b

[Bug target/21501] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2082

nymous_args = 0 @ link register save eliminated. @ lr needed for prologue mov r3, #-67108864 sub r3, r3, #128 add r0, r0, r3 bx lr .size foo, .-foo .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.1.0 20050511 (experimental)" While d

[Bug c++/21509] New: [3.3 regression] -Wformat=2 incorrectly warns about string literalness

Consider #include void foo(int i) { printf("Hello World %d!\n", i); printf(&"Hello World %d!\n"[0], i); printf(&"Hello World %d!\n"[6], i); } > g++-3.3 -c c-format.C -Wformat=2 > g++-3.4 -c c-format.C -Wformat=2 c-format.C: In function `void foo(int)': c-format.C:6: warn

[Bug c++/21495] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c/21342] [4.0/4.1 Regression] some incompatible external declarations not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2005-05-11 10:18 --- This is causing a regression on ia64: stage1/xgcc -Bstage1/ -B/usr/local/ia64-suse-linux/bin/ -DUSE_LIBUNWIND_EXCEPTIONS -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -peda

[Bug c++/21510] New: Possible bug

The following code contains a test template is_class which tries to determine, if the given argument is a class. Unlike other implementations it should not return true if the argument is a union. I have used the 'substitution failure is not an error' principle but g++ V3.3.5 (Debian 1:3.3.5-12)

[Bug c/21511] New: internal compiler error

GCC version, system type and options Using built-in specs. Target: i586-pc-linux Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man --infodir=/usr/share/info --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --disable-checking --host=i586-pc-linux --with-system-zlib Thread model: posix g

[Bug c/21511] internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From nkukard at lbsd dot net 2005-05-11 10:32 --- Created an attachment (id=8859) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8859&action=view) --save-temps output -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21511

[Bug libfortran/19478] reading back from /dev/null

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:34 --- Subject: Bug 19478 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 10:34:06 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog libgfortran: C

[Bug c/21511] internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From nkukard at lbsd dot net 2005-05-11 10:34 --- More findings... - Removing -O4 resolves the problem - Adding any -On value, where n is the optimization required results in an internal compiler error -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21511

[Bug libfortran/19478] reading back from /dev/null

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:39 --- Subject: Bug 19478 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 10:39:49 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug middle-end/21320] possible false positives for '$foo may be used uninitialized in this function'

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:43 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Is there an attribute to declare a function as 'will never return NULL'? > In this case it is true, the called function dereferences the pointer > to return before returning to the

[Bug c++/21509] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] -Wformat=2 incorrectly warns about string literalness

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:48 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c/21342] [4.0/4.1 Regression] some incompatible external declarations not diagnosed

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:50 --- (In reply to comment #5) > This is causing a regression on ia64: > > ../../gcc/stringpool.c:91: relocation truncated to fit: GPREL22 against > symbol > `empty_string' defined in .rodata section in libba

[Bug c/21511] internal compiler error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:51 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21173 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/21173] [4.0/4.1 regression] miscompiled pointer subtraction broke Linux kernel

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:51 --- *** Bug 21511 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/21481] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to crtstuff.c

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 10:55 --- Hm, this means there are more configure defines that need propagating to the target side. -- What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.1 Regression] Missing 'used unintialized' warning

-- What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.0 Regression] Missing|[4.1 Regression] Missing |'used unintialized' warning |'used unintialized' warning Target

[Bug c++/21483] Spurious 'control may reach end of non-void function' ... being inlined

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:00 --- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #1) > > > > *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 19699 *** > > Shouldn't it be marked as a duplicate of 19583 instead, and 19583 be reopened? No be

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:04 --- It can be reproduced in libgcj, with --enable-libgcj-multifile. Paolo -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|aph at gcc dot gnu dot org |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Status|REOPENED

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:06 --- I'll try to produce a reduced test case. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17845

[Bug bootstrap/21512] New: build failure on ppc-apple-darwin5.5 in libcpp

When compiling libcpp/init.c: ../../gcc/libcpp/init.c:59: parse error before `,' [9 times] This error happens on: TRIGRAPH_MAP s('=', '#') s(')', ']') s('!', '|') s('(', '[') s('\'', '^')s('>', '}') s('/', '\\') s('<', '{') s('-', '~') END which, once preprocessed, is: __

[Bug c++/21510] Possible bug

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:10 --- I don't think you used SFINF correctly. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21510

[Bug preprocessor/21512] [4.0/4.1 Regression] build failure on ppc-apple-darwin5.5 in libcpp

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:14 --- This is caused by moving libcpp to the toplevel. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug libfortran/19478] reading back from /dev/null

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:18 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/19292] [meta-bug] g77 features lacking in gfortran

-- Bug 19292 depends on bug 19478, which changed state. Bug 19478 Summary: reading back from /dev/null http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19478 What|Old Value |New Value

[Bug c++/21509] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] -Wformat=2 incorrectly warns about string literalness

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:19 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/21495] [4.0/4.1 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:20 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug middle-end/21492] [4.0/4.1 Regression] ICE in try_crossjump_to_edge

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:20 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/21508] non-optimal code with __builtin_signbit

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:25 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

Troubles with only GCC3.4.2

Hi Help! cc1plus is coredump only for GCC 3.4.2 1) BAD See Node_gcc342.cc Node_gcc342.ii $ g++ -v -save-temps -O0 -o Node_gcc342 Node_gcc342.cc Using built-in specs. Configured with: FreeBSD/i386 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.2 [FreeBSD] 20040728 /usr/libexec/cc1plus -E

[Bug rtl-optimization/21507] BYTEmark floating-point emulation: Regression with -O3

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:32 --- This is actually better on the mainline for PowerPC. -- What|Removed |Added Keywor

[Bug bootstrap/21512] [4.0/4.1 Regression] build failure on ppc-apple-darwin5.5 in libcpp

--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 11:41 --- This is a bootstrap bug, the bug is in the toplevel Makefile. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/21512] [4.0/4.1 Regression] build failure on ppc-apple-darwin5.5 in libcpp

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

--- Additional Comments From bonzini at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:18 --- Reduced test case: ==> Dummy.java <== package java.security; class Dummy { } ==> gnuX509Certificate.java <== package gnu.java.security.x509; class X509Certificate extends java.security.cert.X509Certificate

[Bug middle-end/20371] Some corner cases of MS bitfields don't work

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:25 --- Subject: Bug 20371 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 12:24:50 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog stor-layout.c tree.h Log

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:25 --- (In reply to comment #18) > Reduced test case: I saw something like this before in a different bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17845

[Bug java/17845] [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses

--- Additional Comments From paolo dot bonzini at lu dot unisi dot ch 2005-05-11 12:31 --- Subject: Re: [4.1 Regression] More problems with simple type names as superclasses >I saw something like this before in a different bug. > It must have been PR21436, which I also reported/disti

[Bug middle-end/21085] [4.0 Regression] Virtual memory exhausted with g++

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:46 --- Subject: Bug 21085 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 12:46:09 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug middle-end/21085] [4.0 Regression] Virtual memory exhausted with g++

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:49 --- Fixed also for 4.0.1. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/21085] [4.0 Regression] Virtual memory exhausted with g++

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 12:50 --- Subject: Bug 21085 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-4_0-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 12:49:54 Modified files: gcc/testsuite : Change

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-11 12:58 --- This is a most-wanted feature. Are there hope to see a patch landing for 4.1? Can the patch that Zdenek posted be updated for 4.1? Even if it's gross is surely better than nothing... -- What

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:00 --- I should note that loops with small constants bounds are now removed on the mainline. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17640

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

--- Additional Comments From rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:02 --- Only because they are completely peeled. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17640

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

--- Additional Comments From stevenb at suse dot de 2005-05-11 13:14 --- Subject: Re: empty loop not removed after optimization On Wednesday 11 May 2005 14:58, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote: > --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-11 > 12:58

[Bug tree-optimization/17640] empty loop not removed after optimization

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:15 --- I'll hack up something. -- What|Removed |Added CC|stevenb at suse dot de

[Bug middle-end/20371] Some corner cases of MS bitfields don't work

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:19 --- Fixed on mainline by patch applied today. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug other/17652] [meta-bug] GCC 4.1 pending patches

-- Bug 17652 depends on bug 20371, which changed state. Bug 20371 Summary: Some corner cases of MS bitfields don't work http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20371 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug rtl-optimization/10624] unroll-loops can't unroll nested constant loops

--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:22 --- So what's the status on this one? Fixable for 4.1 maybe? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10624

[Bug bootstrap/21481] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to crtstuff.c

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 13:41 --- Subject: Bug 21481 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 13:40:14 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog crtstuff.c Log message:

[Bug c/21513] New: Obsolete uninizialized Warning message

Because of my used compiler flags -Werreor it is stated as error insteed of a warning. The problem is that the compiler complains while there isn't anythin wrong at all. Worked with 3.4.3. aie_memory_heap_ptr is the variable which the compiler wrong assumes that it may not be initialized while it i

[Bug tree-optimization/21513] [4.0/4.1 Regression] __builtin_expect getting in the way of uninitialized warnings

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:06 --- Confirmed, reduced testcase: void f(void*); void *g(void); void _aie_malloc(unsigned int size) { void *aie_memory_heap_ptr; if (__builtin_expect(((size != 0) && (aie_memory_heap_ptr = g()) != 0

[Bug bootstrap/21481] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to crtstuff.c

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:07 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/21514] New: operator<< and anonymous enum

Hi, The attached code emits a mysterious error: $ g++ -c foo.cc foo.cc: In function 'int main()': foo.cc:13: error: '' is/uses anonymous type foo.cc:13: error: trying to instantiate 'template void operator<<(MyClass&, const T&)' $ The compiler apparently fails to see that the anonymous enum c

[Bug c++/21514] operator<< and anonymous enum

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:14 --- There is some discussion on the list about this. Right now there is a DR report about this and about is this really invalid code or not. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/21514] operator<< and anonymous enum

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:15 --- Suspending as there is still questions is this really invalid code or not. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/21481] [4.1 Regression] Bootstrap is broken of FreeBSD by changes to crtstuff.c

--- Additional Comments From nathan at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:19 --- not fixed properly. just patched around -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/21514] templates and anonymous enum

--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-11 14:21 --- Whether the code is valid or not, please improve the error message :-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514

[Bug c++/21514] templates and anonymous enum

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 14:25 --- I don't see any how to improve the error message really since it says what the problem is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514

[Bug c++/21514] templates and anonymous enum

--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-11 14:38 --- I think the first line could be made clearer: '' is/uses anonymous type I'm reading it again and again, and it doesn't make sense to me. Then the second line refers to an operator<< most probably defined i

[Bug tree-optimization/18472] TREE_OPERAND (t, 1) is referenced for t being GOTO_EXPR

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |kazu at cs dot umass dot edu |dot org | URL|

[Bug c++/21454] [4.0/4.1 Regression] const array doesn't live in the rodata section in C++

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/21515] New: problem with tempalte and tempalte function compilation in a namespace

Hi, I tried to compile quite simple code: a template and operator<<(ostreami&) for it (as a template function). The template is in a namespace, but operator<< I'd like to have in the 'std' namespace. Unfortunately, the compiler rejected the code, however other compilers (i.e. in other version

[Bug tree-optimization/18472] TREE_OPERAND (t, 1) is referenced for t being GOTO_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 18:27 --- Subject: Bug 18472 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-11 18:27:35 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-if-conv.c Log messag

[Bug c++/21515] problem with tempalte and tempalte function compilation in a namespace

--- Additional Comments From marciso at box43 dot pl 2005-05-11 18:28 --- Created an attachment (id=8861) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8861&action=view) *.ii g++ -save-temps problem.cc -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21515

[Bug tree-optimization/18472] TREE_OPERAND (t, 1) is referenced for t being GOTO_EXPR

--- Additional Comments From kazu at cs dot umass dot edu 2005-05-11 18:30 --- Just checked in a patch. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/21515] problem with tempalte and tempalte function compilation in a namespace

-- What|Removed |Added CC||marciso at box43 dot pl Version|3.3.4 |3.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho

[Bug target/21516] New: ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling

The original problem is described here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00477.html -- Summary: ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug target/21516] [4.1 Regression] ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 18:37 --- Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/21516] ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling

--- Additional Comments From amylaar at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 18:39 --- [I would continue to handle this in email, but sending doesn't work right now.] Aldy Hernandez wrote: > > > >The problem is that target_flags_explicit was not being set on the >options that set additiona

[Bug java/21517] New: Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

I don't have a small test case for this, but we've narrowed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151919 down to be a gcj mis-compilation. The jar that is being mis-compiled is org.eclipse.ui.workbench. The symptom is that files can't be opened in Eclipse. Removing the .jar.so mak

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-11 18:43 --- Created an attachment (id=8864) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8864&action=view) EditorActionBars bytecode (1 of 3) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517

[Bug target/21516] [4.1 Regression] ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling

-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Summary|ppc-eabisim is broken on|[4.1 Regression] ppc-eabisim |mainline

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-11 18:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8865) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8865&action=view) EditorActionBars bytecode (2 of 3) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-11 18:44 --- Created an attachment (id=8866) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8866&action=view) EditorActionBars bytecode (3 of 3) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

--- Additional Comments From overholt at redhat dot com 2005-05-11 18:45 --- I tried compiling the bytecode with Sun's javac (as opposed to ecj) and the results are the same. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517

[Bug target/21516] [4.1 Regression] ppc-eabisim is broken on mainline - problem with argument handling

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 18:46 --- There is a fixme in the .opt: ; FIXME: Need a way to specify an alias. ;mlittle ;Target Report RejectNegative Mask(LITTLE_ENDIAN) ;Produce little endian code -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

-- What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot ||org Keywords|

[Bug java/21517] Bytecode -> native code mis-compilation

-- What|Removed |Added CC||bkonrath at redhat dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21517

[Bug c/21518] New: error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'Q_REGS' with -fPIC and -O2

GCC version: gcc (GCC) 4.0.0 (4.0.0-3mdk for Mandriva Linux release 2006.0) But also tested with gcc 4.1 CVS 0508 Architecture: ix86 GCC cannot compile the following code when -O2 and -fPIC are used : static void drawPointsLines (char type, int

[Bug target/21518] error: unable to find a register to spill in class 'Q_REGS' with -fPIC and -O2

-- What|Removed |Added Component|c |target GCC target triplet||i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug

[Bug libfortran/21459] strings of different length in a single character(len=*) declaration

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 20:24 --- The problem is that all characters declared on the same line share the same gfc_charlen structure. This should be fixed during resolution, I'll have a look at this. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug target/20625] [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates "unaligned access exception"

--- Additional Comments From tsv at solvo dot ru 2005-05-11 20:39 --- (In reply to comment #22) > Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ivopts produces code that generates "unaligned access exception" > > > On May 5, 2005, at 4:03 PM, tsv at solvo dot ru wrote: > > > I am trying to find o

[Bug libfortran/21459] strings of different length in a single character(len=*) declaration

--- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 20:45 --- This patch passes the testsuite and fixes the bug, but creates a memory leak: * decl.c (add_init_expr_to_sym): Create new gfc_charlen for each item with length = (*) Index: decl.c ==

  1   2   >