[Bug tree-optimization/18048] [4.0 Regression] mgrid loop performance regression with ivopts

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 20:27 --- Subject: Bug 18048 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 20:27:21 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog fold-const.c tree-ssa-loop-

[Bug libstdc++/18185] Unhandled exceptions leak

--- Additional Comments From velco at fadata dot bg 2004-10-27 20:29 --- (In reply to comment #0) > are leaked, as the TSD destructor for __cxa_eh_globals > instance does delete them. I mean, of course, DOES NOT delete them. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18185

[Bug libfortran/18103] libgfortran system header conflict breaks bootstrap on MinGW

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-27 20:36 --- In addition to the patch in comment #1, this patch is also needed to fix this bug: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18103

[Bug libfortran/18105] Compile errors in libgfortran/io/unix.c break Windows bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-27 20:37 --- Revised patch here: . -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18105

[Bug c++/18188] New: bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in std namespace

The typedef for bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in the std namespace. -- Summary: bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in std namespace Product: gcc Version: 3.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug libfortran/18105] Compile errors in libgfortran/io/unix.c break Windows bootstrap

--- Additional Comments From aaronavay62 at aaronwl dot com 2004-10-27 21:19 --- Revised patch here: (honest). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18105

[Bug debug/17406] [4.0 regression] ICE dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr, at dwarf2out.c:1692

--- Additional Comments From dannysmith at users dot sourceforge dot net 2004-10-27 21:27 --- Patch submitted here for review: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg02425.html Danny -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17406

[Bug c++/18188] bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in std namespace

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 21:45 --- No bit_vector is not defined there at all, it the header is for backwards compatibility only and really should not be used. Use vector instead. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18188] bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in std namespace

--- Additional Comments From miles at lubin dot us 2004-10-27 22:06 --- I am trying to port an old application to gcc 3.4, and it assumes that bit_vector is in std. It's supposed to be backwords compatible, but its not, hence the bug report. -- What|Removed

[Bug c++/18188] bit_vector in backward/bvector.h should be in std namespace

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 22:10 --- But it should not be in the std namespace because the C++ standard does not define it in the std namespace. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 14248 *** -- What|Removed

[Bug libstdc++/14248] [3.4 Regression] Bit_vectors do not work (regression)

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 22:10 --- *** Bug 18188 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/13158] bad unwind info as a result of sibcall

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 22:44 --- Subject: Bug 13158 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 22:44:09 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog gcc/config/ia64: i

[Bug java/18068] With --enable-checking=rtl, libjava test "pr83 -O3 compilation from bytecode" fails

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 22:58 --- Bah, I haven't been able to repeat it for the last two updates; the test passes and no differences with/without --enable-checking=rtl. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug java/18068] With --enable-checking=rtl, libjava test "pr83 -O3 compilation from bytecode" fails

--- Additional Comments From hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 22:59 --- bah -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resol

[Bug target/18189] New: [3.3 regression] __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k

[forwarded from http://bugs.debian.org/278388] bug submitter writes: I confirm RC Bug#278135 on crest.debian.org's dchroot unstable, so I track down it with help of gotom and we suspect this is because of __fixunsdfdi in libgcc.a of gcc-3.3 (1:3.3.5-1). I confirm that gawk-3.1.4-1 (was succsessf

[Bug target/18189] [3.3 regression] __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||3.3.5 Known to work||3.2.3 3.3.4 3.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.

[Bug target/13158] bad unwind info as a result of sibcall

--- Additional Comments From wilson at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 23:16 --- Thanks for the help. I got bogged down trying to figure out how to debug gcj/libjava problems, and wasn't able to make any useful progress before getting distracted by other stuff. I've now checked the patc

[Bug target/18189] [3.3 regression] __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |3.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189

[Bug target/18189] [3.3 regression] __fixunsdfdi problem on m68k

-- What|Removed |Added CC||schwab at suse dot de http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18189

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 23:45 --- I'm not sure that subfc/subfe is going to be cheaper than a compare and a branch, even if the branch is mispredicted half the time. Do you have timing results? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 23:52 --- I should note when I was doing SPEC work, using subfc/subfe did not help SPEC at all (I tried to change the source and also rs6000.md). -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154

[Bug rtl-optimization/16088] [4.0 Regression] Generates wrong code

--- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 23:53 --- No, I don't think you can trust the values of variables in gdb when using stabs (like on Darwin) at optimisation levels higher than -O0. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16088

[Bug c++/17435] [4.0 Regression] Binding a temporary of derived type to reference of base

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |mark at codesourcery dot com |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug java/18190] New: [4.0 regression] primitive array optimization is gone

Sample source: public class t { public static final int[] x = { 5, 7, 9, 11 }; } In gcc 3.3 (and 3.4 and earlier than 3.3), this code compiled to something like: .LJv0.0: .long _Jv_intVTable .long 4 .long 5 .long 7 .long 9 .long 11 N

[Bug target/18010] bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue)

--- Additional Comments From wilson at tuliptree dot org 2004-10-28 01:16 --- Subject: Re: bad unwind info due to multiple returns (missing epilogue) On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 04:05, davidm at hpl dot hp dot com wrote: > Command: /home/davidm/src/gcc/gcc/cc1 -quiet -iprefix /home/da

[Bug java/18190] [4.0 regression] primitive array optimization is gone

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 01:39 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW E

[Bug c++/12288] unintelligible error message for constructor declaration with misspelled type

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 02:08 --- The example in comment#2 is fixed on the mainline (the q part is a different problem, I will file it soon): pr12288.cc:3: error: qT1 in class 'X' does not name a type But other than that we still have prob

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 02:52 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/17529] [4.0 Regression] ICE in get_indirect_ref_operands

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:03 --- Subject: Bug 17529 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:03:48 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog tree-cfg.c gcc/tes

[Bug middle-end/18164] [4.0 Regression] ICE on trivial invalid asm

-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |bje at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug c++/18016] Warn about member variables initialized with itself

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:35 --- > -Winit-self has nothing to do with this problem really. > in this case :a(a) is equivalent to this->a = this->a; Not really. The member-list syntax is used to *initialize* the members, not to assign a val

[Bug c++/17743] dependent expressions in attributes

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:38 --- (In reply to comment #19) > Jason, this is the bug I talked about briefly. Do you think > the Redmond offsetof work is also applicable here? Mind to share that? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c

[Bug c++/17577] [4.0 Regression] #pragma implementation no longer diagnoses use after file to which it applies

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:40 --- This is a regression, by the way. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/18186] Spelling error

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:42 --- Subject: Bug 18186 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:42:22 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog common.opt Log message:

[Bug other/18186] Spelling error

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:42 --- Fixed in 3.4.3. -- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOL

[Bug other/18186] Spelling error

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:43 --- Subject: Bug 18186 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:43:10 Modified files: gcc: Change

[Bug c++/17645] Add a warning for potentially unsafe unsigned operations

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:44 --- So, is this bug still valid, or does -ftrapv do what you want? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17645

[Bug c++/17648] [3.3/3.4 Regression] template destructor was not called for inherited classes

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:49 --- OK, reported to be actual on 3.4.2 as well, on HP-UX at least. It looks like some really weird problem, maybe latent on mainline. Can any of our testcase reduction specialist try to extract a small testcase

[Bug c++/13560] [3.3/3.4 regression] wrong file name in error message

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:49 --- Subject: Bug 13560 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:49:41 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug c++/13560] [3.3 regression] wrong file name in error message

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:50 --- Fixed also in 3.4.3, Gaby is this okay to apply to the 3.3 branch when it opens up again? -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/18163] [4.0 Regression] libffi test case ICE's on darwin

-- What|Removed |Added CC|rth at gcc dot gnu dot org | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org

[Bug middle-end/18163] [4.0 Regression] libffi test case ICE's on darwin

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:53 --- Subject: Bug 18163 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 03:53:33 Modified files: gcc: ChangeLog expr.c Log message:

[Bug c++/17648] [3.3/3.4 Regression] template destructor was not called for inherited classes

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.2 |3.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17648

[Bug middle-end/18163] [4.0 Regression] libffi test case ICE's on darwin

--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:56 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED R

[Bug c++/17166] Improve diagnostic for empty overload set listing the rejected overloads

--- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-28 03:58 --- No, this is not a substitution failure, but rather a deduction failure. We cannot deduce the enum from the function call because it is not a valid non- type template parameter. What is questionable here is

[Bug target/17956] [4.0 Regression] ICE in rs6000_emit_minmax, config/rs6000/rs6000.c:11725

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 03:59 --- Fixed, note Ada still does not build but the first issue is a known one with a patch. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug libstdc++/18185] Unhandled exceptions leak

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 04:13 --- Confirmed. Patch posted here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/16799] PowerPC - load reuse opportunity

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 04:27 --- Fixed on the mainline (note this is powerp64-darwin but should represent powerpc64-linux closely): _foo: lwz r0,0(r3) .align32 4,0x6000 L2: subf r9,r0,r3 lwz r0,0(r9)

[Bug tree-optimization/16799] PowerPC - load reuse opportunity

-- What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16799

[Bug c++/14124] enum definition with __attribute__((packed)) gives syntax errors

--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 04:42 --- Patch here: . -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/18140] [3.4/4.0 regression] C++ parser bug when using >> in templates

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:17 --- Subject: Bug 18140 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 05:17:15 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c call.c gc

[Bug c++/17435] [4.0 Regression] Binding a temporary of derived type to reference of base

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:17 --- Subject: Bug 17435 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 05:17:15 Modified files: gcc/cp : ChangeLog parser.c call.c gc

[Bug c++/17435] [4.0 Regression] Binding a temporary of derived type to reference of base

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:26 --- Fixed in GCC 4.0. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RE

[Bug c++/18140] [3.4/4.0 regression] C++ parser bug when using >> in templates

--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:28 --- Subject: Bug 18140 CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc Module name:gcc Branch: gcc-3_4-branch Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 05:28:24 Modified files: gcc/cp : Change

[Bug c++/18140] [3.4/4.0 regression] C++ parser bug when using >> in templates

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:28 --- Fixed in GCC 3.4.3. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|

[Bug c++/17056] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] ambiguous function call problem

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 05:40 --- This code is invalid; neither template is more specialized than the other. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug c++/16381] [3.3/4.0 Regression] Structure layout bug

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 06:00 --- On i686-pc-linux-gnu, with both GCC 3.4.2 and GCC 4.0, I see : __m128 size 16, align 16 Quad size 16, align 16 Base1 32 Derived1 32 Offset 20 Base2 32 Derived2 48 Offset 32 I am building a Cygwin cross

[Bug c++/18077] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] Members of anonymous namespaces get name mangled with first global variable instead of file name

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 06:04 --- Using -z muldefs is beyond the scope of the C++ standard. There is no way to win for everyone here; some people really do not want the random names because they want predictability from the compiler. --

[Bug c++/16381] [3.3/4.0 Regression] Structure layout bug

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 06:18 --- On Cygwin, I still get "24 32 24" for Base 2. The reason turns out to have nothing to do with PODs. Rather, it is due to the fact that on Cygwin, BIGGEST_FIELD_ALIGNMENT is set to 8 bytes. So, even thoug

[Bug c++/17775] [3.3/3.4/4.0 Regression] -frepo with function template in anonymous namespace fails to compile

--- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 06:24 --- There is really no easy way to fix this problem. If we were to have -frepo set the random seed to a known value, we'd then get link errors when linking multiple translation units containing anonymous names

[Bug c/17913] [4.0 Regression] ICE jumping into statement expression

--- Additional Comments From loki at inf dot u-szeged dot hu 2004-10-28 06:42 --- (In reply to comment #7) > > Surely this is not valid? > > The validity is the subject of bug 772 and the long thread linked from > there. This bug is for a particular ICE which is a regression; whether

<    1   2