https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #13 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
> > *** Bug 69420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>
> Yes, but what about pr69419?
What about it? It is unrelated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 25 17:32:36 2018
New Revision: 257974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/83633
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> *** Bug 69420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Yes, but what about pr69419?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 25 17:08:51 2018
New Revision: 257972
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257972&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/83633
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sun Feb 25 16:50:50 2018
New Revision: 257971
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257971&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-02-25 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/83633
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 12:13:09AM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> > Patched to mailing list.
>
> Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-01/msg00192.html which seems to
> have never been applie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Patched to mailing list.
Patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2018-01/msg00192.html which seems to
have never been applied. What is the problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #4 from Nathan T. Weeks ---
Fortran 2008 appears to have tightened restrictions on explicit-shape arrays in
the main program and made this particular case illegal (per section 5.3.8.2
"Explicit-shape array"):
C531 (R516) An explicit-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also, this does not ICE:
integer :: A(command_argument_count())
a = 1
write (*,*) A
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83633
Bug ID: 83633
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error for explicit-shape
array with non-constant bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 7.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am getting wfdb and will attemt to confirm this bug on non-cygwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #6 from Isabelle ---
I searched for a second cugwin1.dll. I found an old (2004) one however it was
not in the path. I deleted it, rebooted, now there is only one. The same error
persists.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Isabelle from comment #3)
> All of this was working before I upgraded Cygwin, and tried to compile again
> ecgpuwave.
Did you read the initial error message and follow
the direction?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #3 from Isabelle ---
All of this was working before I upgraded Cygwin, and tried to compile again
ecgpuwave.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #2 from Isabelle ---
It is installed with wfdb package from Physionet:
https://www.physionet.org/physiotools/wfdb-windows-quick-start.shtml#c32s
The whole package can hte downloaded from:
http://physionet.org/physiotools/wfdb.tar.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Bug ID: 71770
Summary: gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
(program f951)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71032
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71032
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71032
Bug ID: 71032
Summary: explicit interface and must not have attributes
generates gfortran: internal compiler error: Abort
trap: 6 (program f951)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Oct 2 20:19:32 2015
New Revision: 228423
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228423&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66979
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Oct 2 00:49:28 2015
New Revision: 228364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228364&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-01 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66979
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
Bug ID: 66979
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error with malformed FLUSH
statement
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus 2013-02-18
20:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
...
> function int_fvec2vec (f_vec, n) result (c_vec)
> integer f_vec(:)
...
> subroutine lat_to_c (Fp, C) bind(c)
...
> call lat_to_c2 (c_loc(fvec2vec(ic
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|gfortran internal compiler |[4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression]
|error |gfortran internal compiler
||error
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #5 from Joost VandeVondele
2013-02-18 18:48:28 UTC ---
simplified testcase:
module t
use, intrinsic :: iso_c_binding
interface fvec2vec
module procedure int_fvec2vec
end interface
contains
function int_fvec2vec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2013-02-18
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #3 from David Sagan 2013-02-18
16:36:14 UTC ---
Somehow the attachment did not get sent with the initial writeup Now it is
downloaded.
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > 1) Unpack and cd to the attached
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
--- Comment #2 from David Sagan 2013-02-18
16:34:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 29483
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29483
3 *.f90 files and script to run them
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56378
Bug #: 56378
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
--- Comment #5 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 19:49 ---
FIXED on the trunk (4.6) and on the 4.5 branch.
Thanks for the bug report!
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #4 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 19:37 ---
Subject: Bug 45530
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Sep 4 19:36:47 2010
New Revision: 163866
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163866
Log:
2010-09-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/45530
*
--- Comment #3 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 17:47 ---
Subject: Bug 45530
Author: burnus
Date: Sat Sep 4 17:47:02 2010
New Revision: 163862
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163862
Log:
2010-09-04 Tobias Burnus
PR fortran/45530
*
--- Comment #2 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 16:43 ---
The endless loop happens in derived_inaccessible - seemingly called by
resolve_fl_namelist (all resolve.c); that check happens before the
pointer-components check.
Moving the PRIVATE/accessible check _after_ the poin
--- Comment #1 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 08:14 ---
CONFIRM.
NAG prints:
Error: nm2.f90, line 22: Namelist-group-object CURVE has a POINTER component
--
burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
melist
-- David
PS: I am working on linux:
lnx4103:~/bmad/bmad_dist/test> uname -a
Linux lnx4103.lns.cornell.edu 2.6.18-194.11.1.el5 #1 SMP Tue Aug 10 16:39:28
EDT 2010 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error
Product: gcc
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 04:48 ---
Test case committed after verifying that it passes.
Closing.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Comment #6 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-19 04:47 ---
Subject: Bug 32635
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jul 19 04:47:29 2007
New Revision: 126742
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126742
Log:
2007-07-19 Thomas Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tr
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-18 17:00 ---
I'll commit the test case so there's no regression.
Assigning to myself so I don't forget it.
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-18 15:43 ---
This might have gotten fixed by the patch which fixed PR 32705.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32635
--- Comment #3 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-07-18 15:39 ---
Well, it seems to have been fixed or gone back into hiding -
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran -c -O2 aled7.F
[dranta:~/tests/gfortran-D] dir% gfortran --v
Using built-in specs.
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin8.10.0
Conf
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-17 21:58 ---
Works for me with gcc version 4.3.0 20070715 on i686-pc-linux-gnu.
Could this be target specific?
--
tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--- Comment #1 from dir at lanl dot gov 2007-07-10 17:23 ---
Also fails on suse linux and intel macintosh.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32635
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
|
ary: gfortran - internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dir at lanl
Hopefully this is everything you need: output from the gfortran
command, the source file, and the .mod and .s files that were
generated. GFORTRAN was installed from binary using fink a day or so
ago. Since this was my first use of fink, I'm not sure why it got the
experimental version.
$ unam
--- Comment #2 from tobias dot burnus at physik dot fu-berlin dot de
2006-08-22 21:08 ---
Using gfortran 4.1.2 20060705 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)
and GNU Fortran 95 (GCC) 4.2.0 20060822 (experimental)
it compiles and gives the output (from the program):
det for matrices bigger than 4x
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-08-22 20:53 ---
Upgrade your compiler to at least 4.1.1, and try again.
Also, you need an explicit interface for the
recursive function in your main program
interface
recursive real function det(a) result(res)
real, dimensio
t (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU Fortran comes with NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law.
You may redistribute copies of GNU Fortran
under the terms of the GNU General Public License.
For more information about these matters, see the file named COPYING
--
Summary:
--- Comment #4 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-01 06:53 ---
This is actually a dup of bug 24266.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 24266 ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.1.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25584
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-12-28 00:00 ---
This is not a dup of bug 25041.
This has been fixed since at least 4.1.0 20051112.
So closing as fixed.
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
tmp/ccK0rRq0.f:0: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
Might be a duplicate of 25041
--
Summary: gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation
--- Comment #3 from haymaker at mail dot utexas dot edu 2005-11-26 06:03
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> How are you building this? If I fix and run the make_rk script
> for all possibilities, I get a 16000+ line program.
>
I built it with the "r1" option ($make_rk r1) for 1D array de
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 02:49 ---
Reduce test case.
module z
type b
character(len=80) :: r(10)
end type b
contains
subroutine a(c)
type(b), intent(inout), target :: c
write (c%r,"(a)") "death"
end subroutine a
e
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-11-26 00:11 ---
How are you building this? If I fix and run the make_rk script
for all possibilities, I get a 16000+ line program.
--
kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
mentioned in bug #22160 just fine.
--
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
when compiling 'rksuite_90'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component
--- Comment #8 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-03 19:43 ---
*** Bug 24179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-12
15:21 ---
Fixed at least on the mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-11
22:01 ---
Aren't these fixed? Trying to compile these testcases with an up-to-date
compiler, I don't get ICEs...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20971
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-11
12:47 ---
*** Bug 23323 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-23
12:48 ---
This is a dup of bug 15966. Thanks for your report.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15966 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
ate.
See http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
Have reported bug to Redhat as well.
--
Summary: gfortran internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
11:16 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
10:01 ---
Subject: Bug 20954
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Branch: gcc-4_0-branch
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 10:00:57
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : Change
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
09:54 ---
Subject: Bug 20954
CVSROOT:/cvs/gcc
Module name:gcc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-05-18 09:54:21
Modified files:
gcc/testsuite : ChangeLog
gcc/fortran: C
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06
13:52 ---
*** Bug 21415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From dir at lanl dot gov 2005-04-15 15:12 ---
This error is killing "-fdefault-integer-8" - I hit it in almost every program I
try to compile. Here is another example -
[dranta:~/tests] dir% gfortran -fdefault-integer-8 -c d8test3.f
d8test3.f: In function 'MAIN__'
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13
10:03 ---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
E
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-13
10:03 ---
*** Bug 20986 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20971
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12 16:09
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> program main
> character*6 hed
> character*6 final
> data final /'stop' /
> if (hed(1).eq.final) stop
if(hed(1:1).eq.final) stop
> stop
op
stop
end
--
Summary: gfortran - internal compiler error on bad program -
fdefault-integer-8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
As
--- Additional Comments From dir at lanl dot gov 2005-04-12 13:57 ---
Subject: Re: gfortran - internal compiler error with
-fdefault-real-8
Macintosh 10.3.8
> --- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12
> 00:04 ---
> (In reply to c
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12 00:15
---
>
> powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
>
Must be target specific
troutmask:kargl[204] cat ki.f
subroutine prncp3
common /concrt/ sigma(6)
equivalence (sigma(1),p1)
sigma(1)=sin(phi + 2.*pi/3
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12
00:11 ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Dale, what OS are you using? The above compiles
> fine on amd64-*-freebsd.
powerpc-apple-darwin7.8.0
Also make sure that you are using -fdefault-real-8, I could confirm it on
--- Additional Comments From kargl at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-12 00:04
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> subroutine prncp3
> common /concrt/ sigma(6)
> equivalence (sigma(1),p1)
> sigma(1)=sin(phi + 2.*pi/3.d0)
> return
> end
Dale, what OS are you us
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
21:01 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 20120 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary: gfortran - internal compiler error with -fdefault-real-8
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: di
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-11
20:14 ---
Confirmed, I might have a fix soon.
--
What|Removed |Added
CC|
fn='output'
lrecl=4048
open (2,file=nfn,access='direct',form='unformatted'
1,recl=lrecl,status='unknown')
stop
end
--
Summary: gfortran - internal compiler error with -fdefault-
integer-8
On Oct 20, 2004, at 9:21 AM, Gordon Sande wrote:
Reporting the bug requires setting up my 1,070,045th user account
somewhere
so I will use the email version as the gccbug script exists somewhere
else.
Mac Os X 10.3.5
Dual 1.8 G5 Mac standard configuration, i.e middle model before first
speed bu
Reporting the bug requires setting up my 1,070,045th user account
somewhere
so I will use the email version as the gccbug script exists somewhere
else.
Mac Os X 10.3.5
Dual 1.8 G5 Mac standard configuration, i.e middle model before first
speed bump
"sudo fink install gfortran" used to insta
95 matches
Mail list logo
