--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
13:14 ---
fmovdne %fcc1, %f50, %f8
Yep this is still a dup of bug 15247.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15247 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aaron_williams at net dot com 2005-08-04
06:25 ---
Subject: Re: gcc optimization error for sparc with xine/ffmpeg,
bad assembly generated
Hmmm, I though I had binutils 2.16.1, but it's actually 2.15... that
might be the problem. Trying to upgra
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
06:18 ---
The test.s file assembles fine on my machine with GNU as 2.16. Could you
compile the test.i file with -v and post the command line passed to the
assembler?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
--- Additional Comments From aaronw at attbi dot com 2005-08-04 05:28
---
Interesting... it assembles with binutils as 2.12.1... could this be another
binutils bug?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23222
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
05:01 ---
Please attach the generated assembly file.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCO
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
04:27 ---
Lets reopen it then.
Could you attach the .s file?
And the preprocessed source, the .i file.
Both can be got by adding -save-temps to the gcc invocation.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-04
01:36 ---
This is a gas bug.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15247 ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15247 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From aaronw at net dot com 2005-08-04 01:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=9425)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9425&action=view)
Test case that creates the problem
gcc -O3 -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc -fno-inline-functions -c
test.c -o
unc1_name[i]; i++){
if(strmatch(next, p->func1_name[i])){
return p->func1[i](p->opaque, d);
}
}
for(i=0; p->func2_name && p->func2_name[i]; i++){
if(strmatch(next, p->func2_name[i])){
I'd submit this through bugzilla but it looks like it's hosed right
now...
When attempting to compile Xine for Solaris I got the following error:
gcc -O3 -mcpu=ultrasparc -mtune=ultrasparc -fno-inline-functions -c
test.c -o test.o
/var/tmp//cco3qSnO.s: Assembler messages:
/var/tmp//cco3qSnO.s:
11 matches
Mail list logo
