stephane duverger wrote:
Father was removed because of "goto __end", simply because gcc thought
that this code part will never be reached. But process is cloned() and
it should have taken into account the "jnz father"
Gcc does not look at the contents of an asm, so it does not know that
there
Hello,
I think there is a little problem under gcc ! It seems that gcc thinks
that a code block will never be reach and so do not generate its code,
but it's wrong :
-- test.c START --
void foo_printf(char *str)
{
}
int foo()
{
//assembly for sys_clone()
asm volatile (
"xor %ebx,
