https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
--- Comment #9 from Hale Wang ---
Hi Tim,
Your testcase is caused by the combine. It's not the same with Siarhei's test
case. So I think we should divide your test case to another bug.
And my patch is only used to fix the bug with your test cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
--- Comment #8 from Hale Wang ---
I have submitted a patch to community for further discussion. Refer to:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02238.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Hale Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hale.Wang at arm dot com
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
--- Comment #6 from Tim Pambor ---
Created attachment 33309
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33309&action=edit
"-da" rtl files for testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Tim Pambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33307|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
--- Comment #4 from Tim Pambor ---
Created attachment 33307
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33307&action=edit
testcase for gcc 4.9.1
I think this bug is still present in gcc 4.9.1 and 4.8.4.
I could reproduce the problem wi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ra, wrong-code
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Siarhei Siamashka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22144|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
--- Comment #1 from Siarhei Siamashka
2010-10-25 10:37:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 22144
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22144
proposed testcase for x86_64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Summary: Local variables in specified registers don't work
correctly with inline asm operands
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
Hello,
Following code (written just for fun) leads to:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
main () at main-general.cpp:95
95 printf("%d\n", x_reg);
BTW, there is warning when using ecx, eax, edx.
should there be any warning for esp?
GCC 4.4
X86
Compile flags: -g3
13 matches
Mail list logo