On 30 Oct 2007 00:14:21 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #17 from rask at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-30 00:14 ---
> Created an attachment (id=14438)
> --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14438&action=view)
> patch v3, varargs
On 28 Oct 2007 11:14:37 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How many times do I have to say this is bad for most RISC targets (hosts)?
Really if the type being is used is wrong, they should be changed
rather than changing to use var-args.
-- Pinski
On 27 Oct 2007 23:16:57 -, rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please give this patch a try. I need it to build GCC with OpenWatcom, which
> wants parameters on the stack by default.
I think this makes some worse code in some cases. Var-args is very
bad for code generatio
