Nick Clifton writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
>> + /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
>> + if (size == 0)
>> +size = 1;
>
> That fixes it! Thanks.
>
> Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
> test case as a separate email to gcc-patches ?
It
Nick Clifton writes:
>> + /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
>> + if (size == 0)
>> +size = 1;
>
> That fixes it!
Great! Thanks for confirming.
> Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
> test case as a separate email to gcc-patches
Hi Richard,
+ /* Even zero-sized arguments occupy one byte. */
+ if (size == 0)
+ size = 1;
That fixes it! Thanks.
Will you apply this patch yourself, or should I submit the patch and the
test case as a separate email to gcc-patches ?
Cheers
Nick
Nick Clifton writes:
> Hi Eric, Hi Richard,
>
> A customer has reported the following bug with the MIPS target. Since
> it is for a GNU extension to the C language (zero-length arrays) that
> is being used in a non-intended fashion (the zero-length array is in a
> structure with no other
Hi Eric, Hi Richard,
A customer has reported the following bug with the MIPS target. Since
it is for a GNU extension to the C language (zero-length arrays) that
is being used in a non-intended fashion (the zero-length array is in a
structure with no other fields) I doubt if you will want
