Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
There's also a 3.4/4.0 failure listed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00034.html
Any thoughts on {char,wchar_t}/13189.cc ?
Yes, I'm working on it: something is messed up wrt the includes
necessary when _GLIBCXX_USE___ENC_TRAITS: in normal
builds you don't notice
> I'm trying to help for the libstdc++-v3 failure:
Great, thanks!
>
> can you confirm that, in order to reproduce, I should just add
> -fpic/-fPIC to the CXXFLAGS?
Yup.
There's also a 3.4/4.0 failure listed here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-01/msg00034.html
Any thoughts on {char,wchar_
Hi Kaveh,
Finally, here are the excess -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures from
mainline on i686-pc-linux-gnu as noted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00027.html
I'd like some assistance categorizing them please.
I'm trying to help for the libstdc++-v3 failure: can you confirm
On Jan 1, 2005, at 2:54 PM, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dce-2.c scan-tree-dump-times if 0
(New testcase.)
This is expected as the function might be overridden in a different
TU (yes this is a weird case but it can happen).
Thanks,
Andrew Pinski
Finally, here are the excess -fpic/-fPIC testsuite failures from
mainline on i686-pc-linux-gnu as noted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00027.html
I'd like some assistance categorizing them please.
A. Fixable in the testcase.
B. Expected failures, use dg-skip-if or equiv.
C
