https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120856
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120856
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13390e1b65f499ba33b7b5ff76bd9936e81b74e4
commit r16-1758-g13390e1b65f499ba33b7b5ff76bd9936e81b74e4
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120856
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #0)
> R22:DI.
Should read R24:DI.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120856
Bug ID: 120856
Summary: [avr] during RTL pass: split2: internal compiler
error: Segmentation fault with -mno-lra
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[12/13/14/15/16 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120852
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95145
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bic60176 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120369
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bic60176 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120852
Bug ID: 120852
Summary: internal compiler error: in analyze_functions, at
cgraphunit.cc:1418
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120851
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120851
Bug ID: 120851
Summary: internal compiler error: in expand_call, at
calls.cc:3729
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
: Wed Jun 25 10:29:49 2025 -0400
c++: fix ICE with [[deprecated]] [PR120756]
Here we end up with "error reporting routines re-entered" because
resolve_nondeduced_context isn't passing complain to mark_used.
PR c++/120756
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 61735
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61735&action=edit
gcc16-pr120608.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Why are you using the attribute at -O0?
In any case, this boils down to roughly -O0 -fsanitize=address
[[gnu::noipa]] int
foo (int x)
{
return x;
}
[[gnu::noipa]] void
bar (int *x, int *y, int *z)
{
(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120816
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
plicate:V2DI (reg:DI 111 [ _46 ]))) "tcpsock_test.go":691:12
discrim 1 -1
(nil))
and caused:
tcpsock_test.go: In function 'net.TestTCPBig..func2':
tcpsock_test.go:684:28: error: in basic block 21:
684 | go func() {
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120794
James K. Lowden changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-06-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||addmlbx at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16
: Tue Jun 24 09:17:12 2025 +0200
libstdc++: Report compilation error on formatting "%d" from month_last
[PR120650]
For month_day we incorrectly reported day information to be available,
which lead
to format_error being thrown from the call to formatter::format at runtim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120650
--- Comment #4 from Tomasz Kamiński ---
The chrono_io.h change will be backported to v15.
/google/protobuf/generated_message_tctable_lite.cc:1065:57: error: cannot
tail-call: other reasons
This is on GCC 5bc92717b804483a17dd5095f8b6d4fd75a472b1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120816
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_quarantine.h: In
function 'void __sanitizer::Quarantine::DoRecycle(Cache*,
Callback) [with Callback = __asan::QuarantineCallback; Node =
__asan::AsanChunk]':
../../../../../gcc/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_quarantine.h:192:3:
error: unable to generate r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120816
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 61709
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61709&action=edit
A patch
I am testing this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120816
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120816
Bug ID: 120816
Summary: [16 Regression] tcpsock_test.go:684:28: error: flow
control insn inside a basic block
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120756
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
||4.9.0, 4.9.4
Summary|internal compiler error:|[12/13/14/15/16 Regression]
|error reporting routines|internal compiler error:
|re-entered with |error reporting routines
|[[deprecated
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120800
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|internal compiler error |[14/15/16 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113207
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113207
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07490d983161912fa314607c5a5beb9c49cc4a3f
commit r12-11223-g07490d983161912fa314607c5a5beb9c49cc4a3f
Author: Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120800
Bug ID: 120800
Summary: internal compiler error when using partially
initialized class with private constructor and friend
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf7162b321128ba93521a824e5a7a00d1cc3d1f8
commit r16-1639-gbf7162b321128ba93521a824e5a7a00d1cc3d1f8
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Mon Jun 23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120754
--- Comment #2 from Alfred Agrell ---
Per the linked Clang bug, this isn't ice-on-invalid - it's ice-on-valid (though
implausible, of course). And if the variable is named, it's a rejects-valid.
https://eel.is/c++draft/except#handle-2
> A hand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120794
Bug ID: 120794
Summary: extra separator periods lead to syntax error
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fa2e03effa5251a6f7c8b79a8e3be81c90fb5e4f
commit r15-9855-gfa2e03effa5251a6f7c8b79a8e3be81c90fb5e4f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e5cf6027581770e97790f6495a56515ea4d0f7c2
commit r15-9854-ge5cf6027581770e97790f6495a56515ea4d0f7c2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
, try to
find a work-around for them, etc., but not actually report them so they can be
fixed (either no interest in doing so and/or no time, and it often does take a
time-consuming effort to properly report them, including creating a minimally
reproducible example which I personally always try to do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:35a26f2ec55d20d524464c33b68b23328a7f6bbe
commit r16-1626-g35a26f2ec55d20d524464c33b68b23328a7f6bbe
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120608
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9523a935aaa28ffae9118e199a2f43a8a98e27e
commit r16-1625-gb9523a935aaa28ffae9118e199a2f43a8a98e27e
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676
--- Comment #4 from Nathaniel Shead ---
(In reply to Larry Smith from comment #3)
> Thanks for the feedback. Will take a look into the "Textual merging of
> reachable GM entities" issue you mentioned. The
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676
--- Comment #3 from Larry Smith ---
Thanks for the feedback. Will take a look into the "Textual merging of
reachable GM entities" issue you mentioned. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114990 bug you referred to however
(that I po
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676
--- Comment #2 from Nathaniel Shead ---
Ah, I see you actually already reported almost exactly this in PR114990 :) The
message is still "hopefully will be fixed for the next major release" but I
personally have very limited time for OSS things,
ented—textually redefining an entity that has been defined in an imported
header-unit. A redefinition error is emitted.
---
In this example, the issue is that the 'import CompilerVersions' at the top of
'FunctionTraits.h' declares (hidden) names from e.g. , that are
then re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119830
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119830
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:07c02ff39e121a496c46d3a997a25e2f46ce227e
commit r16-1614-g07c02ff39e121a496c46d3a997a25e2f46ce227e
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120735
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
]
|print error about catching |Segfault when trying to
|function type |print error about catching
||function type
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120756
Bug ID: 120756
Summary: internal compiler error: error reporting routines
re-entered with [[deprecated]]
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
: Sun Jun 22 04:13:26 2025 +0100
[PR modula2/120731] error in Strings.Pos causing sigsegv
This patch corrects the m2log library procedure function
Strings.Pos which incorrectly sliced the wrong component
of the source string. The incorrect slice could cause
a sigsegv if negative
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117877
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 61679
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61679&action=edit
Proposed patch for Strings.Pos
Here is a proposed patch (currently being bootstrap tested).
An internal Slice i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120735
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120754
Bug ID: 120754
Summary: Segfault when trying to print error about catching
function type
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107341
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109461
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:49199bb29628365fc6c60bd185808a1bad65086d
commit r16-1601-g49199bb29628365fc6c60bd185808a1bad65086d
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Sat Jun 21
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I think the way to go for the data prefetching issue is:
1. Define a proper predicate for valid prefetch operands.
a. REG
b. REG+D where D is a simm12 with D & 0xf == 0
c. Immediate wehre immed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120735
Bug ID: 120735
Summary: -Warray-bounds error via std::vector::data after
unsigned int overflow potential
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118241
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Ah nuts! My mistake, I conflated this issue which is "prefetch" with the other
issue in the "prefetchi" space. "prefetchi" is broken and likely requires a
deeper fix than what we need here.
I don't see a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
Bug ID: 120731
Summary: Possible error in Strings.Pos causing sigsegv
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120731
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120667
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #6 from Marc Adams ---
Another case is 8861 divided by 1:
#include
#include
int main() {
fesetround( FE_UPWARD );
_Decimal128 x1 = 8861, x2 = 1 ;
printf(" x1/x2 %f \n", (double)( x1
t;
> with
>
> gcc (GCC) 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental)
>
> Unrelated / configuration error on my part?
You can avoid the printf-decimal issue on ubuntu by converting to double:
#include
#include
int main() {
fesetround( FE_UPWARD );
_Decimal128 x1 = 9825
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
If using Ubuntu, please be aware of the issue mentioned in PR120609.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hm, strange.. I get
x1/x2 %DDf
This is with
GNU C Library (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.39-0ubuntu8.4) stable release version 2.39.
with
gcc (GCC) 16.0.0 20250530 (experimental)
Unrelated / configuration error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120703
Bug ID: 120703
Summary: GCC internal compiler error in verify_cgraph_node:
"Alias and target's section differs" when processing
function alias with dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
--- Comment #1 from Marc Adams ---
I tested my larger program on a wide range of input values and it only failed
when it converted integer value '9825' to Decimal128 then divide by '1'. A
work-around could be to convert int to double then
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120695
Bug ID: 120695
Summary: internal compiler error: in import_export_decl, at
cp/decl2.cc:3569
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ewlu at rivosinc dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120691
Bug ID: 120691
Summary: _Decimal128 arithmetic error under FE_UPWARD
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
]
|auto(t) Warning Instead of |GCC Crashes After C++23
|Graceful Error |auto(t) Warning Instead of
||Graceful Error
Priority|P3 |P2
Last reconfirmed
ld be much better than
missing the FD altogether and error.
[but I can cope with that for testing gcobol when falling back to code that's
no on production]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120685
Bug ID: 120685
Summary: GCC Crashes After C++23 auto(t) Warning Instead of
Graceful Error
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus "error: destroying|[15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120684
Bug ID: 120684
Summary: bogus "error: destroying ‘’ outside its
lifetime" with constexpr dtor object inside
range-based for
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120676
Bug ID: 120676
Summary: Internal compiler error: in push_namespace (in modules
app)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
||ice-on-valid-code
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=118928
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[12/13/14 Regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120674
Bug ID: 120674
Summary: [riscv][dwarf] internal compiler error: in
int_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.cc:14520
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120667
Bug ID: 120667
Summary: internal compiler error: in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.cc:7908
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
|groktypename at |groktypename at
|gcc/c/c-decl.cc:5442 with |gcc/c/c-decl.cc:5442 with
|_Generic after an error |_Generic after an error
|since |since
|r15-1190
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118024
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117825
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116636
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116614
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102674
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119327
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12f167fb3291d10128b5c3605aa94e2eae7fa269
commit r12-11183-g12f167fb3291d10128b5c3605aa94e2eae7fa269
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116636
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7234fc38e934f8a1c6415ac49e4f690efc3feac3
commit r12-11190-g7234fc38e934f8a1c6415ac49e4f690efc3feac3
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116606
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb4249345c1241c494f7d0b6b0f6a670e4a0b4e0
commit r12-11189-geb4249345c1241c494f7d0b6b0f6a670e4a0b4e0
Author: Marek Polacek
1 - 100 of 26223 matches
Mail list logo