http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-04-15 09:26:08 UTC
---
Author: ro
Date: Fri Apr 15 09:26:05 2011
New Revision: 172477
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=172477
Log:
PR libobjc/32037
* Makefile.in (OBJC_GCFLAGS): M
--- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-03 20:46 ---
Actually since libobjc_gc does not exist for the NeXT runtime I am just
changing Makefile.in for the libobjc_gc target not to include the suffix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32037
--- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-03 20:40 ---
I have a fix, it is just a matter of moving stuff around in configure.ac and
adding the correct suffix for "libobjc_gc".
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
r.o Object.o objects.o
Protocol.o sarray.o selector.o sendmsg.o thr.o thr-objc.o exception.o
ranlib -c .libs/libobjc-gnu.a
creating libobjc-gnu.la
(cd .libs && rm -f libobjc-gnu.la && ln -s ../libobjc-gnu.la libobjc-gnu.la)
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `libobjc_gc.la', nee
So, I've been trying to build gcc with --enable-objc-gc. At first I
thought the failure to build was simply due to random bitrot;
searching the list archives doesn't show anybody using this in quite
some time. But I finally realized that the build process is looking
for libobjc_gc.la but it's b
