https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
--- Comment #8 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6)
> > Hi Richi,
> >
> > This change seems to have caused a few of our vectorization benchmarks to
> > slow down in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6)
> Hi Richi,
>
> This change seems to have caused a few of our vectorization benchmarks to
> slow down including x264 which slowed down about 7%.
>
> I can see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168
commit r11-3095-g47ddf4c7b1d4471cb9534f27844ab5e4279c2168
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Turns out gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/x86_64/costmodel-pr69297.c can be massaged to
such case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc do
