https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
--- Comment #3 from Jed Brown ---
> why not use gsym[Q*2*j+i] instead of g[j][0] and similarly gsym[Q*2-j*Q+i]
> instead of g[j][1]?
The pattern here is that gsym is packed storage of a symmetric 2x2 matrix,
while g unpacks it so that inner loo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91732
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, openmp
