--- Comment #20 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-22 15:09
---
OK, here is the status regarding the trunk (4.4) and the test cases
posted here:
1. The test case in the bug description now works in the sense that
funk is inlined even when not performing early inlining becau
--- Comment #19 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 17:51
---
As of revision 138092 we are handling this much better.
The example in bug description gets inlined at -O2 even with
-fno-early-inlining.
The example in comment #10 does not work as expected yet. The new
edg
--- Comment #18 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-04-01 14:50
---
I'm now working on a proper fix.
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-28 10:13
---
Note this is only fixed because we run inlining "twice". It isn't fixed
properly in that the new inlining opportunity should be exposed during the
first inlining pass.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
--- Comment #16 from rusty at rustcorp dot com dot au 2008-03-28 02:38
---
OK, this is fixed in gcc 4.3 (woot!), but the unused "funk" is still omitted.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35728
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Comment #15 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-07-13 15:46
---
*** Bug 32751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--- Comment #14 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-07-24 19:41
---
*** Bug 28470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9079
--- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23
15:17 ---
Again this is different than PR 3713. (steven is closing bugs which are not
really fixed or dups right
now).
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23
15:14 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 3713 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From sxanth at ceid dot upatras dot gr 2004-12-13
22:25 ---
This is present in 3.4 too
static inline int foo ()
{
return 100;
}
typedef int (*fptr)();
static const fptr a [] = { foo };
static inline int call
11 matches
Mail list logo
