https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
--- Comment #28 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #27)
> Yes, I agree with Jeff.
> This looks like a similar issue as PR109071.
the patch that improve the diagnostic for PR109071 could also improve this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Known to fail|9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.2 |---
--- Comment #24 from Eric Gallager
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |9.2
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|[9 Regression] Mi
