https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu May 10 07:38:24 2018
New Revision: 260107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/85699
* gcc.dg/nextafter-1.c (NO_LONG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
--- Comment #4 from Andrey Guskov ---
Jakub, here is the requested output:
bug at 136 aa == -3.36210314311209350626267781732175260e-4932L / 4.0L +
3.64519953188247460252840593361941982e-4951L
bug at 145 aa == -3.362103143112093506262677817321752
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 44097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44097&action=edit
gcc9-pr85699.patch
Untested workaround (if we want to workaround libc bugs in the testsuite).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If you are using glibc < 2.24, then maybe this is:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20205
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |9.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85699
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8 regression] |[9 regression]
|gcc.dg
