https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #7)
> If you're looking at this, could you also look at Fortran's way
> of handling things, for example the test cases
That was my intention to make sure fortran testc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
If you're looking at this, could you also look at Fortran's way
of handling things, for example the test cases
subroutine foo(a)
implicit none
real, dimension(:,:), contiguous, intent(out) :: a
a = a +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc-patches/AANLkTikW8W=rjonaqigggtjkb-_2sp5zaztjcamzj...@mail.gmail.com/T/#m358ef4c2bef77b1942d29d0a5787591e754ec5bc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> > We once had a very aggressive pass to do this as part of graphite
> > transforms,
> > it's on the GCC 4.7 branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> We once had a very aggressive pass to do this as part of graphite transforms,
> it's on the GCC 4.7 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=blob;f=gcc/grap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We once had a very aggressive pass to do this as part of graphite transforms,
it's on the GCC 4.7 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82450
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U