[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2017-01-09 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-05 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #9 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > Yes this looks like a different issue. I've filed PR77479, then. Is it safe to close PR72866 now?

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-04 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #7) > I have another snippet that works w/ 7.0.0-alpha20160731 snapshot, but still > takes indefinite time to compile even by 7.0.0-alpha20160904, i.e. after the > fix

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-04 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #7 from Arseny Solokha --- I have another snippet that works w/ 7.0.0-alpha20160731 snapshot, but still takes indefinite time to compile even by 7.0.0-alpha20160904, i.e. after the fix. Should I file another PR for it? void vr (int o

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-09-01 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Sep 1 11:46:57 2016 New Revision: 239931 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239931&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-08-30 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

2016-08-30 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[7 Regression] Compile time |Compile time hog w/ -O3