https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Jan 20 08:01:27 2017
New Revision: 244683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-01-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71264
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #23 from Rainer Orth ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #22)
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
> >
> > --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
>
> --- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
> > It is supposed to be vectorized on t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #21 from Eric Botcazou ---
> It is supposed to be vectorized on targets w/o V4QImode support.
> Not sure if the list of targets that FAIL the testcase would be smaller
> if I change the scan to an explicit list of targets (x86)?
Not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
>
> Eric Botcazou changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
