https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70479
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70479
--- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> You mean we fail to handle ternary associative tree codes in GIMPLE reassoc?
> Yes, that's true. It's not going to be easy to retro-fit there
> implementation-w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70479
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
You mean we fail to handle ternary associative tree codes in GIMPLE reassoc?
Yes, that's true. It's not going to be easy to retro-fit there
implementation-wise. With rebalancing you mean handling reassoc-w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70479
--- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin ---
(In reply to Kirill Yukhin from comment #0)
> Compile:
> GCC: g++ -march=haswell -Ofast -flto -fopenmp-simd -fpermissive m.cpp -o
> m.gcc
> ICC: icpc -O3 -ipo -fpermissive -xAVX2 -qopenmp m.cpp -o m.icc
C
