https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pinskia at gcc do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
>
> --- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
--- Comment #6 from Yuri Gribov ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #5)
> On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote:
>
> > This should probly go to reassoc? Or better keep it in folder?
>
> As loads are involved it doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Fri, 9 Jun 2017, tetra2005 at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
>
> Yuri Gribov changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
Yuri Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|r
