https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Xavier Roche changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.1.0, 6.2.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Bug 67283 depends on bug 67390, which changed state.
Bug 67390 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr64312.C -O1 (test
for excess errors)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67390
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #13 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Fri Sep 18 10:55:11 2015
New Revision: 227901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
completely_scalarize arrays as well as records.
gcc/:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #12 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Fri Aug 28 15:04:17 2015
New Revision: 227303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Revert: completely_scalarize arrays as well as records
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #11 from Xavier Roche ---
PS: Shall I create a twin ticket for the structure case ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #10 from Xavier Roche ---
The "Second test case" attached should produce exactly the same bytes
(byte-to-byte) for the two demo_1 and demo_2 functions. And this would not rely
on stack size that might change.
With GCC 4.4.7:
demo_2(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #9 from Xavier Roche ---
Created attachment 36260
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36260&action=edit
Second test case (might be useful for unit testing)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #7 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alalaw01
Date: Thu Aug 27 15:40:10 2015
New Revision: 227265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227265&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
completely_scalarize arrays as well as records
gcc/:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #6 from Xavier Roche ---
> the problem is that the structure contains an array an total scalarization is
> not implemented for them
I confirm that without any array the inlining is fine.
Side note: the same problem appears with an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
>
> so no total scalarization for foo? Maybe SRA is confused by the CLOBBER?
I think clobbers are fine, the problem is that the structure contains
an array an t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67283
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
14 matches
Mail list logo
